Advanced FreeS/WAN configuration
Keywords: Linux, IPsec, VPN, security, FreeSWAN, configuration

# Other configuration possibilities

This document describes various options for FreeS/WAN configuration which are less used or more complex (often both) than the standard cases described in our config and quickstart documents.

## Some rules of thumb about configuration

### Tunnels are cheap

Nearly all of the overhead in IPsec processing is in the encryption and authentication of packets. Our performance document discusses these overheads.

Beside those overheads, the cost of managing additional tunnels is trivial. Whether your gateway supports one tunnel or ten just does not matter. A hundred might be a problem; there is a section on this in the performance document.

So, in nearly all cases, if using multiple tunnels gives you a reasonable way to describe what you need to do, you should describe it that way in your configuration files.

For example, one user recently asked on a mailing list about this network configuration:

            netA---gwA---gwB---netB
                                |----netC

       netA and B are secured netC not.
       netA and gwA can not access netC

The user had constructed only one tunnel, netA to netB, and wanted to know how to use ip-route to get netC packets into it. This is entirely unnecessary. One of the replies was:

      The simplest way and indeed the right way to
      solve this problem is to set up two connections:

            leftsubnet=NetA
            left=gwA
            right=gwB
            rightsubnet=NetB
      and
            leftsubnet=NetA
            left=gwA
            right=gwB
            rightsubnet=NetC

This would still be correct even if we added nets D, E, F, ... to the above diagram and needed twenty tunnels.

Of course another possibility would be to just use one tunnel, with a subnet mask that includes both netB and netC (or B, C, D, ...). See next section.

In general, you can construct as many tunnels as you need. Networks like netC in this example that do not connect directly to the gateway are fine, as long as the gateway can route to them.

The number of tunnels can become an issue if it reaches 50 or so. This is discussed in the performance document. Look there for information on supporting hundreds of Road Warriors from one gateway.

If you find yourself with too many tunnels for some reason like having eight subnets at one location and nine at another so you end up with 9*8=72 tunnels, read the next section here.

### Subnet sizes

The subnets used in leftsubnet and rightsubnet can be of any size that fits your needs, and they need not correspond to physical networks.

You adjust the size by changing the subnet mask, the number after the slash in the subnet description. For example

- in 192.168.100.0/24 the /24 mask says 24 bits are used to designate the network. This leave 8 bits to label machines. This subnet has 256 addresses. .0 and .255 are reserved, so it can have 254 machines.
- A subnet with a /23 mask would be twice as large, 512 addresses.
- A subnet with a /25 mask would be half the size, 128 addresses.
- /0 is the whole Internet
- /32 is a single machine

As an example of using these in connection descriptions, suppose your company's head office has four physical networks using the address ranges:

192.168.100.0/24
  development
192.168.101.0/24
  production
192.168.102.0/24
  marketing
192.168.103.0/24
  administration

You can use exactly those subnets in your connection descriptions, or use larger subnets to grant broad access if required:

leftsubnet=192.168.100.0/24
  remote hosts can access only development
leftsubnet=192.168.100.0/23
  remote hosts can access development or production
leftsubnet=192.168.102.0/23
  remote hosts can access marketing or administration
leftsubnet=192.168.100.0/22
  remote hosts can access any of the four departments

or use smaller subnets to restrict access:

leftsubnet=192.168.103.0/24
  remote hosts can access any machine in administration
leftsubnet=192.168.103.64/28
  remote hosts can access only certain machines in administration.
leftsubnet=192.168.103.42/32
  remote hosts can access only one particular machine in administration

To be exact, 192.68.103.64/28 means all addresses whose top 28 bits match 192.168.103.64. There are 16 of these because there are 16 possibilities for the remainingg 4 bits. Their addresses are 192.168.103.64 to 192.168.103.79.

Each connection description can use a different subnet if required.

It is possible to use all the examples above on the same FreeS/WAN gateway, each in a different connection description, perhaps for different classes of user or for different remote offices.

It is also possible to have multiple tunnels using different leftsubnet descriptions with the same right. For example, when the marketing manager is on the road he or she might have access to:

leftsubnet=192.168.102.0/24
  all machines in marketing
192.168.101.32/29
  some machines in production
leftsubnet=192.168.103.42/32
  one particular machine in administration

This takes three tunnels, but tunnels are cheap. If the laptop is set up to build all three tunnels automatically, then he or she can access all these machines concurrently, perhaps from different windows.

### Other network layouts

Here is the usual network picture for a site-to-site VPN::

         Sunset==========West------------------East=========Sunrise
               local net       untrusted net       local net

and for the Road Warrior::

                                               telecommuter's PC or
                                               traveller's laptop
         Sunset==========West------------------East
             corporate LAN     untrusted net

Other configurations are also possible.

#### The Internet as a big subnet

A telecommuter might have:

         Sunset==========West------------------East ================= firewall --- the Internet
             home network      untrusted net        corporate network

This can be described as a special case of the general subnet-to-subnet connection. The subnet on the right is 0.0.0.0/0, the whole Internet.

West (the home gateway) can have its firewall rules set up so that only IPsec packets to East are allowed out. It will then behave as if its only connection to the world was a wire to East.

When machines on the home network need to reach the Internet, they do so via the tunnel, East and the corporate firewall. From the viewpoint of the Internet (perhaps of some EvilDoer trying to break in!), those home office machines are behind the firewall and protected by it.

#### Wireless

Another possible configuration comes up when you do not trust the local network, either because you have very high security standards or because your are using easily-intercepted wireless signals.

