COSE H. Tschofenig Internet-Draft H-BRS Intended status: Standards Track O. Steele, Ed. Expires: 10 January 2025 Transmute D. Ajitomi bibital L. Lundblade Security Theory LLC 9 July 2024 Use of Hybrid Public-Key Encryption (HPKE) with CBOR Object Signing and Encryption (COSE) draft-ietf-cose-hpke-09 Abstract This specification defines hybrid public-key encryption (HPKE) for use with CBOR Object Signing and Encryption (COSE). HPKE offers a variant of public-key encryption of arbitrary-sized plaintexts for a recipient public key. HPKE works for any combination of an asymmetric key encapsulation mechanism (KEM), key derivation function (KDF), and authenticated encryption with additional data (AEAD) function. Authentication for HPKE in COSE is provided by COSE-native security mechanisms or by one of the authenticated variants of HPKE. This document defines the use of the HPKE with COSE. Status of This Memo This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79. Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet- Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/. Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." This Internet-Draft will expire on 10 January 2025. Tschofenig, et al. Expires 10 January 2025 [Page 1] Internet-Draft COSE HPKE July 2024 Copyright Notice Copyright (c) 2024 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved. This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/ license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Revised BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Revised BSD License. This document may contain material from IETF Documents or IETF Contributions published or made publicly available before November 10, 2008. The person(s) controlling the copyright in some of this material may not have granted the IETF Trust the right to allow modifications of such material outside the IETF Standards Process. Without obtaining an adequate license from the person(s) controlling the copyright in such materials, this document may not be modified outside the IETF Standards Process, and derivative works of it may not be created outside the IETF Standards Process, except to format it for publication as an RFC or to translate it into languages other than English. Table of Contents 1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 2. Conventions and Terminology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 3. HPKE for COSE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 3.1. Overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 3.1.1. HPKE Direct Encryption Mode . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 3.1.2. HPKE Key Encryption Mode . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 3.2. Key Representation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 4. Ciphersuite Registration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 4.1. COSE_Keys for COSE-HPKE Ciphersuites . . . . . . . . . . 11 5. Examples . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 5.1. HPKE Direct Encryption Mode . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 5.2. HPKE Key Encryption Mode . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 5.2.1. COSE_Encrypt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 5.2.2. COSE_MAC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 5.3. Key Representation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 5.3.1. KEM Public Key for HPKE-Base-P256-SHA256-A128GCM . . 18 5.3.2. KEM Private Key for HPKE-Base-P256-SHA256-A128GCM . . 18 5.3.3. KEM Public Key for HPKE-Base-X25519-SHA256-CHACHA20POLY1305 . . . . . . 19 6. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 Tschofenig, et al. Expires 10 January 2025 [Page 2] Internet-Draft COSE HPKE July 2024 7. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 7.1. COSE Algorithms Registry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 7.2. COSE Header Parameters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 8. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 8.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 8.