<?xml version="1.0" encoding="US-ASCII"?>
<!DOCTYPE rfc SYSTEM "rfc2629.dtd">
<?rfc toc="yes"?>
<?rfc compact="yes"?>
<?rfc subcompact="no"?>
<?rfc sortrefs="yes"?>
<?rfc symrefs="yes"?>
<?rfc tocdepth="6"?>
<?rfc rfcedstyle="yes"?>

<rfc category="std" ipr="trust200902" submissionType="IETF" obsoletes="6146" docName="draft-ietf-v6ops-rfc6146-bis-01">
 <front>
   <title abbrev="Stateful NAT64">Stateful NAT64: Network Address and Protocol
   Translation from&nbsp;IPv6&nbsp;Clients&nbsp;to&nbsp;IPv4 Servers</title>


   <author fullname="Marcelo Bagnulo" initials="M." surname="Bagnulo">
     <organization>UC3M</organization>

     <address>
       <postal>
         <street>Av. Universidad 30</street>

         <city>Leganes</city>

         <region>Madrid</region>

         <code>28911</code>

         <country>Spain</country>
       </postal>

       <phone>+34-91-6249500</phone>

       <email>marcelo@it.uc3m.es</email>

       <uri>http://www.it.uc3m.es/marcelo</uri>
     </address>
   </author>
   
   <author fullname="Philip Matthews" initials="P." surname="Matthews">
     
     <address>
       <postal>
         <street>600 March Road</street>

         <city>Ottawa</city>

         <region>Ontario</region>

         <code></code>

         <country>Canada</country>
       </postal>

       <email>philip_matthews@magma.ca</email>

     </address>
   </author>
   
   <author fullname="Jordi Palet Martinez" initials="J" surname="Palet Martinez" role="editor">
     <organization>The IPv6 Company</organization>

     <address>
       <postal>
         <street>Molino de la Navata, 75</street>

         <city>La Navata - Galapagar</city>

         <region>Madrid</region>

         <code>28420</code>

         <country>Spain</country>
       </postal>

       <email>jordi.palet@theipv6company.com</email>

       <uri>http://www.theipv6company.com/</uri>
     </address>
   </author>


   <date year="2026" />

   <area>Ops</area>

   <workgroup>v6ops</workgroup>

   <keyword>NAT64</keyword>

   <keyword>IPv6</keyword>

   <abstract>
	   <t>This document describes stateful NAT64 translation, which allows IPv6-only clients to contact IPv4 servers using unicast UDP, TCP, or ICMP. One or more public IPv4 addresses assigned to a NAT64 translator are shared among several IPv6-only clients. When stateful NAT64 is used in conjunction with DNS64, no changes are required in the IPv6 client neither the IPv4 server.</t>
       
       <t>At the time of writing this document, Stateful NAT64 has been widely and succesfully deployed across many networks in Internet.</t>
   </abstract>

 </front>

 <middle>
   <section title="Introduction">
     <t>This document specifies stateful NAT64, a mechanism for IPv4-IPv6 transition and IPv4-IPv6 coexistence. Together with DNS64 <xref target="RFC6147"></xref>, these two mechanisms allow an IPv6-only client to initiate communications to an IPv4-only server. They also enable peer-to-peer communication between an IPv4 and an IPv6 node, where the communication can be initiated when either end uses existing, NAT-traversal, peer-to-peer communication techniques, such as Interactive Connectivity Establishment (ICE) <xref target="RFC5245"></xref>. Stateful NAT64 also supports IPv4-initiated communications to a subset of the IPv6 hosts through statically configured bindings in the stateful NAT64.</t>

     <t>Stateful NAT64 is a mechanism for translating IPv6 packets to IPv4 packets and vice versa. The translation is done by translating the packet headers according to the IP/ICMP Translation Algorithm defined in <xref target="RFC7915"></xref>. The IPv4 addresses of IPv4 hosts are algorithmically translated to and from IPv6 addresses by using the algorithm defined in <xref target="RFC6052"></xref> and an IPv6 prefix assigned to the stateful NAT64 for this specific purpose. The IPv6 addresses of IPv6 hosts are translated to and from IPv4 addresses by installing mappings in the normal Network Address Port Translation (NAPT) manner <xref target="RFC3022"></xref>. This specification only defines how stateful NAT64 translates unicast packets carrying TCP, UDP, and ICMP traffic. Multicast packets and other protocols, including the Stream Control Transmission Protocol (SCTP), the Datagram Congestion Control Protocol (DCCP), and IPsec, are out of the scope of this specification.</t>

     <t>DNS64 is a mechanism for synthesizing AAAA resource records (RRs) from A RRs. The IPv6 address contained in the synthetic AAAA RR is algorithmically generated from the IPv4 address and the IPv6 prefix assigned to a NAT64 device by using the same algorithm defined in <xref target="RFC6052"></xref>.</t>

     <t>Together, these two mechanisms allow an IPv6-only client (i.e., a host with a networking stack that only implements IPv6, a host with a networking stack that implements both protocols but with only IPv6 connectivity, or a host running an IPv6-only application) to initiate communications to an IPv4-only server (which is analogous to the IPv6-only host above).</t>