Some wireless networks have built-in encryption called WEP, but its security is dubious. It is a fairly common practice to use IPsec instead.

In this case, part of your network may look like this:

              West-----------------------------East == the rest of your network
         workstation   untrusted wireless net

Of course, there would likely be several wireless workstations, each with its own IPsec tunnel to the East gateway.

The connection descriptions look much like Road Warrior descriptions:

- each workstation should have its own unique
  - identifier for IPsec
  - RSA key
  - connection description.
- on the gateway, use left=%any, or the workstation IP address
- on workstations, left=%defaultroute, or the workstation IP address
- leftsubnet= is not used.

The rightsubnet= parameter might be set in any of several ways:

rightsubnet=0.0.0.0/0
  allowing workstations to access the entire Internet (see above)
rightsubnet=a.b.c.0/24
  allowing access to your entire local network
rightsubnet=a.b.c.d/32
  restricting the workstation to connecting to a particular server

Of course you can mix and match these as required. For example, a university might allow faculty full Internet access while letting student laptops connect only to a group of lab machines.

## Choosing connection types

One choice you need to make before configuring additional connections is what type or types of connections you will use. There are several options, and you can use more than one concurrently.

### Manual vs. automatic keying

IPsec allows two types of connections, with manual or automatic keying. FreeS/WAN starts them with commands such as:

            ipsec manual --up name
            ipsec auto --up name

The difference is in how they are keyed.

Manually keyed connections
  use keys stored in ipsec.conf.
Automatically keyed connections
  use keys automatically generated by the Pluto key negotiation daemon. The key negotiation protocol, IKE, must authenticate the other system. (It is vulnerable to a man-in-the-middle attack if used without authentication.) We currently support two authentication methods:
  - using shared secrets stored in ipsec.secrets.
  - RSA public key authentication, with our machine's private key in ipsec.secrets. Public keys for other machines may either be placed in ipsec.conf or provided via DNS.

  A third method, using RSA keys embedded in X.509 certtificates, is provided by user patches.

Manually keyed connections provide weaker security than automatically keyed connections. An opponent who reads ipsec.secrets(5) gets your encryption key and can read all data encrypted by it. If he or she has an archive of old messages, all of them back to your last key change are also readable.

With automatically-(re)-keyed connections, an opponent who reads ipsec.secrets(5) gets the key used to authenticate your system in IKE -- the shared secret or your private key, depending what authentication mechanism is in use. However, he or she does not automatically gain access to any encryption keys or any data.

An attacker who has your authentication key can mount a man-in-the-middle attack and, if that succeeds, he or she will get encryption keys and data. This is a serious danger, but it is better than having the attacker read everyting as soon as he or she breaks into ipsec.secrets(5).. Moreover, the keys change often so an opponent who gets one key does not get a large amount of data. To read all your data, he or she would have to do a man-in-the-middle attack at every key change.

We discuss using manual keying in production below, but this is not recommended except in special circumstances, such as needing to communicate with some implementation that offers no auto-keyed mode compatible with FreeS/WAN.

Manual keying may also be useful for testing. There is some discussion of this in our FAQ.

### Authentication methods for auto-keying

The IKE protocol which Pluto uses to negotiate connections between gateways must use some form of authentication of peers. A gateway must know who it is talking to before it can create a secure connection. We support two basic methods for this authentication:

- shared secrets, stored in ipsec.secrets(5)
- RSA authentication

There are, howver, several variations on the RSA theme, using different methods of managing the RSA keys:

- our RSA private key in ipsec.secrets(5) with other gateways' public keys
  either
    stored in ipsec.conf(5)
  or
    looked up via DNS
- authentication with x.509 certificates.; See our links section for information on user-contributed patches for this.:

Public keys in ipsec.conf(5) give a reasonably straightforward method of specifying keys for explicitly configured connections.

Putting public keys in DNS allows us to support opportunistic encryption. Any two FreeS/WAN gateways can provide secure communication, without either of them having any preset information about the other.

X.509 certificates may be required to interface to various PKIs.

### Advantages of public key methods

Authentication with a public key method such as RSA has some important advantages over using shared secrets.

- no problem of secure transmission of secrets
  - A shared secret must be shared, so you have the problem of transmitting it securely to the other party. If you get this wrong, you have no security.
  - With a public key technique, you transmit only your public key. The system is designed to ensure that it does not matter if an enemy obtains public keys. The private key never leaves your machine.
- easier management
  - Suppose you have 20 branch offices all connecting to one gateway at head office, and all using shared secrets. Then the head office admin has 20 secrets to manage. Each of them must be kept secret not only from outsiders, but also from 19 of the branch office admins. The branch office admins have only one secret each to manage.

    If the branch offices need to talk to each other, this becomes problematic. You need another 20*19/2 = 190 secrets for branch-to-branch communication, each known to exactly two branches. Now all the branch admins have the headache of handling 20 keys, each shared with exactly one other branch or with head office.

    For larger numbers of branches, the number of connections and secrets increases quadratically and managing them becomes a nightmare. A 1000-gateway fully connected network needs 499,500 secrets, each known to exactly two players. There are ways to reduce this problem, for example by introducing a central key server, but these involve additional communication overheads, more administrative work, and new threats that must be carefully guarded against.

  - With public key techniques, the only thing you have to keep secret is your private key, and you keep that secret from everyone.

    As network size increaes, the number of public keys used increases linearly with the number of nodes. This still requires careful administration in large applications, but is nothing like the disaster of a quadratic increase. On a 1000-gateway network, you have 1000 private keys, each of which must be kept secure on one machine, and 1000 public keys which must be distributed. This is not a trivial problem, but it is manageable.