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 Appendix A. Contributors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 Appendix B. Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 1. Introduction Hybrid public-key encryption (HPKE) [RFC9180] is a scheme that provides public key encryption of arbitrary-sized plaintexts given a recipient's public key. This document defines the use of the HPKE with COSE ([RFC9052], [RFC9053]). 2. Conventions and Terminology The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all capitals, as shown here. This specification uses the following abbreviations and terms: * Content-encryption key (CEK), a term defined in CMS [RFC2630]. * Hybrid Public Key Encryption (HPKE) is defined in [RFC9180]. * pkR is the public key of the recipient, as defined in [RFC9180]. * skR is the private key of the recipient, as defined in [RFC9180]. * Key Encapsulation Mechanism (KEM), see [RFC9180]. * Key Derivation Function (KDF), see [RFC9180]. * Authenticated Encryption with Associated Data (AEAD), see [RFC9180]. * Additional Authenticated Data (AAD), see [RFC9180]. 3. HPKE for COSE Tschofenig, et al. Expires 10 January 2025 [Page 3] Internet-Draft COSE HPKE July 2024 3.1. Overview This specification supports two modes of HPKE in COSE, namely * HPKE Direct Encryption mode, where HPKE is used to encrypt the plaintext. This mode can only be used with a single recipient. Section 3.1.1 provides the details. * HPKE Key Encryption mode, where HPKE is used to encrypt a content encryption key (CEK) and the CEK is subsequently used to encrypt the plaintext. This mode supports multiple recipients. Section 3.1.2 provides the details. In both cases a new COSE header parameter, called 'ek', is used to convey the content of the enc structure defined in the HPKE specification. "Enc" represents the serialized public key. For use with HPKE the 'ek' header parameter MUST be present in the unprotected header parameter and MUST contain the encapsulated key, which is output of the HPKE KEM, and it is a bstr. 3.1.1. HPKE Direct Encryption Mode With the HPKE Direct Encryption mode the information carried inside the COSE_recipient structure is embedded inside the COSE_Encrypt0. HPKE is used to directly encrypt the plaintext and the resulting ciphertext is either included in the COSE_Encrypt0 or is detached. If a payload is transported separately then it is called "detached content". A nil CBOR object is placed in the location of the ciphertext. See Section 5 of [RFC9052] for a description of detached payloads. The sender MUST set the alg parameter in the protected header, which indicates the use of HPKE. The sender MUST place the 'ek' (encapsulated key) parameter into the unprotected header. Although the use of the 'kid' parameter in COSE_Encrypt0 is discouraged by RFC 9052, this documents RECOMMENDS the use of the 'kid' parameter (or other parameters) to explicitly identify the static recipient public key used by the sender. If the COSE_Encrypt0 contains the 'kid' then the recipient may use it to select the appropriate private key. The HPKE specification describes an API and this API uses an "aad" parameter as input. When COSE_Encrypt0 is used then there is no AEAD function executed by COSE natively and HPKE offers this functionality. Tschofenig, et al. Expires 10 January 2025 [Page 4] Internet-Draft COSE HPKE July 2024 The "aad" parameter provided to the HPKE API is constructed as follows (and the design has been re-used from [RFC9052]): Enc_structure = [ context : "Encrypt0", protected : empty_or_serialized_map, external_aad : bstr ] empty_or_serialized_map = bstr .cbor header_map / bstr .size 0 The protected field in the Enc_structure contains the protected attributes from the COSE_Encrypt0 structure at layer 0, encoded in a bstr type. Figure 1 shows the COSE_Encrypt0 CDDL structure. COSE_Encrypt0_Tagged = #6.16(COSE_Encrypt0) ; Layer 0 COSE_Encrypt0 = [ Headers, ciphertext : bstr / nil, ] Figure 1: CDDL used for the HPKE Direct Encryption Mode The COSE_Encrypt0 MAY be tagged or untagged. An example is shown in Section 5.1. 