     <t>These mechanisms play a critical role in IPv4-IPv6 transition and IPv4-IPv6 coexistence. Due to IPv4 address depletion, more new clients are IPv6-only and they may still need to connect to the existing IPv4-only servers. The stateful NAT64 and DNS64 mechanisms are easily deployable, since they do not require changes to either the IPv6 client or the IPv4 server. For basic functionality, the approach only requires the deployment of the stateful NAT64 function somwhere in the path between the devices connecting an IPv6-only network to the IPv4-only network, along with the deployment of a DNS64-enabled name servers accessible to the IPv6-only hosts. An analysis of the application scenarios can be found in <xref target="RFC6144"></xref>.</t>

	<t>For brevity, in the rest of the document, we will refer to the stateful NAT64 either as stateful NAT64 or simply as NAT64.</t>

    <t>It has to be remarked, that since the original NAT64 specification was published, it has been widely deployed across many networks, with great success.</t>

	<section title="Features of Stateful NAT64">
	  <t>The features of NAT64 are:<list style="symbols">
	      
	      <t> NAT64 is compliant with the
		recommendations for how NATs should handle UDP <xref
		target="RFC4787"></xref>, TCP <xref target="RFC5382"></xref>, and ICMP 
		<xref target="RFC5508"></xref>. As such, NAT64 only supports Endpoint-Independent Mappings
		and supports both Endpoint-Independent and Address-Dependent Filtering. 
		Because of the compliance with the aforementioned requirements, NAT64 is compatible 
		with current NAT traversal techniques, such as ICE <xref target="RFC5245"></xref>,
		and with other NAT traversal techniques.</t>
	
		  <t>In the absence of preexisting state in a NAT64, only IPv6 nodes can initiate sessions to IPv4 nodes.
		     This works for roughly the same class of applications that work
	         through IPv4-to-IPv4 NATs.</t>
		  <t>Depending on the filtering policy used (Endpoint-Independent,
		   or Address-Dependent), IPv4-nodes might be able
		   to initiate sessions to a given IPv6 node, if the NAT64 somehow has an
		   appropriate mapping (i.e., state) for an IPv6 node, via one of the
		   following mechanisms:
				<list>
		          <t> The IPv6 node has recently initiated a session to the
					same or another IPv4 node. This is also the case if the IPv6 
					node has used a NAT-traversal technique (such as ICE).</t>
		          <t> A statically configured mapping exists
					for the IPv6 node.</t>
             </list></t>
			<t>IPv4 address sharing: NAT64 allows multiple IPv6-only nodes to share an IPv4 address
		    to access the IPv4 Internet. This helps with the
forthcoming IPv4 exhaustion.</t>

		    <t>As currently defined in this NAT64 specification, only TCP, UDP, and ICMP are supported. Support for other protocols (such as other transport protocols and IPsec) may be defined in separate documents.</t>
         </list></t>
     </section>


   <section title="Overview">
     <t>This section provides a non-normative introduction to
      NAT64.	This is achieved by describing the NAT64 behavior involving a simple 
	setup that involves a single NAT64 device, a single DNS64, and a simple
	network topology. The goal of this description is to provide the reader with 
	a general view of NAT64.  It is not the goal of this
	section to describe all possible configurations nor to provide a normative 
	specification of the NAT64 behavior.
	So, for the sake of clarity, only TCP and UDP are described in this overview; the details
    of ICMP, fragmentation, and other aspects of translation are purposefully avoided in this overview.
    The normative specification of NAT64 is provided in <xref target="normative"/>.</t>

     <t>The NAT64 mechanism is implemented in a device that has (at least) two
     interfaces, an IPv4 interface connected to the IPv4 network, and an
     IPv6 interface connected to the IPv6 network. Packets generated in the
     IPv6 network for a receiver located in the IPv4 network will be routed
     within the IPv6 network towards the NAT64 device. The NAT64 will
     translate them and forward them as IPv4 packets through the IPv4 network
     to the IPv4 receiver. The reverse takes place for packets generated by hosts connected to 
     the IPv4 network for an IPv6 receiver. NAT64, however, is not symmetric.
     In order to be able to perform IPv6-IPv4 translation, NAT64
     requires state. The state contains the
	  binding of an IPv6 address and TCP/UDP port (hereafter called an IPv6 transport address) 
	  to an IPv4 address and TCP/UDP port (hereafter called an IPv4 transport address).</t>

     <t>Such binding state is either statically configured in the NAT64 or it is 
	 created when the first packet flowing from the
     IPv6 network to the IPv4 network is translated. After the binding state
     has been created, 
	 packets flowing in both directions on that particular
     flow are translated. The result is that, in the general case, NAT64 only supports
     communications initiated by the IPv6-only node towards an IPv4-only
     node. Some additional mechanisms (like ICE) or static binding
configuration can be used 
	 to provide support for communications initiated by an
     IPv4-only node to an IPv6-only node. </t>

     <section title="Stateful NAT64 Solution Elements">
       <t>In this section, we describe the different elements involved in the
       NAT64 approach.</t>

       <t>The main component of the proposed solution is the translator
       itself. The translator has essentially two main parts, the address
       translation mechanism and the protocol translation mechanism.</t>

       <t>Protocol translation from an IPv4 packet header to an IPv6 packet header
       and vice versa is performed according to the <xref
       target="RFC7915">IP/ICMP Translation Algorithm</xref>.</t>

       <t>Address translation maps IPv6 transport addresses to IPv4 transport
       addresses and vice versa. In order to create these mappings, the NAT64
       has two pools of addresses: an IPv6 address pool (to represent
       IPv4 addresses in the IPv6 network) and an IPv4 address pool (to
       represent IPv6 addresses in the IPv4 network). </t>