- does not require fixed IP addresses
  - When shared secrets are used in IPsec, the responder must be able to tell which secret to use by looking at the IP address on the incoming packets. When the other parties do not have a fixed IP address to be identified by (for example, on nearly all dialup ISP connections and many cable or ADSL links), this does not work well -- all must share the same secret!
  - When RSA authentication is in use, the initiator can identify itself by name before the key must be determined. The responder then checks that the message is signed with the public key corresponding to that name.

There is also a disadvantage:

- your private key is a single point of attack, extremely valuable to an enemy
  - with shared secrets, an attacker who steals your ipsec.secrets file can impersonate you or try man-in-the-middle attacks, but can only attack connections described in that file
  - an attacker who steals your private key gains the chance to attack not only existing connections but also any future connections created using that key

This is partly counterbalanced by the fact that the key is never transmitted and remains under your control at all times. It is likely necessary, however, to take account of this in setting security policy. For example, you should change gateway keys when an administrator leaves the company, and should change them periodically in any case.

Overall, public key methods are more secure, more easily managed and more flexible. We recommend that they be used for all connections, unless there is a compelling reason to do otherwise.

## Using shared secrets in production

Generally, public key methods are preferred for reasons given above, but shared secrets can be used with no loss of security, just more work and perhaps more need to take precautions.

What I call "shared secrets" are sometimes also called "pre-shared keys". They are used only for for authentication, never for encryption. Calling them "pre-shared keys" has confused some users into thinking they were encryption keys, so I prefer to avoid the term..

If you are interoperating with another IPsec implementation, you may find its documentation calling them "passphrases".

### Putting secrets in ipsec.secrets(5)

If shared secrets are to be used to authenticate communication for the Diffie-Hellman key exchange in the IKE protocol, then those secrets must be stored in /etc/ipsec.secrets. For details, see the ipsec.secrets(5) man page.

A few considerations are vital:

- make the secrets long and unguessable. Since they need not be remembered by humans, very long ugly strings may be used. We suggest using our ipsec_ranbits(8) utility to generate long (128 bits or more) random strings.
- transmit secrets securely. You have to share them with other systems, but you lose if they are intercepted and used against you. Use PGP, SSH, hand delivery of a floppy disk which is then destroyed, or some other trustworthy method to deliver them.
- store secrets securely, in root-owned files with permissions rw------.
- limit sharing of secrets. Alice, Bob, Carol and Dave may all talk to each other, but only Alice and Bob should know the secret for an Alice-Bob link.
- do not share private keys. The private key for RSA authentication of your system is stored in ipsec.secrets(5), but it is a different class of secret from the pre-shared keys used for the "shared secret" authentication. No-one but you should have the RSA private key.

Each line has the IP addresses of the two gateways plus the secret. It should look something like this:

            10.0.0.1 11.0.0.1 : PSK "jxTR1lnmSjuj33n4W51uW3kTR55luUmSmnlRUuWnkjRj3UuTV4T3USSu23Uk55nWu5TkTUnjT"

PSK indicates the use of a pre-shared key. The quotes and the whitespace shown are required.

You can use any character string as your secret. For security, it should be both long and extremely hard to guess. We provide a utility to generate such strings, ipsec_ranbits(8).

You want the same secret on the two gateways used, so you create a line with that secret and the two gateway IP addresses. The installation process supplies an example secret, useful only for testing. You must change it for production use.

### File security

You must deliver this file, or the relevant part of it, to the other gateway machine by some secure means. Don't just FTP or mail the file! It is vital that the secrets in it remain secret. An attacker who knew those could easily have all the data on your "secure" connection.

This file must be owned by root and should have permissions rw-------.

### Shared secrets for road warriors

You can use a shared secret to support a single road warrior connecting to your gateway, and this is a reasonable thing to do in some circumstances. Public key methods have advantages, discussed above, but they are not critical in this case.

To do this, the line in ipsec.secrets(5) is something like:

            10.0.0.1 0.0.0.0 : PSK "jxTR1lnmSjuj33n4W51uW3kTR55luUmSmnlRUuWnkjRj3UuTV4T3USSu23Uk55nWu5TkTUnjT"

where the 0.0.0.0 means that any IP address is acceptable.

For more than one road warrior, shared secrets are not recommended. If shared secrets are used, then when the responder needs to look up the secret, all it knows about the sender is an IP address. This is fine if the sender is at a fixed IP address specified in the config file. It is also fine if only one road warrior uses the wildcard 0.0.0.0 address. However, if you have more than one road warrior using shared secret authentication, then they must all use that wildcard and therefore all road warriors using PSK autentication must use the same secret. Obviously, this is insecure.

For multiple road warriors, use public key authentication. Each roadwarrior can then have its own identity (our leftid= or rightid= parameters), its own public/private key pair, and its own secure connection.

## Using manual keying in production

Generally, automatic keying is preferred over manual keying for production use because it is both easier to manage and more secure. Automatic keying frees the admin from much of the burden of managing keys securely, and can provide perfect forward secrecy. This is discussed in more detail above.

However, it is possible to use manual keying in production if that is what you want to do. This might be necessary, for example, in order to interoperate with some device that either does not provide automatic keying or provides it in some version we cannot talk to.

Note that with manual keying all security rests with the keys. If an adversary acquires your keys, you've had it. He or she can read everything ever sent with those keys, including old messages he or she may have archived.

You need to be really paranoid about keys if you're going to rely on manual keying for anything important.