3.1.2. HPKE Key Encryption Mode With the HPKE Key Encryption mode information is conveyed in the COSE_recipient structure, i.e. one COSE_recipient structure per recipient. In this approach the following layers are involved: * Layer 0 (corresponding to the COSE_Encrypt structure) contains the content (plaintext) encrypted with the CEK. This ciphertext may be detached, and if not detached, then it is included in the COSE_Encrypt structure. * Layer 1 (corresponding to a recipient structure) contains parameters needed for HPKE to generate a shared secret used to encrypt the CEK. This layer conveys the encrypted CEK in the encCEK structure. The protected header MUST contain the HPKE alg Tschofenig, et al. Expires 10 January 2025 [Page 5] Internet-Draft COSE HPKE July 2024 parameter and the unprotected header MUST contain the 'ek' parameter. The unprotected header MAY contain the kid parameter to identify the static recipient public key the sender has been using with HPKE. This two-layer structure is used to encrypt content that can also be shared with multiple parties at the expense of a single additional encryption operation. As stated above, the specification uses a CEK to encrypt the content at layer 0. 3.1.2.1. Recipient Encryption This describes the Recipient_structure. It serves instead of COSE_KDF_Context for COSE-HPKE recipients (and possibly other COSE algorithms defined outside this document). It MUST be used for COSE- HPKE recipients as it provides the protection for recipient protected headers. It is patterned after the Enc_structure in [RFC9052], but is specifically for a COSE_recipient, never a COSE_Encrypt. The COSE_KDF_Context MUST NOT be used in COSE-HPKE. Recipient_structure = [ context: "Recipient", next_layer_alg: int/tstr, recipient_protected_header: empty_or_serialize_map, recipient_aad: bstr ] * "next_layer_alg" is the algorithm ID of the COSE layer for which the COSE_recipient is encrypting a key. It is the algorithm that the key MUST be used with. This value MUST match the alg parameter in the next lower COSE layer. (This serves the same purpose as the alg ID in the COSE_KDF_Context. It also mitigates attacks where a person-in-the-middle changes the following layer algorithm from an AEAD algorithm to one that is not foiling the protection of the following layer headers). * "recipient_protected_header" contains the protected headers from the COSE_recipient CBOR-encoded deterministically with the "Core Deterministic Encoding Requirements", specified in Section 4.2.1 of RFC 8949 [STD94]. * "recipient_aad" contains any additional context the application wishes to protect. If none, it is a zero-length string. This is distinct from the external_aad for the whole COSE encrypt. It is per-recipient. Since it is not a header, it may be secret data that is not transmitted. It provides a means to convey many of the fields in COSE_KDF_Context. Tschofenig, et al. Expires 10 January 2025 [Page 6] Internet-Draft COSE HPKE July 2024 3.1.2.2. COSE-HPKE Recipient Construction This is the procedure for creating a COSE_recipient for COSE-HPKE. When a COSE_recipeint is constructed for a COSE-HPKE recipient, this is given as the "aad" parameter to the HPKE Seal() API. The "info" parameter to HPKE_Seal is not used with COSE_HPKE. The creation of the COSE_recipient is as follows: 1. Prepare a Recipient_structure 2. Obtain the key To used use by the next lowest layer 3. Pass in the following parameters to HPKE Seal API 1. Public key of recipient for "pKR" 2. Empty string for "info" 3. CBOR-encoded Recipient_structure for "aad" 4. The key for next lowest COSE layer for "pt" 4. The following are returned from the HPKE Seal API 1. The "enc" is placed in the "ek" header of the COSE_recipient 2. The "ct" is placed in the "ciphertext" field of the COSE_recipient The decoding and decryption of a COSE_recipient is as follows: 1. Prepare a Recipient_structure 2. Pass in the following parameters to HPKE Open API 1. The "ek" header for "enc" 2. Secret key for recipient for "sKR" 3. Empty string for "info" 4. CBOR-encoded Recipient_structure for "aad" 5. The cipher text from the COSE_recipient as "ct" Tschofenig, et