       <t>The IPv6 address pool is one or more IPv6 prefixes assigned to the translator 
	   itself. Hereafter, we will call the IPv6 address pool Pref64::/n; in the case there is more 
	   than one prefix assigned to the NAT64, the comments made about Pref64::/n apply to each of them. 
	   Pref64::/n will be used by the NAT64 to construct IPv4-Converted IPv6 addresses as defined in <xref target="RFC6052"></xref>.
	   Due to the abundance of IPv6 address space, 
	   it is possible to assign one or more Pref64::/n, each of them being equal to or even bigger than the size of the whole IPv4 address space. This allows
       each IPv4 address to be mapped into a different IPv6 address by simply
       concatenating a Pref64::/n with the IPv4 address being mapped and a suffix. 
	   The provisioning of the Pref64::/n as well as the address format are 
 	   defined in <xref target="RFC6052" />. </t>

       <t>The IPv4 address pool is a set of IPv4 addresses,
       normally a prefix assigned by the local administrator. Since IPv4 
		address space is a scarce resource, the IPv4 address pool is small and 
		typically not sufficient to establish permanent one-to-one mappings with IPv6
       addresses. So, except for the static/manually created ones, 
	   mappings using the IPv4 address pool will be created
       and released dynamically. Moreover, because of the IPv4 address
       scarcity, the usual practice for NAT64 is likely to be the binding of
       IPv6 transport addresses into IPv4 transport addresses, instead of
       IPv6 addresses into IPv4 addresses directly, enabling a higher
       utilization of the limited IPv4 address pool. This implies that NAT64 performs both address and port translation.</t>

       <t>
   Because of the dynamic nature of the IPv6-to-IPv4 address mapping and
   the static nature of the IPv4-to-IPv6 address mapping, it is far
   simpler to allow communications initiated from the IPv6 side toward
   an IPv4 node, whose address is algorithmically mapped into an IPv6
   address, than communications initiated from IPv4-only nodes to an
   IPv6 node.  In that case, an IPv4 address needs to be associated with
   the IPv6 node's address dynamically.
</t>

       <t>Using a mechanism such as DNS64, an IPv6 client obtains an IPv6 address that embeds
	  the IPv4 address of the IPv4 server and sends a packet to that
	  IPv6 address. The
       packets are intercepted by the NAT64 device, which associates an IPv4 transport
       address out of its IPv4 pool to the IPv6 transport address of the
       initiator, creating binding state, so that reply packets can be
       translated and forwarded back to the initiator. The binding state is
       kept while packets are flowing. Once the flow stops, and based on a
       timer, the IPv4 transport address is returned to the IPv4 address pool
       so that it can be reused for other communications.</t>

       <t>To allow an IPv6 initiator to do a DNS lookup to learn
       the address of the responder, DNS64 <xref target="RFC6147"></xref> 
		is used to synthesize AAAA RRs from the A
       RRs. The IPv6 addresses contained in the synthetic AAAA RRs contain 
       a Pref64::/n assigned to the NAT64 and the IPv4 
	   address of the responder. The
       synthetic AAAA RRs are passed back to the IPv6 initiator, which will
       initiate an IPv6 communication with an IPv6 address associated to the
       IPv4 receiver. The packet will be routed to the NAT64 device, which
       will create the IPv6-to-IPv4 address mapping as described before.</t>

     </section>

     <section title="Stateful NAT64 Behavior Walk-Through">
       <t>In this section, we provide a simple example of the NAT64 behavior. 
	   We consider an IPv6 node that is located in an IPv6-only
       site and that initiates a TCP connection to an IPv4-only node located in the IPv4
       network.</t>

       <t>The scenario for this case is depicted in the following figure:</t>

       <figure>
         <artwork align="center">
+---------------------+         +---------------+
|IPv6 network         |         |    IPv4       |
|           |  +-------------+  |  network      |
|           |--| Name server |--|               |
|           |  | with DNS64  |  |  +----+       |
|  +----+   |  +-------------+  |  | H2 |       |
|  | H1 |---|         |         |  +----+       |
|  +----+   |      +-------+    |  192.0.2.1    |
|2001:db8::1|------| NAT64 |----|               |
|           |      +-------+    |               |
|           |         |         |               |
+---------------------+         +---------------+
	</artwork>

         <postamble></postamble>
       </figure>

       <t>The figure above shows an IPv6 node H1 with an IPv6 address 2001:db8::1 and an
       IPv4 node H2 with IPv4 address 192.0.2.1.  H2 has h2.example.com as its
Fully Qualified Domain Name (FQDN).</t>

       <t>A NAT64 connects the IPv6 network to the IPv4 network. This NAT64 uses the Well-Known Prefix 64:ff9b::/96
	     defined in <xref target="RFC6052"></xref> to represent IPv4 addresses in
		the IPv6 address space and a single IPv4 address 203.0.113.1 assigned to its IPv4 interface.
		The routing is configured in such a way that the IPv6 packets addressed
		to a destination address in 64:ff9b::/96  are routed to the IPv6
		interface of the NAT64 device. </t>

       <t>Also shown is a local name server with DNS64 functionality. The local 
		name server uses the Well-Known Prefix 64:ff9b::/96 to create the IPv6 addresses in the synthetic RRs.</t>

       <t>For this example, assume the typical DNS situation where IPv6 hosts
       have only stub resolvers, and the local name server does the recursive
       lookups.</t>