- keep keys in files with 600 permissions, owned by root
- be extremely careful about security of your gateway systems. Anyone who breaks into a gateway and gains root privileges can get all your keys and read everything ever encrypted with those keys, both old messages he has archived and any new ones you may send.
- change keys regularly. This can be a considerable bother, (and provides an excellent reason to consider automatic keying instead), but it is absolutely essential for security. Consider a manually keyed system in which you leave the same key in place for months:
  - an attacker can have a very large sample of text sent with that key to work with. This makes various cryptographic attacks much more likely to succeed.
  - The chances of the key being compromised in some non-cryptographic manner -- a spy finds it on a discarded notepad, someone breaks into your server or your building and steals it, a staff member is bribed, tricked, seduced or coerced into revealing it, etc. -- also increase over time.
  - a successful attacker can read everything ever sent with that key. This makes any successful attack extremely damaging.
  It is clear that you must change keys often to have any useful security. The only question is how often.
- use PGP or SSH for all key transfers
- don't edit files with keys in them when someone can look over your shoulder
- worry about network security; could someone get keys by snooping packets on the LAN between your X desktop and the gateway?
- lock up your backup tapes for the gateway system
- ... and so on

Linux FreeS/WAN provides some facilities to help with this. In particular, it is good policy to keep keys in separate files so you can edit configuration information in /etc/ipsec.conf without exposing keys to "shoulder surfers" or network snoops. We support this with the also= and include syntax in ipsec.conf(5).

See the last example in our examples file. In the /etc/ipsec.conf conn samplesep section, it has the line:

            also=samplesep-keys

which tells the "ipsec manual" script to insert the configuration description labelled "samplesep-keys" if it can find it. The /etc/ipsec.conf file must also have a line such as:

    include ipsec.*.conf

which tells it to read other files. One of those other files then might contain the additional data:

    conn samplesep-keys
      spi=0x200
      esp=3des-md5-96
      espenckey=0x01234567_89abcdef_02468ace_13579bdf_12345678_9abcdef0
      espauthkey=0x12345678_9abcdef0_2468ace0_13579bdf

The first line matches the label in the "also=" line, so the indented lines are inserted. The net effect is exactly as if the inserted lines had occurred in the original file in place of the "also=" line.

Variables set here are:

spi
  A number needed by the manual keying code. Any 3-digit hex number will do, but if you have more than one manual connection then spi must be different for each connection.
esp
  Options for ESP (Encapsulated Security Payload), the usual IPsec encryption mode. Settings here are for encryption using triple DES and authentication using MD5. Note that encryption without authentication should not be used; it is insecure.
espenkey
  Key for ESP encryption. Here, a 192-bit hex number for triple DES.
espauthkey
  Key for ESP authentication. Here, a 128-bit hex number for MD5.

Note that the example keys we supply are intended only for testing. For real use, you should go to automatic keying. If that is not possible, create your own keys for manual mode and keep them secret

Of course, any files containing keys must have 600 permissions and be owned by root.

If you connect in this way to multiple sites, we recommend that you keep keys for each site in a separate file and adopt some naming convention that lets you pick them all up with a single "include" line. This minimizes the risk of losing several keys to one error or attack and of accidentally giving another site admin keys which he or she has no business knowing.

Also note that if you have multiple manually keyed connections on a single machine, then the spi parameter must be different for each one. Any 3-digit hex number is OK, provided they are different for each connection. We reserve the range 0x100 to 0xfff for manual connections. Pluto assigns SPIs from 0x1000 up for automatically keyed connections.

If ipsec.conf(5) contains keys for manual mode connections, then it too must have permissions rw-------. We recommend instead that, if you must manual keying in production, you keep the keys in separate files.

Note also that ipsec.conf is installed with permissions rw-r--r--. If you plan to use manually keyed connections for anything more than initial testing, you must:

- either change permissions to rw-------
- or store keys separately in secure files and access them via include statements in ipsec.conf.

We recommend the latter method for all but the simplest configurations.

### Creating keys with ranbits

You can create new random keys with the ranbits(8) utility. For example, the commands:

          umask 177
          ipsec ranbits 192  > temp
          ipsec ranbits 128 >> temp

create keys in the sizes needed for our default algorithms:

- 192-bit key for 3DES encryption
  (only 168 bits are used; parity bits are ignored)
- 128-bit key for keyed MD5 authentication

If you want to use SHA instead of MD5, that requires a 160-bit key

Note that any temporary files used must be kept secure since they contain keys. That is the reason for the umask command above. The temporary file should be deleted as soon as you are done with it. You may also want to change the umask back to its default value after you are finished working on keys.

The ranbits utility may pause for a few seconds if not enough entropy is available immediately. See ipsec_ranbits(8) and random(4) for details. You may wish to provide some activity to feed entropy into the system. For example, you might move the mouse around, type random characters, or do du /usr > /dev/null in the background.

## Setting up connections at boot time

You can tell the system to set up connections automatically at boot time by putting suitable stuff in /etc/ipsec.conf on both systems. The relevant section of the file is labelled by a line reading config setup.

Details can be found in the ipsec.conf(5) man page. We also provide a file of example configurations.

The most likely options are something like:

interfaces="ipsec0=eth0 ipsec1=ppp0"
  Tells KLIPS which interfaces to use. Up to four interfaces numbered ipsec[0-3] are supported. Each interface can support an arbitrary number of tunnels.