al. Expires 10 January 2025 [Page 7] Internet-Draft COSE HPKE July 2024 3. What is returned from HPKE Open API is the key for the next lowest COSE layer It is not necessary to fill in recipient_aad as HPKE itself covers the attacks that recipient_aad (and COSE_KDF_Context (and SP800-56A)) are used to mitigate. COSE-HPKE use cases may use it for any purpose they wish, but it should generally be for small identifiers, context or secrets, not to protect bulk external data. Bulk external data should be protected at layer 0 with external_aad. The COSE_recipient structure, shown in Figure 2, is repeated for each recipient. COSE_Encrypt_Tagged = #6.96(COSE_Encrypt) / Layer 0 / COSE_Encrypt = [ Headers, ciphertext : bstr / nil, recipients : + COSE_recipient ] / Layer 1 / COSE_recipient = [ protected : bstr .cbor header_map, unprotected : header_map, encCEK : bstr, ] header_map = { Generic_Headers, * label => values, } Figure 2: CDDL used for the HPKE Key Encryption Mode The COSE_Encrypt MAY be tagged or untagged. When encrypting the content at layer 0 then the instructions in Section 5.3 of [RFC9052] MUST to be followed, which includes the calculation of the authenticated data strcture. An example is shown in Section 5.2. Tschofenig, et al. Expires 10 January 2025 [Page 8] Internet-Draft COSE HPKE July 2024 3.2. Key Representation The COSE_Key with the existing key types can be used to represent KEM private or public keys. When using a COSE_Key for COSE-HPKE, the following checks are made: * The "kty" field MUST be present, and it MUST be one of the key types for HPKE KEM. * If the "kty" field is "OKP" or "EC2", the "crv" field MUST be present and it MUST be a curve for HPKE KEM. * If the "alg" field is present, it MUST be one of the supported COSE-HPKE "alg" values and the key type of its KEM MUST match the "kty" field. If the "kty" field is "OKP" or "EC2", the curve of the KEM MUST match the "crv" field. The valid combinations of the "alg", "kty" and "crv" are shown in Figure 3. * If the "key_ops" field is present, it MUST include only "derive bits" for the private key and MUST be empty for the public key. Examples of the COSE_Key for COSE-HPKE are shown in Section 5.3. 4. Ciphersuite Registration A ciphersuite is a group of algorithms, often sharing component algorithms such as hash functions, targeting a security level. An HPKE ciphersuite, is composed of the following choices: * HPKE Mode * KEM Algorithm * KDF Algorithm * AEAD Algorithm The "KEM", "KDF", and "AEAD" values are chosen from the HPKE IANA registry [HPKE-IANA]. For readability the algorithm ciphersuites labels are built according to the following scheme: HPKE----- The "Mode" indicator may be populated with the following values from Table 1 of [RFC9180]: Tschofenig, et al. Expires 10 January 2025 [Page 9] Internet-Draft COSE HPKE July 2024 * "Base" refers to "mode_base" described in Section 5.1.1 of [RFC9180], which only enables encryption to the holder of a given KEM private key. * "PSK" refers to "mode_psk", described in Section 5.1.2 of [RFC9180], which authenticates using a pre-shared key. * "Auth" refers to "mode_auth", described in Section 5.1.3 of [RFC9180], which authenticates using an asymmetric key. * "Auth_Psk" refers to "mode_auth_psk", described in Section 5.1.4 of [RFC9180], which authenticates using both a PSK and an asymmetric key. For a list of ciphersuite registrations, please see Section 7. The following table summarizes the relationship between the ciphersuites registered in this document, which all use the "Base" mode and the values registered in the HPKE IANA registry [HPKE-IANA]. +--------------------------------------------------+------------------+ | COSE-HPKE | HPKE | | Cipher Suite Label | KEM | KDF | AEAD | +--------------------------------------------------+-----+-----+------+ | HPKE-Base-P256-SHA256-A128GCM |0x10 | 0x1 | 0x1 | | HPKE-Base-P384-SHA384-AS256GCM |0x11 | 0x2 | 0x2 | | HPKE-Base-P521-SHA512-AS256GCM |0x12 | 0x3 | 0x2 | | HPKE-Base-X25519-SHA256-A128GCM |0x20 | 0x1 | 0x1 | | HPKE-Base-X25519-SHA256-ChaCha20Poly1305 |0x20 | 0x1 | 0x3 | | HPKE-Base-X448-SHA512-AS256GCM |0x21 | 0x3 | 0x2 | | HPKE-Base-X448-SHA512-ChaCha20Poly1305 |0x21 | 0x3 | 0x3 | +--------------------------------------------------+-----+-----+------+ As the list indicates, the ciphersuite labels have been abbreviated at least to some extend to maintain the tradeoff between readability and length. The ciphersuite list above is a minimal starting point. Additional ciphersuites can be registered into the already existing registry. For example, once post-quantum cryptographic algorithms have been standardized it might be beneficial to register ciphersuites for use with COSE-HPKE. Additionally, ciphersuites utilizing the compact encoding of the public keys, as defined in [I-D.irtf-cfrg-dnhpke], may be standardized for use in constrained environments. Tschofenig, et al. Expires 10 January 2025 [Page 10] Internet-Draft COSE HPKE July 2024 As a guideline for ciphersuite submissions to the IANA CoSE algorithm registry, the designated experts must only register combinations of (KEM, KDF, AEAD) triple that consitute valid combinations for use with HPKE, the KDF used should (if possible) match one internally used by the KEM, and components should not be mixed between global and national standards. 4.1. COSE_Keys for COSE-HPKE Ciphersuites The COSE-HPKE ciphersuite uniquely determines the type of KEM for which a COSE_Key is used. The following mapping table shows the valid combinations of the COSE-HPKE ciphersuite, COSE_Key type and its curve. +---------------------+--------------+ | COSE-HPKE | COSE_Key | | Ciphersuite Label | kty | crv | +---------------------+-----+--------+ | HPKE-Base-P256-\* | EC2 | P-256 | | HPKE-Base-P384-\* | EC2 | P-384 | | HPKE-Base-P521-\* | EC2 | P-521 | | HPKE-Base-X25519-\* | OKP | X25519 | | HPKE-Base-X448-\* | OKP | X448 | | HPKE-Base-CP256-\* | EC2 | P-256 | | HPKE-Base-CP384-\* | EC2 | P-384 | | HPKE-Base-CP521-\* | EC2 | P-521 | +---------------------+-----+--------+ Figure 3: COSE_Key Types and Curves for COSE-HPKE Ciphersuites 5. Examples This section provides a set of examples that shows all COSE message types (COSE_Encrypt0, COSE_Encrypt and COSE_MAC) to which the COSE- HPKE can be applied, and also provides some examples of key representation for HPKE KEM. Each example of the COSE message includes the following information that can be used to check the interoperability of COSE-HPKE implementations: * plaintext: Original data of the encrypted payload. * external_aad: Externally supplied AAD. * skR: A recipient private key. Tschofenig, et al. Expires 10 January 2025 [Page 11] Internet-Draft COSE HPKE July 2024 * skE: An ephemeral sender private key paired with the encapsulated key. 5.1. HPKE Direct Encryption Mode This example assumes that a sender wants to communicate an encrypted payload to a single recipient in the most efficient way. An example of the HPKE Direct Encryption Mode is shown in Figure 4. Line breaks and comments have been inserted for better readability. This example uses the following: * alg: HPKE-Base-P256-SHA256-A128GCM * plaintext: "This is the content." * external_aad: "COSE-HPKE app" * skR: h'57c92077664146e876760c9520d054aa93c3afb04e306705db609030850 7b4d3' * skE: h'42dd125eefc409c3b57366e721a40043fb5a58e346d51c133128a772371 60218' 16([ / alg = HPKE-Base-P256-SHA256-A128GCM (Assumed: 35) / h'a1011823', { / kid / 4: h'3031', / ek / -4: h'045df24272faf43849530db6be01f42708b3c3a9 df8e268513f0a996ed09ba7840894a3fb946cb28 23f609c59463093d8815a7400233b75ca8ecb177 54d241973e', }, / encrypted plaintext / h'35aa3d98739289b83751125abe44e3b977e4b9abbf2c8cfaade b15f7681eef76df88f096', ]) Figure 4: COSE_Encrypt0 Example for HPKE Tschofenig, et al. Expires 10 January 2025 [Page 12] Internet-Draft COSE HPKE July 2024 5.2. HPKE Key Encryption Mode In this example we assume that a sender wants to transmit a payload to two recipients using the HPKE Key Encryption mode. Note that it is possible to send two single-layer payloads, although it will be less efficient. 