       <t>The steps by which H1 establishes communication with H2 are: <list
           style="numbers">
           <t>H1 performs a DNS query for h2.example.com and receives the synthetic
	 			AAAA RR from the local name server that implements the 
	    		DNS64 functionality. The AAAA record contains an IPv6 address formed 
	 			by the Well-Known Prefix and
               the IPv4 address of H2 (i.e., 64:ff9b::192.0.2.1).</t>


           <t>H1 sends a TCP SYN packet
           to H2. The packet is sent from a source transport address of
           (2001:db8::1,1500) to a destination transport address of (64:ff9b::192.0.2.1,80), where 
           the ports are set by H1.</t>

           <t>The packet is routed to the IPv6 interface of the NAT64 (since
            IPv6 routing is configured that way).</t>

           <t>The NAT64 receives the packet and performs the following
           actions: <list style="symbols">
               <t>The NAT64 selects an unused port (e.g., 2000) on its IPv4 address 203.0.113.1
               and creates the mapping entry (2001:db8::1,1500) &lt;--&gt; (203.0.113.1,2000)</t>

               <t>The NAT64 translates the IPv6 header into an IPv4 header
               using the IP/ICMP Translation Algorithm <xref target="RFC7915"></xref>.</t>

               <t>The NAT64 includes (203.0.113.1,2000) as the source transport address in the
               packet and (192.0.2.1,80) as the destination transport address in the
               packet. Note that 192.0.2.1 is extracted directly from the destination 
			   IPv6 address of the received IPv6
               packet that is being translated. The destination port 80 of the translated
 				packet is the same as the destination port of the received IPv6 packet.</t>
             </list></t>
			
			<t>The NAT64 sends the translated packet out of its IPv4
           interface and the packet arrives at H2.</t>

           <t>H2 node responds by sending a TCP SYN+ACK packet with the destination transport
           address (203.0.113.1,2000) and source transport address (192.0.2.1,80).</t>

           <t>Since the IPv4 address 203.0.113.1 is assigned to the IPv4 interface of the NAT64 device, 
			the packet is routed to the NAT64 device, which will look for an
           existing mapping containing (203.0.113.1,2000). Since the mapping (2001:db8::1,1500)
           &lt;--&gt; (203.0.113.1,2000) exists, the NAT64 performs the following
           operations: <list style="symbols">
               <t>The NAT64 translates the IPv4 header into an IPv6 header
               using the IP/ICMP Translation Algorithm <xref target="RFC7915"></xref>.</t>

               <t>The NAT64 includes (2001:db8::1,1500) as the destination transport address in
               the packet and (64:ff9b::192.0.2.1,80) as the source transport address
               in the packet. Note that 192.0.2.1 is extracted directly from the
               source IPv4 address of the received IPv4 packet that is being
               translated. The source port 80 of the translated
 				packet is the same as the source port of the received IPv4 packet.</t>
             </list></t>

			<t>The translated packet is sent out of the IPv6 interface to
           H1.</t>

         </list></t>

	  <t>The packet exchange between H1 and H2 continues, and packets are
       translated in the different directions as previously
       described.</t>

       <t>It is important to note that the translation still works if the 
			IPv6 initiator H1 learns the IPv6 representation of H2's IPv4 
			address (i.e., 64:ff9b::192.0.2.1) through some scheme other than a DNS lookup. 
			This is because the DNS64 processing does NOT
       result in any state being installed in the NAT64 and because the mapping
       of the IPv4 address into an IPv6 address is the result of
       concatenating the Well-Known Prefix to the original IPv4
       address.</t>
     </section>

     <section title="Filtering">
       <t>NAT64 may do filtering, which means that it only allows a
       packet in through an interface under certain circumstances.
	   The NAT64 can filter IPv6 packets based on the administrative 
	   rules to create entries in the binding and session tables. The filtering can be flexible 
	   and general, but the idea of the filtering is to provide the 
	   administrators necessary control to avoid denial-of-service (DoS) attacks that would result in 
	   exhaustion of the NAT64's IPv4 address, port, memory, and CPU resources. Filtering techniques of 
	   incoming IPv6 packets are not specific to the NAT64 and therefore are not described in this specification.</t>

	   <t>Filtering of IPv4 packets, on the other hand, is tightly coupled to the NAT64 state and
		therefore is described in this specification. In this document, we consider that the
	       NAT64 may do no filtering, or it may filter incoming IPv4 packets.</t>

       <t>NAT64 filtering of incoming IPv4 packets is consistent with the recommendations of 
	    <xref target="RFC4787"></xref> and
		<xref target="RFC5382"></xref>. Because of that, the NAT64
		as specified in this document supports both Endpoint-Independent Filtering 
		and Address-Dependent Filtering, both for TCP and UDP as well as filtering of ICMP packets.</t>

		<t>If a NAT64 performs Endpoint-Independent Filtering of incoming IPv4 packets,
			then an incoming IPv4 packet is dropped unless the NAT64 has state for the 
			destination transport address of the incoming IPv4 packet.</t>

       <t>
		If a NAT64 performs Address-Dependent Filtering of incoming IPv4 packets, then an incoming IPv4 packet is dropped
		unless the NAT64 has state involving the destination transport address of the IPv4 incoming packet 
		and the particular source IP address of the incoming IPv4 packet.</t>