  Note that for PPP, you give the ppp[0-9] device name here, not the underlying device such as modem (or eth1 if you are using PPPoE).

interfaces=%defaultroute
  Alternative setting, useful in simple cases. KLIPS will pick up both its interface and the next hop information from the settings of the Linux default route.
forwardcontrol=no
  Normally "no". Set to "yes" if the IP forwarding option is disabled in your network configuration. (This can be set as a kernel configuration option or later. e.g. on Redhat, it's in /etc/sysconfig/network and on SuSE you can adjust it with Yast.) Linux FreeS/WAN will then enable forwarding when starting up and turn it off when going down. This is used to ensure that no packets will be forwarded before IPsec comes up and takes control.
syslog=daemon.error
  Used in messages to the system logging daemon (syslogd) to specify what type of software is sending the messages. If the settings are "daemon.error" as in our example, then syslogd treats the messages as error messages from a daemon.

  Note that Pluto does not currently pay attention to this variable. The variable controls setup messages only.

klipsdebug=
  Debug settings for KLIPS.
plutodebug=
  Debug settings for Pluto.
... for both the above DEBUG settings
  Normally, leave empty as shown above for no debugging output.
  Use "all" for maximum information.
  See ipsec_klipsdebug(8) and ipsec_pluto(8) man page for other options. Beware that if you set /etc/ipsec.conf to enable debug output, your system's log files may get large quickly.
dumpdir=/safe/directory
  Normally, programs started by ipsec setup don't crash. If they do, by default, no core dump will be produced because such dumps would contain secrets. If you find you need to debug such crashes, you can set dumpdir to the name of a directory in which to collect the core file.
manualstart=
  List of manually keyed connections to be automatically started at boot time. Useful for testing, but not for long term use. Connections which are automatically started should also be automatically re-keyed.
pluto=yes
  Whether to start Pluto when ipsec startup is done.
  This parameter is optional and defaults to "yes" if not present.

  "yes" is strongly recommended for production use so that the keying daemon (Pluto) will automatically re-key the connections regularly. The ipsec-auto parameters ikelifetime, ipseclifetime and reykeywindow give you control over frequency of rekeying.

plutowait=no
  Controls whether Pluto waits for one tunnel to be established before starting to negotiate the next. You might set this to "yes"
  - if your gateway is a very limited machine and you need to conserve resources.
  - for debugging; the logs are clearer if only one connection is brought up at a time
  For a busy and resource-laden production gateway, you likely want "no" so that connections are brought up in parallel and the whole process takes less time.

The example assumes you are at the Reno office and will use IPsec to Vancouver, New York City and Amsterdam.

## Multiple tunnels between the same two gateways

Consider a pair of subnets, each with a security gateway, connected via the Internet:

             192.168.100.0/24           left subnet
                  |
             192.168.100.1
             North Gateway
             101.101.101.101            left
                  |
             101.101.101.1              left next hop
             [Internet]
             202.202.202.1              right next hop
                  |
             202.202.202.202            right
             South gateway
             192.168.200.1
                  |
             192.168.200.0/24           right subnet

A tunnel specification such as:

    conn northnet-southnet
          left=101.101.101.101
          leftnexthop=101.101.101.1
          leftsubnet=192.168.100.0/24
          leftfirewall=yes
          right=202.202.202.202
          rightnexthop=202.202.202.1
          rightsubnet=192.168.200.0/24
          rightfirewall=yes

will allow machines on the two subnets to talk to each other. You might test this by pinging from polarbear (192.168.100.7) to penguin (192.168.200.5).

However, this does not cover other traffic you might want to secure. To handle all the possibilities, you might also want these connection descriptions:

    conn northgate-southnet
          left=101.101.101.101
          leftnexthop=101.101.101.1
          right=202.202.202.202
          rightnexthop=202.202.202.1
          rightsubnet=192.168.200.0/24
          rightfirewall=yes

    conn northnet-southgate
          left=101.101.101.101
          leftnexthop=101.101.101.1
          leftsubnet=192.168.100.0/24
          leftfirewall=yes
          right=202.202.202.202
          rightnexthop=202.202.202.1

Without these, neither gateway can do IPsec to the remote subnet. There is no IPsec tunnel or eroute set up for the traffic.

In our example, with the non-routable 192.168.* addresses used, packets would simply be discarded. In a different configuration, with routable addresses for the remote subnet, they would be sent unencrypted since there would be no IPsec eroute and there would be a normal IP route.

You might also want:

    conn northgate-southgate
          left=101.101.101.101
          leftnexthop=101.101.101.1
          right=202.202.202.202
          rightnexthop=202.202.202.1

This is required if you want the two gateways to speak IPsec to each other.

This requires a lot of duplication of details. Judicious use of also= and include can reduce this problem.

Note that, while FreeS/WAN supports all four tunnel types, not all implementations do. In particular, some versions of Windows 2000 and the freely downloadable version of PGP provide only "client" functionality. You cannot use them as gateways with a subnet behind them. To get that functionality, you must upgrade to Windows 2000 server or the commercially available PGP products.

### One tunnel plus advanced routing

It is also possible to use the new routing features in 2.2 and later kernels to avoid most needs for multple tunnels. Here is one mailing list message on the topic:

    Subject: Re: linux-ipsec: IPSec packets not entering tunnel?
       Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2000
       From: Justin Guyett <jfg@sonicity.com>

    On Mon, 20 Nov 2000, Claudia Schmeing wrote:

    > Right                                                         Left
    >                      "home"                "office"
    > 10.92.10.0/24 ---- 24.93.85.110 ========= 216.175.164.91 ---- 10.91.10.24/24
    >
    > I've created all four tunnels, and can ping to test each of them,
    > *except* homegate-officenet.

