From: "Jacques van Oene" <j.vanoene@chello.nl>
Newsgroups: sci.space.news
Subject: OFFICIAL PRESS about the findings of the commission established to analyze the causes of the Soyuz TMA-1
Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2003 18:46:30 +0200
Organization: Jet Propulsion Laboratory - Pasadena CA
Approved: sci-space-news@zagami.jpl.nasa.gov
Message-ID: <004601c329ef$af11ae80$d1cd5dd5@chello.nl>
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: nntp1.jpl.nasa.gov 1054658754 4012 137.78.16.91 (3 Jun 2003 16:45:54 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: news@newsfeed.jpl.nasa.gov
NNTP-Posting-Date: 3 Jun 2003 16:45:54 GMT
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200
Originator: daemon@zagami.jpl.nasa.gov
Xref: newsread1.funet.fi sci.space.news:13616

OFFICIAL PRESS RELEASE
about the findings of the commission established to analyze the causes of
the Soyuz TMA-1 descent vehicle returning to Earth in ballistic mode



May 26, 2003. Korolev, Moscow Region.
The findings of the technical commission established to analyze the causes
of the Soyuz TMA-1 descent vehicle returning to Earth in ballistic mode were
presented at a press conference held at S.P.Korolev Rocket and Space
Corporation Energia for journalists of Russian and international TV
companies and information agencies, as well as representatives from NASA and
European Space Agencies. The chairman of the commission is the First Deputy
General Designer of RSC Energia N.I.Zelenschikov. Present at the press
conference were members of the commission - managers and specialists from
RSC Energia, Federal Office of Aviation and Space Rescue and Recovery,
Gagarin Cosmonaut Training Center and TsNIIMash.
The commission made a statement that basically all of the new systems and
structural elements of the vehicle have been tested in flight during the
mission. Fully tested were: the new control panel, refrigerating and drying
units of the thermal control system, linear acceleration measuring unit,
descent vehicle structure, the system for recording and storing telemetry
and voice information and all the elements of landing system (baro unit,
automatic equipment, upgraded gamma-ray altimeter, soft-landing thrusters,
new seats). The new special computing unit KC020-M - the command unit of the
controlled descent loop - has not been tested to the full extent because the
descent vehicle switched from the automatic controlled descent mode into
ballistic descent mode. However, telemetry data have shown that this
computer unit, which was made to change from command mode into indication
mode during switching over to the ballistic descent, generated all the
necessary commands in accordance with its pre-programmed logic, so there
have been no anomalies in its behavior.
Establishing Soyuz TMA-1 in-orbit orientation, starting propulsion unit,
generating a retro burn, and running module separation operations have all
been performed in accordance with the program and technical documentation
and no anomalies have been found.
In the course of 183 seconds after separation of the spacecraft modules, the
descent vehicle was moving along the controlled descent trajectory.
Switching to the ballistic descent mode occurred automatically after the
Motion Control System (MCS) generated the command on the basis of the
spacecraft reaching the maximum allowable yaw angle. Operation of MCS and of
the landing equipment, as far as roll and pitch channels were concerned,
stayed within design limits.
The ballistic descent has been performed nominally, in accordance with the
pre-programmed control logic. The maximum g-loads during descent did not
exceed 8.1g. The descent vehicle landing system performed nominally and
g-loads stayed within the design limits.
The descent vehicle of Soyuz TMA-1 landed in its target point for ballistic
descent. The search and rescue service found the descent vehicle and the
crew within prescribed timeframe. No anomalies have been found in the
operation of the communications and direction finding systems during descent
and landing.
During the descent the crew of Soyuz TMA-1 performed all the necessary
monitoring and control operations in accordance with on-board instructions
and recommendations from the Lead Operations Control Team (LOCT) displaying
good teamwork and mutual understanding. The crew evinced high psychological
stability, endurance and self-control. High professionalism of N.M.Budarin
as the commander of the vehicle in this situation merits a special note
here.
The commission findings: the cause of switching to the ballistic descent
mode was an inadequate reaction of the descent control unit within the
descent control system to the signals from gyroscope KI00-18 and the angular
rate meter. As a result, the descent vehicle yawed to the limit angle, which
caused the gyroscope end switch to issue the command to switch to the
ballistic descent mode.
In the course of its work the commission has run tests on the descent
control unit. During its electrical tests within the descent vehicle brought
from the landing site to RSC Energia there have been many attempts to
simulate the situation that occurred in flight, but they failed to reproduce
it. Only when one channel of the unit was artificially disconnected, in one
case (out of forty) a situation was achieved which was close to the one in
flight.
The analysis has not revealed any connection between the situation and the
descent vehicle modifications that have been introduced. The MCS hardware as
far as the applicable control functions are concerned has not been modified
since Soyuz T (since 1979). The descent control unit has no electrical
interfaces with the newly added special computer unit and a unit for
measuring linear accelerations.
Tests of the descent control unit after its return to Earth have showed that
its electrical properties are fully compliant with the requirements of the
technical documentation. However, an in-depth analysis of the descent
control unit done in course of the commission activities revealed a
peculiarity of its electrical design, which could, under a very rare
combination of input signals in any of the three channels (pitch, yaw,
roll), could lead to disabling the signal and stopping output of commands to
the effectors. The occurrence of this problem is of very low likelihood,
which is born out by the 48 successful controlled descents of the Soyuz-type
vehicles, including the ones involving the descent control unit, which,
before it was installed on Soyuz TMA-1, has passed flight tests in Soyuz
TM-29 in 1999. The work to simulate and reproduce this situation in a
stand-alone electrical test setup for the descent control unit continues.
The analysis of the on-board documentation, mission control documentation,
LOCT actions, communication between search and rescue teams, MCC-M and the
crew has revealed some problems that have not significantly affected the
mission, but need to be resolved in the future.
The commission permits Soyuz TMA-2, currently operating in orbit within ISS,
to continue its mission without any reservations regarding the on-board
equipment of the spacecraft, however, it wants to draw attention to the need
to take into account its recommendations about actions of the crew and LOCT,
and communications between search and rescue team and MCC-M. The final
version of the commission's findings was submitted for approval.
It was recommended that, starting with Soyuz TMA-3, the descent control unit
be modified to introduce into it additional elements which will rule out the
unlikely but possible situation similar to the one that occurred.
After presenting the key findings of the commission, N.I. Zelenschikov,
managers and specialists on that commission, answered journalists'
questions, and then, together with them they visited the Corporation's test
and check-out facility, where they provided additional explanations of the
commission's findings and told about the progress of work under the
International Space Station project, including the on-going work at RSC
Energia to build Progress and Soyuz TMA-3 spacecraft in support of ISS
program for the year 2003.
The meeting continued for more than two hours.

----

Jacques :-)

Editor: www.spacepatches.info

------------------------------------------------------