     </section>

   </section>
   </section>

   <section title="Terminology">
     <t>This section provides a definitive reference for all the terms used
     in this document. </t>

     <t>The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
     "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
     document are to be interpreted as described in <xref
     target="RFC2119">RFC 2119</xref>.</t>

     <t>The following additional terms are used in this document:</t>

     <t><list style="hanging">
		 <t hangText="3-Tuple:"> The tuple (source IP address, destination
		 IP address, ICMP Identifier). A 3-tuple uniquely identifies an
		 ICMP Query session. When an ICMP Query session flows through
	     a NAT64, each session has two different 3-tuples: one with IPv4
	     addresses and one with IPv6 addresses. </t>
		
         <t hangText="5-Tuple:">The tuple (source IP address, source port,
         destination IP address, destination port, transport protocol). A
         5-tuple uniquely identifies a UDP/TCP session. When a UDP/TCP session flows through
         a NAT64, each session has two different 5-tuples: one with IPv4
         addresses and one with IPv6 addresses. </t>

         <t hangText="BIB:">Binding Information Base. A table of bindings kept
         by a NAT64. 	Each NAT64 has a BIB for each translated protocol. An
			implementation compliant to this document would have a BIB
			for TCP, one for UDP, and one for ICMP Queries. Additional BIBs
			would be added to support other protocols, such as SCTP.</t>

         <t hangText="Endpoint-Independent Mapping:">In NAT64, using the same 
		  mapping for all the sessions involving a given IPv6 transport address 
		  of an IPv6 host (irrespectively of the transport address of the IPv4 
		  host involved in the communication). 
	  	  Endpoint-Independent Mapping is
         important for peer-to-peer communication. See <xref
         target="RFC4787"></xref> for the definition of the different types
         of mappings in IPv4-to-IPv4 NATs.</t>

         <t hangText="Filtering, Endpoint-Independent:"> The NAT64 only filters  
		 incoming IPv4 packets destined to a transport address for 
		 which there is no state in the NAT64, regardless of the source 
		 IPv4 transport address. The NAT forwards any packets destined to
         any transport address for which it has state.  
		 In other words, having state for a given transport address is sufficient 
		 to allow any packets back to the internal endpoint. See <xref
         target="RFC4787"></xref> for the definition of the different types
         of filtering in IPv4-to-IPv4 NATs.</t>

      	 <t hangText="Filtering, Address-Dependent:">
         The NAT64 filters incoming IPv4 packets destined to a transport 
		 address for which there is no state (similar to the Endpoint-Independent 
		 Filtering).  Additionally, the NAT64 will filter out incoming 
		 IPv4 packets coming from a given IPv4 address X and
         destined for a transport address for which it has state if the NAT64 has not
         sent packets to X previously (independently of the port
         used by X).
		 In other words, for receiving packets from a
         specific IPv4 endpoint, it is necessary for the IPv6
         endpoint to send packets first to that specific IPv4
         endpoint's IP address.</t>

         <t hangText="Hairpinning:">Having a packet do a "U-turn" inside a NAT
         and come back out the same side as it arrived on.
	     If the destination IPv6 address and its embedded IPv4 address 
	     are both assigned to the NAT64 itself, then the packet is 
	     being sent to another IPv6 host connected to the same
	     NAT64.  Such a packet is called a 'hairpin packet'.
         A NAT64 that forwards hairpin packets back to the IPv6 host is defined as
		 supporting "hairpinning". Hairpinning
         support is important for peer-to-peer applications, as there are
         cases when two different hosts on the same side of a NAT can only
         communicate using sessions that hairpin through the NAT. Hairpin packets can be either TCP or UDP. More detailed 
		 explanation of hairpinning and examples for the UDP case can be found in <xref
         target="RFC4787"></xref>.  </t>

		<t hangText="ICMP Query packet:">ICMP packets that are not ICMP error messages. For ICMPv6, ICMPv6
			Query Messages are the ICMPv6 Informational messages as defined in <xref target="RFC4443"></xref>.
			For ICMPv4, ICMPv4 Query messages are all ICMPv4 messages that are not ICMPv4 error messages.</t>

         <t hangText="Mapping or Binding:">A mapping between an IPv6 transport address and a
         IPv4 transport address or a mapping between an (IPv6 address, ICMPv6 Identifier)
 		 pair and an (IPv4 address, ICMPv4 Identifier) pair. Used to
translate the addresses and ports / ICMP Identifiers
         of packets flowing between the IPv6 host and the IPv4 host. 
	      In NAT64, the IPv4 address and port / ICMPv4 Identifier is always
         one assigned to the NAT64 itself, while the IPv6
         address and port / ICMPv6 Identifier belongs to some IPv6 host.</t>

         <t hangText="Session:">The
         flow of packets between two different
         hosts. This may be TCP, UDP, or ICMP Queries. In NAT64, typically one host is an IPv4 host, and the
         other one is an IPv6 host. However, due to hairpinning, both hosts might be IPv6 hosts.</t>

         <t hangText="Session table:">A table of sessions kept by a NAT64.
         Each NAT64 has three session tables, one for TCP, one for UDP, and one for ICMP Queries.</t>

         <t hangText="Stateful NAT64:">
		A function that has per-flow state that translates IPv6 packets
		  to IPv4 packets and vice versa, for TCP, UDP, and ICMP.  The NAT64 uses binding state to 
 		 perform the translation between IPv6 and IPv4 addresses. 
		 In this document, we also refer to stateful NAT64 simply as NAT64.</t>
		