    I keep wondering why people create all four tunnels.  Why not route
    traffic generated from home to 10.91.10.24/24 out ipsec0 with iproute2?
    And 99% of the time you don't need to access "office" directly, which
    means you can eliminate all but the subnet<->subnet connection.

and FreeS/WAN technical lead Henry Spencer's comment:

    > I keep wondering why people create all four tunnels.  Why not route
    > traffic generated from home to 10.91.10.24/24 out ipsec0 with iproute2?

    This is feasible, given some iproute2 attention to source addresses, but
    it isn't something we've documented yet... (partly because we're still
    making some attempt to support 2.0.xx kernels, which can't do this, but
    mostly because we haven't caught up with it yet).

    > And 99% of the time you don't need to access "office" directly, which
    > means you can eliminate all but the subnet<->subnet connection.

    Correct in principle, but people will keep trying to ping to or from the
    gateways during testing, and sometimes they want to run services on the
    gateway machines too.

## An Opportunistic Gateway

### Start from full opportunism

Full opportunism allows you to initiate and receive opportunistic connections on your machine. The remaining instructions in this section assume you have first set up full opportunism on your gateway using these instructions. Both sets of instructions require mailing DNS records to your ISP. You may wish to collect DNS records for both the gateway and the subnet nodes before contacting your ISP.

### Reverse DNS TXT records for each protected machine

You need these so that your Opportunistic peers can:

- discover the gateway's address, knowing only the IP address that packets are bound for
- verify that the gateway is authorised to encrypt for that endpoint

On the gateway, generate a TXT record with:

        ipsec showhostkey --txt 192.0.2.11

Use your gateway address in place of 192.0.2.11.

You should see (keys are trimmed for clarity throughout our example):

        ; RSA 2048 bits  gateway.example.com   Sat Apr 15 13:53:22 2000
        IN TXT  "X-IPsec-Server(10)=192.0.2.11" " AQOF8tZ2...+buFuFn/"

This MUST BE the same key as in your gateway's TXT record, or nothing will work.

In a text file, make one copy of this TXT record for each subnet node:

        ; RSA 2048 bits  gateway.example.com   Sat Apr 15 13:53:22 2000
        IN TXT  "X-IPsec-Server(10)=192.0.2.11" " AQOF8tZ2...+buFuFn/"

        ; RSA 2048 bits  gateway.example.com   Sat Apr 15 13:53:22 2000
        IN TXT  "X-IPsec-Server(10)=192.0.2.11" " AQOF8tZ2...+buFuFn/"

        ; RSA 2048 bits  gateway.example.com   Sat Apr 15 13:53:22 2000
        IN TXT  "X-IPsec-Server(10)=192.0.2.11" " AQOF8tZ2...+buFuFn/"

Above each entry, insert a line like this:

        98.2.0.192.in-addr.arpa. IN PTR arthur.example.com.

It must include:

- The subnet node's address in reverse map format. For example, 192.0.2.120 becomes 120.2.0.192.in-addr.arpa.. Note the final period.
- IN PTR
- The node's name, ie. arthur.example.com.. Note the final period.

The result will be a file of TXT records, like this:

        98.2.0.192.in-addr.arpa. IN PTR arthur.example.com.
        ; RSA 2048 bits  gateway.example.com   Sat Apr 15 13:53:22 2000
        IN TXT  "X-IPsec-Server(10)=192.0.2.11" " AQOF8tZ2...+buFuFn/"

        99.2.0.192.in-addr.arpa. IN PTR ford.example.com.
        ; RSA 2048 bits  gateway.example.com   Sat Apr 15 13:53:22 2000
        IN TXT  "X-IPsec-Server(10)=192.0.2.11" " AQOF8tZ2...+buFuFn/"

        100.2.0.192.in-addr.arpa. IN PTR trillian.example.com.
        ; RSA 2048 bits  gateway.example.com   Sat Apr 15 13:53:22 2000
        IN TXT  "X-IPsec-Server(10)=192.0.2.11" " AQOF8tZ2...+buFuFn/"

### Publish your records

Ask your ISP to publish all the reverse DNS records you have collected. There may be a delay of up to 48 hours as the records propagate.

### ...and test them

Check a couple of records with commands like this one:

        ipsec verify --host ford.example.com
        ipsec verify --host trillian.example.com

The verify command checks for TXT records for both the subnet host and its gateway. You should see output like:

        ...
        Looking for TXT in reverse map: 99.2.0.192.in-addr.arpa [OK]
        ...
        Looking for TXT in reverse map: 11.2.0.192.in-addr.arpa   [OK]
        ...
        Looking for TXT in reverse map: 100.2.0.192.in-addr.arpa [OK]
        ...
        Looking for TXT in reverse map: 11.2.0.192.in-addr.arpa   [OK]
        ...

### No Configuration Needed

FreeS/WAN 2.x ships with a built-in, automatically enabled OE connection conn packetdefault which applies OE, if possible, to all outbound traffic routed through the FreeS/WAN box. The ipsec.conf(5) manual describes this connection in detail. While the effect is much the same as private-or-clear, the implementation is different: notably, it does not use policy groups.

You can create more complex OE configurations for traffic forwarded through a FreeS/WAN box, as explained in our policy groups document, or disable OE using these instructions.

## Extruded Subnets

What we call extruded subnets are a special case of VPNs.