5.2.1. COSE_Encrypt An example of the COSE_Encrypt structure using the HPKE scheme is shown in Figure 5. Line breaks and comments have been inserted for better readability. This example uses the following: TODO: recompute this for Recipient_structure * Encryption alg: AES-128-GCM * plaintext: "This is the content." * detatched ciphertext: h'cc168c4e148c52a83010a75250935a47ccb8682dee bcef8fce5d60c161e849f53a2dc664' * kid:"01" - alg: HPKE-Base-P256-SHA256-A128GCM - external_aad: "COSE-HPKE app" - skR: h'57c92077664146e876760c9520d054aa93c3afb04e306705db609030 8507b4d3' - skE: h'97ad883f949f4cdcb1301b9446950efd4eb519e16c4a3d78304eec83 2692f9f6' * kid:"02" - alg: HPKE-Base-X25519-SHA256-CHACHA20POLY1305 - external_aad: "COSE-HPKE app" - skR: h'bec275a17e4d362d0819dc0695d89a73be6bf94b66ab726ae0b1afe3 c43f41ce' - skE: h'b8ed3f4df56c230e36fa6620a47f24d08856d242ea547c5521ff7bd6 9af8fd6f' Tschofenig, et al. Expires 10 January 2025 [Page 13] Internet-Draft COSE HPKE July 2024 96_0([ / alg = AES-128-GCM (1) / h'a10101', { / iv / 5: h'b3fb95dde18c6f90a9f0ae55', }, / detached ciphertext / null, [ [ / alg = HPKE-Base-P256-SHA256-A128GCM (Assumed: 35) / h'a1011823', { / kid / 4: h'3031', / ek / -4: h'04d97b79486fe2e7b98fb1bd43 c4faee316ff38d28609a1cf568 40a809298a91e601f1cc0c2ba4 6cb67b41f4651b769cafd9df78 e58aa7f5771291bd4f0f420ba6', }, / ciphertext containing encrypted CEK / h'24450f54ae93375351467d17aa7a795cfede2 c03eced1ad21fcb7e7c2fe64397', ], [ / alg = HPKE-Base-X25519-SHA256-CHACHA20POLY1305 (Assumed: 42) / h'a101182a', { / kid / 4: h'3032', / ek / -4: h'd1afbdc95b0e735676f6bca34f be50f2822259ac09bfc3c500f1 4a05de9b2833', }, / ciphertext containing encrypted CEK / h'079b443ec6dfcda6a5f8748aff3875146a8ed 40359e1279b545166385d8d9b59', ], ], ]) Figure 5: COSE_Encrypt Example for HPKE Tschofenig, et al. Expires 10 January 2025 [Page 14] Internet-Draft COSE HPKE July 2024 To offer authentication of the sender the payload in Figure 5 is signed with a COSE_Sign1 wrapper, which is outlined in Figure 6. The payload in Figure 6 is meant to contain the content of Figure 5. 18( [ / protected / h'a10126' / { \ alg \ 1:-7 \ ECDSA 256 \ } / , / unprotected / { / kid / 4:'sender@example.com' }, / payload / h'AA19...B80C', / signature / h'E3B8...25B8' ] ) Figure 6: COSE_Encrypt Example for HPKE 5.2.2. COSE_MAC An example of the COSE_MAC structure using the HPKE scheme is shown in Figure 7. This example uses the following: * MAC alg: HMAC 256/256 * payload: "This is the content." * kid:"01" - alg: HPKE-Base-P256-SHA256-A128GCM - external_aad: "COSE-HPKE app" - skR: h'57c92077664146e876760c9520d054aa93c3afb04e306705db609030 8507b4d3' - skE: h'e5dd9472b5807636c95be0ba2575020ba91cbb3561b52be141da8967 8c664307' * kid:"02" - alg: HPKE-Base-X25519-SHA256-CHACHA20POLY1305 - external_aad: "COSE-HPKE app" Tschofenig, et al. Expires 10 January 2025 [Page 15] Internet-Draft COSE HPKE July 2024 - skR: h'bec275a17e4d362d0819dc0695d89a73be6bf94b66ab726ae0b1afe3 c43f41ce' - skE: h'78a49d7af71b5244498e943f361aa0250184afc48b8098a68ae97ccd 2cd7e56f' Tschofenig, et al. Expires 10 January 2025 [Page 16] Internet-Draft COSE HPKE July 2024 97_0([ / alg = HMAC 256/256 (5) / h'a10105', {}, / payload = 'This is the content.' / h'546869732069732074686520636f6e74656e742e', / tag / h'5cdcf6055fcbdb53b4001d8fb88b2a46b200ed28e1ed77e16ddf43fb3cac3a98', [ [ / alg = HPKE-Base-P256-SHA256-A128GCM (Assumed: 35) / h'a1011823', { / kid = '01' / 4: h'3031', / ek / -4: h'043ac21632e45e1fbd733f002a 621aa4f3d94737adc395d5a7cb 6e9554bd1ad273aec991493786 d72616d9759bf8526e6e20c1ed c41ba5739f2b2e441781aa0eb4', }, / ciphertext containing encrypted MAC key / h'5cee2b4235a7ff695164f7a8d1e79ccf3ca3d e8b22f3592626020a95b2a8d3fb4d7aa7fe37 432426ee70073a368f29d1', ], [ / alg = HPKE-Base-X25519-SHA256-CHACHA20POLY1305 (Assumed: 42) / h'a101182a', { / kid = '02' / 4: h'3032', / ek / -4: h'02cffacc60def3bb3d0a1c3661 227c9de8dc2b1d3939dd2c07d4 49ebb0bba324', }, / ciphertext containing encrypted MAC key / h'3f5b8b60271d5234dbea554dc1461d0239e9f 4589f6415e8563b061dbcb37795a616111b78 2b4c589b534309327ffadc', ], ], ]) Figure 7: COSE_MAC Example for HPKE Tschofenig, et al. Expires 10 January 2025 [Page 17] Internet-Draft COSE HPKE July 2024 5.3. Key Representation Examples of private and public KEM key representation are shown below. 