         <t hangText="Stateful NAT64 device:">
		 The device where the NAT64 function is executed.
		 In this document, we also refer to stateful NAT64 device simply as NAT64 device.</t>
		
         <t hangText="Transport Address:">The combination of an IPv6 or IPv4
         address and a port. Typically written as (IP address,port), e.g.,
         (192.0.2.15,8001).</t>

		 <t hangText="Tuple:">Refers to either a 3-tuple or a 5-tuple as defined above.</t>

       </list></t>

     <t>For a detailed understanding of this document, the reader should also be
     familiar with 
     NAT terminology <xref target="RFC4787"></xref>.</t>
   </section>

   <section anchor="normative" title="Stateful NAT64 Normative Specification">

       <t>A NAT64 is a device with at least one IPv6 interface and at least one IPv4 interface.
       Each NAT64 device MUST have at least one unicast /n IPv6 prefix assigned to it,
       denoted Pref64::/n. Additional considerations about the Pref64::/n are presented in
 		<xref target="address-transform"></xref>. A NAT64 MUST have one or more unicast
       IPv4 addresses assigned to it. </t>

       <t>A NAT64 uses the following conceptual dynamic data structures:<list
           style="symbols">
           <t>UDP Binding Information Base</t>

           <t>UDP Session Table</t>

           <t>TCP Binding Information Base</t>

           <t>TCP Session Table</t>

			<t>ICMP Query Binding Information Base</t>
			
			<t>ICMP Query Session Table</t>
         </list></t>

		<t>These tables contain information needed for the NAT64 processing. The actual
			 division of the information into six tables is done in order to ease the 
			description of the NAT64 behavior. NAT64 implementations are free to use different data structures
			but they MUST store all the required information, and the externally
		       visible outcome MUST be the same as the one described in this document.</t> 

		<t>The notation used is the following: uppercase letters are IPv4
		addresses; uppercase letters with a prime(') are IPv6
addresses; lowercase letters are ports; IPv6 prefixes of length n are indicated
by "P::/n"; mappings
		       are indicated as "(X,x) &lt;--&gt; (Y',y)".</t>

	   <section title="Binding Information Bases">

       <t>A NAT64 has three Binding Information Bases (BIBs): one for TCP, one for
       UDP, and one for ICMP Queries. In the case of UDP and TCP BIBs, each
  	   BIB entry specifies a mapping between an IPv6 transport address
       and an IPv4 transport address:<list>
           <t>(X',x) &lt;--&gt; (T,t)</t>
         </list>where X' is some IPv6 address, T is an IPv4 address, and x and t
       are ports. T will always be one of the IPv4 addresses assigned to the NAT64.
	   The BIB has then two columns: the BIB IPv6 transport address and the BIB IPv4 transport address.
       A given IPv6 or IPv4 transport address can appear
       in at most one entry in a BIB: for example, (2001:db8::17, 49832) can
       appear in at most one TCP and at most one UDP BIB entry. TCP and UDP
       have separate BIBs because the port number space for TCP and UDP are
       distinct. If the BIBs are implemented as specified in this document, it results in Endpoint-Independent Mappings in the NAT64.
		The information in the BIBs is also used to implement Endpoint-Independent Filtering.
		(Address-Dependent Filtering is implemented using the session tables described below.)</t>

	   <t>In the case of the ICMP Query BIB, each ICMP Query BIB entry specifies a 
		mapping between an (IPv6 address, ICMPv6 Identifier)
	    pair and an (IPv4 address, ICMPv4 Identifier) pair.
		<list>
	      <t>(X',i1) &lt;--&gt; (T,i2)</t>
	         </list>
	    where X' is some IPv6 address, T is an IPv4 address, i1 is an ICMPv6 Identifier, and i2
	    is an ICMPv4 Identifier. T will always be one of the IPv4 addresses assigned to the NAT64.
	    A given (IPv6 or IPv4 address, ICMPv6 or ICMPv4 Identifier) pair can appear
	    in at most one entry in the ICMP Query BIB. </t>
	
	   <t>Entries in any of the three BIBs can be created dynamically as the result of the
		flow of packets as described in <xref target="sec-session-info"></xref>,
		but they can also be created manually by an administrator. NAT64
		implementations SHOULD support manually configured BIB entries for any of the three BIBs.
		Dynamically created entries are deleted from the corresponding BIB when the last session 
		associated with the BIB entry is removed from the session table. 
		Manually configured BIB entries are not deleted when there is no corresponding
		Session Table Entry and can only be deleted by the administrator.</t> 