If your buddy has some unused IP addresses, in his subnet far off at the other side of the Internet, he can loan them to you... provided that the connection between you and him is fast enough to carry all the traffic between your machines and the rest of the Internet. In effect, he "extrudes" a part of his address space over the network to you, with your Internet traffic appearing to originate from behind his Internet gateway.

As far as the Internet is concerned, your new extruded net is behind your buddy's gateway. You route all your packets for the Internet at large out his gateway, and receive return packets the same way. You route your local packets locally.

Suppose your friend has a.b.c.0/24 and wants to give you a.b.c.240/28. The initial situation is:

        subnet           gateway          Internet
      a.b.c.0/24    a.b.c.1    p.q.r.s

where anything from the Internet destined for any machine in a.b.c.0/24 is routed via p.q.r.s and that gateway knows what to do from there.

Of course it is quite normal for various smaller subnets to exist behind your friend's gateway. For example, your friend's company might have a.b.c.16/28=development, a.b.c.32/28=marketing and so on. The Internet neither knows not cares about this; it just delivers packets to the p.q.r.s and lets the gateway do whatever needs to be done from there.

What we want to do is take a subnet, perhaps a.b.c.240/28, out of your friend's physical location while still having your friend's gateway route to it. As far as the Internet is concerned, you remain behind that gateway.

        subnet           gateway          Internet       your gate  extruded

      a.b.c.0/24   a.b.c.1     p.q.r.s              d.e.f.g         a.b.c.240/28

                               ========== tunnel ==========

The extruded addresses have to be a complete subnet.

In our example, the friend's security gateway is also his Internet gateway, but this is not necessary. As long as all traffic from the Internet to his addresses passes through the Internet gate, the security gate could be a machine behind that. The IG would need to route all traffic for the extruded subnet to the SG, and the SG could handle the rest.

First, configure your subnet using the extruded addresses. Your security gateway's interface to your subnet needs to have an extruded address (possibly using a Linux virtual interface, if it also has to have a different address). Your gateway needs to have a route to the extruded subnet, pointing to that interface. The other machines at your site need to have addresses in that subnet, and default routes pointing to your gateway.

If any of your friend's machines need to talk to the extruded subnet, they need to have a route for the extruded subnet, pointing at his gateway.

Then set up an IPsec subnet-to-subnet tunnel between your gateway and his, with your subnet specified as the extruded subnet, and his subnet specified as "0.0.0.0/0".

The tunnel description should be:

    conn extruded
            left=p.q.r.s
            leftsubnet=0.0.0.0/0
            right=d.e.f.g
            rightsubnet=a.b.c.0/28

If either side was doing firewalling for the extruded subnet before the IPsec connection is set up, you'll need to poke holes in your firewall to allow packets through.

And it all just works. Your SG routes traffic for 0.0.0.0/0 -- that is, the whole Internet -- through the tunnel to his SG, which then sends it onward as if it came from his subnet. When traffic for the extruded subnet arrives at his SG, it gets sent through the tunnel to your SG, which passes it to the right machine.

Remember that when ipsec_manual or ipsec_auto takes a connection down, it does not undo the route it made for that connection. This lets you take a connection down and bring up a new one, or a modified version of the old one, without having to rebuild the route it uses and without any risk of packets which should use IPsec accidentally going out in the clear. Because the route always points into KLIPS, the packets will always go there. Because KLIPS temporarily has no idea what to do with them (no eroute for them), they will be discarded.

If you do want to take the route down, this is what the "unroute" operation in manual and auto is for. Just do an unroute after doing the down.

Note that the route for a connection may have replaced an existing non-IPsec route. Nothing in Linux FreeS/WAN will put that pre-IPsec route back. If you need it back, you have to create it with the route command.

## Road Warrior with virtual IP address

Please note that Openswan now features DHCP-over-IPsec, which is an alternate procedure for Virtual IP address assignment.

Here is a mailing list message about another way to configure for road warrior support:

    Subject: Re: linux-ipsec: understanding the vpn
       Date: Thu, 28 Oct 1999 10:43:22 -0400
       From: Irving Reid <irving@nevex.com>

    >  local-------linux------internet------mobile
    >  LAN        box                         user
    >  ...

    >  now when the mobile user connects to the linux box
    >  it is given a virtual IP address, i have configured it to
    >  be in the 10.x.x.x range. mobile user and linux box
    >  have a tunnel between them with these IP addresses.

    >   Uptil this all is fine.

    If it is possible to configure your mobile client software *not* to
    use a virtual IP address, that will make your life easier. It is easier
    to configure FreeS/WAN to use the actual address the mobile user gets
    from its ISP.

    Unfortunately, some Windows clients don't let you choose.

    >  what i would like to know is that how does the mobile
    >  user communicate with other computers on the local
    >  LAN , of course with the vpn ?

    >   what IP address should the local LAN
    >  computers have ? I guess their default gateway
    >  should be the linux box ? and does the linux box need
    >  to be a 2 NIC card box or one is fine.

    As someone else stated, yes, the Linux box would usually be the default
    IP gateway for the local lan.

    However...

    If you mobile user has software that *must* use a virtual IP address,
    the whole picture changes. Nobody has put much effort into getting
    FreeS/WAN to play well in this environment, but here's a sketch of one
    approach:

    Local Lan 1.0.0.0/24
        |
        +- Linux FreeS/WAN 1.0.0.2
        |
        | 1.0.0.1
     Router
        | 2.0.0.1
        |
    Internet
        |
        | 3.0.0.1
    Mobile User
          Virtual Address: 1.0.0.3

    Note that the Local Lan network (1.0.0.x) can be registered, routable
    addresses.