5.3.1. KEM Public Key for HPKE-Base-P256-SHA256-A128GCM { / kty = 'EC2' / 1: 2, / kid = '01' / 2: h'3031', / alg = HPKE-Base-P256-SHA256-A128GCM (Assumed: 35) / 3: 35, / crv = 'P-256' / -1: 1, / x / -2: h'65eda5a12577c2bae829437fe338701a10aaa375e1bb5b5de108de439c08551d', / y / -3: h'1e52ed75701163f7f9e40ddf9f341b3dc9ba860af7e0ca7ca7e9eecd0084d19c' } Figure 8: Key Representation Example for HPKE-Base- P256-SHA256-A128GCM 5.3.2. KEM Private Key for HPKE-Base-P256-SHA256-A128GCM { / kty = 'EC2' / 1: 2, / kid = '01' / 2: h'3031', / alg = HPKE-Base-P256-SHA256-A128GCM (Assumed: 35) / 3: 35, / key_ops = ['derive_bits'] / 4: [8], / crv = 'P-256' / -1: 1, / x / -2: h'bac5b11cad8f99f9c72b05cf4b9e26d244dc189f745228255a219a86d6a09eff', / y / -3: h'20138bf82dc1b6d562be0fa54ab7804a3a64b6d72ccfed6b6fb6ed28bbfc117e', / d / -4: h'57c92077664146e876760c9520d054aa93c3afb04e306705db6090308507b4d3', } Figure 9: Key Representation Example for HPKE-Base- P256-SHA256-A128GCM Tschofenig, et al. Expires 10 January 2025 [Page 18] Internet-Draft COSE HPKE July 2024 5.3.3. KEM Public Key for HPKE-Base-X25519-SHA256-CHACHA20POLY1305 { / kty = 'OKP' / 1: 1, / kid = '11' / 2: h'3131', / alg = HPKE-Base-X25519-SHA256-CHACHA20POLY1305 (Assumed: 42) / 3: 42, / crv = 'X25519' / -1: 4, / x / -2: h'cb7c09ab7b973c77a808ee05b9bbd373b55c06eaa9bd4ad2bd4e9931b1c34c22', } Figure 10: Key Representation Example for HPKE-Base- X25519-SHA256-CHACHA20POLY1305 6. Security Considerations This specification is based on HPKE and the security considerations of [RFC9180] are therefore applicable also to this specification. HPKE assumes the sender is in possession of the public key of the recipient and HPKE COSE makes the same assumptions. Hence, some form of public key distribution mechanism is assumed to exist but outside the scope of this document. HPKE relies on a source of randomness to be available on the device. Additionally, with the two layer structure the CEK is randomly generated and it MUST be ensured that the guidelines in [RFC8937] for random number generations are followed. HPKE in Base mode does not offer authentication as part of the HPKE KEM. In this case COSE constructs like COSE_Sign, COSE_Sign1, COSE_MAC, or COSE_MAC0 can be used to add authentication. HPKE also offers modes that offer authentication. If COSE_Encrypt or COSE_Encrypt0 is used with a detached ciphertext then the subsequently applied integrity protection via COSE_Sign, COSE_Sign1, COSE_MAC, or COSE_MAC0 does not cover this detached ciphertext. Implementers MUST ensure that the detached ciphertext also experiences integrity protection. This is, for example, the case when an AEAD cipher is used to produce the detached ciphertext but may not be guaranteed by non-AEAD ciphers. Tschofenig, et al. Expires 10 January 2025 [Page 19] Internet-Draft COSE HPKE July 2024 7. IANA Considerations This document requests IANA to add new values to the 'COSE Algorithms' and to the 'COSE Header Parameters' registries. 7.1. COSE Algorithms Registry * Name: HPKE-Base-P256-SHA256-A128GCM * Value: TBD1 (Assumed: 35) * Description: Cipher suite for COSE-HPKE in Base Mode that uses the DHKEM(P-256, HKDF-SHA256) KEM, the HKDF-SHA256 KDF and the AES- 128-GCM AEAD. * Capabilities: [kty] * Change Controller: IESG * Reference: [[TBD: This RFC]] * Recommended: Yes * Name: HPKE-Base-P384-SHA384-AS256GCM * Value: TBD3 (Assumed: 37) * Description: Cipher suite for COSE-HPKE in Base Mode that uses the DHKEM(P-384, HKDF-SHA384) KEM, the HKDF-SHA384 KDF, and the AES- 256-GCM AEAD. * Capabilities: [kty] * Change Controller: IESG * Reference: [[TBD: This RFC]] * Recommended: Yes * Name: HPKE-Base-P521-SHA512-AS256GCM * Value: TBD5 (Assumed: 39) * Description: Cipher suite for COSE-HPKE in Base Mode that uses the DHKEM(P-521, HKDF-SHA512) KEM, the HKDF-SHA512 KDF, and the AES- 256-GCM AEAD. * Capabilities: [kty] Tschofenig, et al. Expires 10 January 2025 [Page 20] Internet-Draft COSE HPKE July 2024 * Change Controller: IESG * Reference: [[TBD: This RFC]] * Recommended: Yes * Name: HPKE-Base-X25519-SHA256-A128GCM * Value: TBD7 (Assumed: 41) * Description: Cipher suite for COSE-HPKE in Base Mode that uses the DHKEM(X25519, HKDF-SHA256) KEM, the HKDF-SHA256 KDF, and the AES- 128-GCM AEAD. * Capabilities: [kty] * Change Controller: IESG * Reference: [[TBD: This RFC]] * Recommended: Yes * Name: HPKE-Base-X25519-SHA256-ChaCha20Poly1305 * Value: TBD8 (Assumed: 42) * Description: Cipher suite for COSE-HPKE in Base Mode that uses the DHKEM(X25519, HKDF-SHA256) KEM, the HKDF-SHA256 KDF, and the ChaCha20Poly1305 AEAD. * Capabilities: [kty] * Change Controller: IESG * Reference: [[TBD: This RFC]] * Recommended: Yes * Name: HPKE-Base-X448-SHA512-AS256GCM * Value: TBD9 (Assumed: 43) * Description: Cipher suite for COSE-HPKE in Base Mode that uses the DHKEM(X448, HKDF-SHA512) KEM, the HKDF-SHA512 KDF, and the AES- 256-GCM AEAD. * Capabilities: [kty] Tschofenig, et al. Expires 10 January 2025 [Page 21] Internet-Draft COSE HPKE July 2024 * Change Controller: IESG * Reference: [[TBD: This RFC]] * Recommended: Yes * Name: HPKE-Base-X448-SHA512-ChaCha20Poly1305 * Value: TBD10 (Assumed: 44) * Description: Cipher suite for COSE-HPKE in Base Mode that uses the DHKEM(X448, HKDF-SHA512) KEM, the HKDF-SHA512 KDF, and the ChaCha20Poly1305 AEAD. * Capabilities: [kty] * Change Controller: IESG * Reference: [[TBD: This RFC]] * Recommended: Yes 7.2. COSE Header Parameters * Name: ek * Label: TBDX (Assumed: -4) * Value type: bstr * Value Registry: N/A * Description: HPKE encapsulated key * Reference: [[This specification]] 8. References 8.1. Normative References [RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997, . [RFC8174] Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC 2119 Key Words", BCP 14, RFC 8174, DOI 10.17487/RFC8174, May 2017, . Tschofenig, et al. Expires 10 January 2025 [Page 22] Internet-Draft COSE HPKE July 2024 [RFC9052] Schaad, J., "CBOR Object Signing and Encryption (COSE): Structures and Process", STD 96, RFC 9052, DOI 10.17487/RFC9052, August 2022, . [RFC9053] Schaad, J., "CBOR Object Signing and Encryption (COSE): Initial Algorithms", RFC 9053, DOI 10.17487/RFC9053, August 2022, . [RFC9180] Barnes, R., Bhargavan, K., Lipp, B., and C. Wood, "Hybrid Public Key Encryption", RFC 9180, DOI 10.17487/RFC9180, February 2022, . [STD94] Internet Standard 94, . At the time of writing, this STD comprises the following: Bormann, C. and P. Hoffman, "Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)", STD 94, RFC 8949, DOI 10.17487/RFC8949, December 2020, . 8.2. Informative References [HPKE-IANA] IANA, "Hybrid Public Key Encryption (HPKE) IANA Registry", October 2023, . [I-D.irtf-cfrg-dnhpke] Harkins, D., "Deterministic Nonce-less Hybrid Public Key Encryption", Work in Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-irtf- cfrg-dnhpke-04, 5 February 2024, . [RFC2630] Housley, R., "Cryptographic Message Syntax", RFC 2630, DOI 10.17487/RFC2630, June 1999, . [RFC8937] Cremers, C., Garratt, L., Smyshlyaev, S., Sullivan, N., and C. Wood, "Randomness Improvements for Security Protocols", RFC 8937, DOI 10.17487/RFC8937, October 2020, . Tschofenig, et al. Expires 10 January 2025 [Page 23] Internet-Draft COSE HPKE July 2024 Appendix A. Contributors We would like thank the following individuals for their contributions to the design of embedding the HPKE output into the COSE structure following a long and lively mailing list discussion: * Richard Barnes * Ilari Liusvaara Finally, we would like to thank Russ Housley and Brendan Moran for their contributions to the draft as co-authors of initial versions. Appendix B. Acknowledgements We would like to thank John Mattsson, Mike Prorock, Michael Richardson, and Goeran Selander for their review feedback. Authors' Addresses Hannes Tschofenig University of Applied Sciences Bonn-Rhein-Sieg Germany Email: hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net Orie Steele (editor) Transmute United States Email: orie@transmute.industries Daisuke Ajitomi bibital Japan Email: dajiaji@gmail.com Laurence Lundblade Security Theory LLC United States Email: lgl@securitytheory.com Tschofenig, et al. Expires 10 January 2025 [Page 24]