       </section>
	   <section title="Session Tables">
       <t>A NAT64 also has three session tables: one for TCP sessions, one
       for UDP sessions, and one for ICMP Query sessions. Each entry keeps information on the state of the
       corresponding session. 
	   In the TCP and UDP session tables, each entry specifies a mapping between a pair of IPv6 transport addresses
       and a pair of IPv4 transport addresses:<list>
           <t>(X',x),(Y',y) &lt;--&gt; (T,t),(Z,z)</t>
         </list>where X' and Y' are IPv6 addresses, T and Z are IPv4 addresses, and x, y, z, and t
       are ports. T will always be one of the IPv4 addresses assigned to the NAT64.
	   Y' is always the IPv6 representation of the IPv4 address Z, so Y' is obtained
	   from Z using the algorithm applied by the NAT64 to create IPv6 representations of 
	   IPv4 addresses. y will always be equal to z. </t>
		<t>For each TCP or UDP Session Table Entry (STE), there are then five columns.
			The terminology used for the STE columns is from the perspective 
			of an incoming IPv6 packet being translated into an outgoing IPv4 packet.
			The columns are:
			<list>  
				<t>The STE source IPv6 transport address; (X',x) in the example above.</t>
				<t>The STE destination IPv6 transport address; (Y',y) in the example above.</t>
				<t>The STE source IPv4 transport address; (T,t) in the example above.</t>
				<t>The STE destination IPv4 transport address; (Z,z) in the example above.</t> 
				<t>The STE lifetime.</t>
			</list>
			</t>
       <t>In the ICMP Query session table, each entry specifies a mapping between a 3-tuple of IPv6 source address,
	   IPv6 destination address, and ICMPv6 Identifier and a 3-tuple of IPv4 source address,
		   IPv4 destination address, and ICMPv4 Identifier:<list>
           <t>(X',Y',i1) &lt;--&gt; (T,Z,i2)</t>
         </list>where X' and Y' are IPv6 addresses, T and Z are IPv4 addresses, i1 is an ICMPv6 Identifier, and i2
       is an ICMPv4 Identifier. T will always be one of the IPv4 addresses assigned to the NAT64.
	   Y' is always the IPv6 representation of the IPv4 address Z, so Y' is obtained
	   from Z using the algorithm applied by the NAT64 to create IPv6 representations of 
	   IPv4 addresses.</t>
		<t>For each ICMP Query Session Table Entry (STE), there are then seven columns:
			<list>  
				<t>The STE source IPv6 address; X' in the example above.</t>
				<t>The STE destination IPv6 address; Y' in the example above.</t>
				<t>The STE ICMPv6 Identifier; i1 in the example above.</t>
				<t>The STE source IPv4 address; T in the example above.</t>
				<t>The STE destination IPv4 address; Z in the example above.</t>
				<t>The STE ICMPv4 Identifier; i2 in the example above.</t> 
				<t>The STE lifetime.</t>
			</list></t>

	   </section>
	   <section title="Packet Processing Overview">

	   <t>The NAT64 uses the session state information to determine when the
       session is completed, and also uses session information for Address-Dependent
       Filtering. A session can be uniquely identified by either an incoming
       tuple or an outgoing tuple.</t>

       <t>For each TCP or UDP session, there is a corresponding BIB entry, uniquely
       specified by either the source IPv6 transport address 
       (in the IPv6 --&gt; IPv4 direction) or the destination IPv4 transport address (in the IPv4
       --&gt; IPv6 direction). For each ICMP Query session, there is a corresponding BIB entry, uniquely
       specified by either the source IPv6 address and ICMPv6 Identifier
       (in the IPv6 --&gt; IPv4 direction) or the 
	   destination IPv4 address and the ICMPv4 Identifier (in the IPv4
       --&gt; IPv6 direction). However, for all the BIBs, a single BIB entry can have multiple
       corresponding sessions. When the last corresponding session is
       deleted, if the BIB entry was dynamically created, the BIB entry is deleted.</t>

	   <t>The NAT64 will receive packets through its interfaces. These packets can be either IPv6
		packets or IPv4 packets, and they may carry TCP traffic, UDP traffic, or ICMP traffic. The processing 
		of the packets will be described next. In the case that the processing is common to all the aforementioned
		types of packets, we will refer to the packet as the incoming
IP packet in general. In the case that the processing
		is specific to IPv6 packets, we will explicitly refer to the
incoming packet as an incoming IPv6 packet; analogous terminology will apply in
the case of processing that is specific to IPv4 packets.</t>


       <t> The processing of an incoming 
		IP packet takes the following steps:<list style="numbers">
           <t>Determining the incoming tuple</t>

           <t>Filtering and updating binding and session information</t>

           <t>Computing the outgoing tuple</t>

           <t>Translating the packet</t>

           <t>Handling hairpinning</t>
         </list>The details of these steps are specified in the following
       subsections.</t>

       <t>This breakdown of the NAT64 behavior into processing steps is done
       for ease of presentation. A NAT64 MAY perform the steps in a different
       order or MAY perform different steps, but the externally
       visible outcome MUST be the same as the one described in this document.</t>

   </section>

       <section anchor="incoming tuple" title="Determining the Incoming Tuple">
         <t>This step associates an incoming tuple with every incoming IP packet 
			for use in subsequent steps. In the case of TCP, UDP, and ICMP error packets, the 
			tuple is a 5-tuple consisting of the source IP address,
	         source port, destination IP address, destination port, and transport
	         protocol. In case of ICMP Queries, the tuple is a 3-tuple consisting of 
	         the source IP address, destination IP address, and ICMP Identifier.</t>

         <t>If the incoming IP packet contains a complete (un-fragmented) UDP
         or TCP protocol packet, then the 5-tuple is computed by extracting
         the appropriate fields from the received packet.</t>

		 <t>If the incoming packet is a complete (un-fragmented) ICMP Query message (i.e., an ICMPv4 Query message 
			or an ICMPv6 Informational message), the 3-tuple is the source IP address,
			the destination IP address, and the ICMP Identifier.</t>