    Now, the Mobile User sets up an IPSec security association with the
    Linux box (1.0.0.2); it should ESP encapsulate all traffic to the
    network 1.0.0.x **EXCEPT** UDP port 500. 500/udp is required for the key
    negotiation, which needs to work outside of the IPSec tunnel.

    On the Linux side, there's a bunch of stuff you need to do by hand (for
    now). FreeS/WAN should correctly handle setting up the IPSec SA and
    routes, but I haven't tested it so this may not work...

    The FreeS/WAN conn should look like:

    conn mobile
            right=1.0.0.2
            rightsubnet=1.0.0.0/24
            rightnexthop=1.0.0.1
            left=0.0.0.0  # The infamous "road warrior"
            leftsubnet=1.0.0.3/32

    Note that the left subnet contains *only* the remote host's virtual
    address.

    Hopefully the routing table on the FreeS/WAN box ends up looking like
    this:

    % netstat -rn
    Kernel IP routing table
    Destination     Gateway      Genmask         Flags   MSS Window  irtt Iface
    1.0.0.0         0.0.0.0      255.255.255.0   U      1500 0          0 eth0
    127.0.0.0       0.0.0.0      255.0.0.0       U      3584 0          0 lo
    0.0.0.0         1.0.0.1      0.0.0.0         UG     1500 0          0 eth0
    1.0.0.3         1.0.0.1      255.255.255.255 UG     1433 0          0 ipsec0

    So, if anybody sends a packet for 1.0.0.3 to the Linux box, it should
    get bundled up and sent through the tunnel. To get the packets for
    1.0.0.3 to the Linux box in the first place, you need to use "proxy
    ARP".

    How this works is: when a host or router on the local Ethernet segment
    wants to send a packet to 1.0.0.3, it sends out an Ethernet level
    broadcast "ARP request". If 1.0.0.3 was on the local LAN, it would
    reply, saying "send IP packets for 1.0.0.3 to my Ethernet address".

    Instead, you need to set up the Linux box so that _it_ answers ARP
    requests for 1.0.0.3, even though that isn't its IP address. That
    convinces everyone else on the lan to send 1.0.0.3 packets to the Linux
    box, where the usual FreeS/WAN processing and routing take over.

    % arp -i eth0 -s 1.0.0.3 -D eth0 pub

    This says, if you see an ARP request on interface eth0 asking for
    1.0.0.3, respond with the Ethernet address of interface eth0.

    Now, as I said at the very beginning, if it is *at all* possible to
    configure your client *not* to use the virtual IP address, you can avoid
    this whole mess.

## Dynamic Network Interfaces

Sometimes you have to cope with a situation where the network interface(s) aren't all there at boot. The common example is notebooks with PCMCIA.

### Basics

The key issue here is that the config setup section of the /etc/ipsec.conf configuration file lists the connection between ipsecN and hardware interfaces, in the interfaces= variable. At any time when ipsec setup start or ipsec setup restart is run this variable must correspond to the current real situation. More precisely, it must not mention any hardware interfaces which don't currently exist. The difficulty is that an ipsec setup start command is normally run at boot time so interfaces that are not up then are mis-handled.

### Boot Time

Normally, an ipsec setup start is run at boot time. However, if the hardware situation at boot time is uncertain, one of two things must be done.

- One possibility is simply not to have IPsec brought up at boot time. To do this:

              chkconfig --level 2345 ipsec off

  That's for modern Red Hats or other Linuxes with chkconfig. Systems which lack this will require fiddling with symlinks in /etc/rc.d/rc?.d or the equivalent.
- Another possibility is to bring IPsec up with no interfaces, which is less aesthetically satisfying but simpler. Just put

              interfaces=

  in the configuration file. KLIPS and Pluto will be started, but won't do anything.

### Change Time

When the hardware *is* in place, IPsec has to be made aware of it. Someday there may be a nice way to do this.

Right now, the way to do it is to fix the /etc/ipsec.conf file appropriately, so interfaces reflects the new situation, and then restart the IPsec subsystem. This does break any existing IPsec connections.

If IPsec wasn't brought up at boot time, do

            ipsec setup start

while if it was, do

            ipsec setup restart

which won't be as quick.

If some of the hardware is to be taken out, before doing that, amend the configuration file so interfaces no longer includes it, and do

            ipsec setup restart

Again, this breaks any existing connections.

## Unencrypted tunnels

FreeS/WAN does not support unencrypted tunnels. See this discussion.

One situation in which unencrypted tunnels might seem handy is when otherwise some data would be encrypted twice. Alice wants a secure tunnel from her machine to Bob's. Since she's behind one security gateway and he's behind another, part of the tunnel that they build passes through the tunnel that their site admins have built between the gateways. All of Alice and Bob's messages are encrypted twice.

There are several ways to handle this.

- Just accept the overhead of double encryption. The site admins might choose this if any of the following apply:
  - policy says encrypt everything (usually, it should)
  - they don't entirely trust Alice and Bob (usually, if they don't have to, they shouldn't)
  - if they don't feel the saved cycles are worth the time they'd need to build a non-encrypted tunnel for Alice and Bob's packets (often, they aren't)
- Use a plain IP-in-IP tunnel. These are not well documented. A good starting point is in the Linux kernel source tree, in /usr/src/linux/drivers/net/README.tunnel.

Note that if Alice and Bob want end-to-end security, they must build a tunnel end-to-end between their machines or use some other end-to-end tool such as PGP or SSL that suits their data. The only question is whether the admins build some special unencrypted tunnel for those already-encrypted packets.