         <t>If the incoming IP packet contains a complete (un-fragmented)
         ICMP error message containing a UDP or a TCP packet, then the incoming 5-tuple is computed by extracting the
         appropriate fields from the IP packet embedded inside the ICMP
         error message. However, the role of source and destination is swapped when
         doing this: the embedded source IP address becomes the destination
         IP address in the incoming 5-tuple, the embedded source port becomes the
         destination port in the incoming 5-tuple, etc. If it is not possible to
         determine the incoming 5-tuple (perhaps because not enough of the embedded
         packet is reproduced inside the ICMP message), then the incoming IP
         packet MUST be silently discarded.</t>

         <t>If the incoming IP packet contains a complete (un-fragmented)
         ICMP error message containing an ICMP error message, then the packet is silently discarded.</t>

         <t>If the incoming IP packet contains a complete (un-fragmented)
         ICMP error message containing an ICMP Query message, then the incoming 3-tuple is computed by extracting the
         appropriate fields from the IP packet embedded inside the ICMP
         error message. However, the role of source and destination is swapped when
         doing this: the embedded source IP address becomes the destination
         IP address in the incoming 3-tuple, the embedded destination  IP address becomes the source 
		 address in the incoming 3-tuple, and the embedded ICMP Identifier is used as the ICMP Identifier of the incoming 3-tuple.
         If it is not possible to
         determine the incoming 3-tuple (perhaps because not enough of the embedded
         packet is reproduced inside the ICMP message), then the incoming IP
         packet MUST be silently discarded.</t>


         <t>If the incoming IP packet contains a fragment, then more
         processing may be needed. This specification leaves open the exact
         details of how a NAT64 handles incoming IP packets containing
         fragments, and simply requires that the external behavior of the NAT64
		 be compliant with the following conditions:
			<list>
				<t>The NAT64 MUST handle fragments. In
particular, NAT64 MUST handle fragments arriving out of order,
					conditional on the following:
					<list style="symbols">
						<t>The NAT64 MUST limit the amount of resources
							devoted to the storage of fragmented packets
							in order to protect from DoS attacks. </t>
						<t> As long as the NAT64 has available resources, 
							the NAT64 MUST allow the fragments to arrive 
							over a time interval. The time interval 
							SHOULD be configurable and the default value MUST
							be of at least FRAGMENT_MIN.</t>
						<t> The NAT64 MAY require that the UDP, TCP, or ICMP header be
							completely contained within the fragment that contains 
							fragment offset equal to zero.</t>
						</list></t>

<t>
     For incoming packets carrying TCP or UDP fragments
     with a non-zero  checksum, NAT64 MAY elect to queue the fragments
     as they arrive and translate all fragments at the same time.  In
     this case, the incoming tuple is determined as documented above to
     the un-fragmented packets.  Alternatively, a NAT64 MAY translate
     the fragments as they arrive, by storing information that allows
     it to compute the 5-tuple for fragments other than the first.  In
     the latter case, subsequent fragments may arrive before the first,
     and the rules (in the bulleted list above) about how the NAT64
     handles (out-of-order) fragments apply.
</t>
<t>
     For incoming IPv4 packets carrying UDP packets with a zero
     checksum, if the NAT64 has enough resources, the NAT64 MUST
     reassemble the packets and MUST calculate the checksum.  If the
     NAT64 does not have enough resources, then it MUST silently
     discard the packets. The handling of fragmented and un-fragmented UDP packets with a
     zero checksum as specified above deviates from that specified in
     [RFC7915].
</t>
         		<t>Implementers of NAT64 should be aware that there are a number of
         			well-known attacks against IP fragmentation; see <xref
         			target="RFC1858"></xref> and <xref target="RFC3128"></xref>.
					Implementers should also be aware of additional issues with 
					reassembling packets at high rates, described in <xref target="RFC4963"></xref>. </t>
			</list></t>

		<t>If the incoming packet is an IPv6 packet that
			contains a protocol other than TCP, UDP, or
			ICMPv6 in the last Next Header, then the
			packet SHOULD be discarded and, if the
			security policy permits, the NAT64 SHOULD send
			an ICMPv6 Destination Unreachable error
			message with Code 4 (Port Unreachable)
			to the source address of the received
			packet. NOTE: This behavior may be updated by
			future documents that define how other
			protocols such as SCTP or DCCP are processed
			by NAT64. </t>

		<t>If the incoming packet is an IPv4 packet that contains a protocol other than TCP, UDP, or ICMPv4, then
			the packet SHOULD be discarded and, if the security policy permits, the NAT64 SHOULD send an ICMPv4 Destination Unreachable error message
			with Code 2 (Protocol Unreachable) to the source address of the received packet.  NOTE: This behavior may be updated by future documents
			that define how other protocols such as SCTP or DCCP are processed by NAT64.</t> 


       </section>

       <section anchor="sec-session-info"
                title="Filtering and Updating Binding and Session Information">
         <t>This step updates binding and session information stored in the
         appropriate tables. 
         This step may also filter incoming packets, if desired.</t>

         <t>The details of this step depend on the protocol, i.e., UDP,
         TCP, or ICMP. The behaviors for UDP, TCP, and ICMP Queries are
described in <xref target="UDP-session" />, <xref target="TCP-session" />, and
<xref target="ICMP-Queries-session" />, respectively. For the case of ICMP error messages, they do not affect in any way either the BIBs or the session tables, so there is no processing resulting from these messages in this section. ICMP error message processing continues in <xref target="outgoing tuple" />. </t>

		<t>Irrespective of the transport protocol used, the NAT64 MUST silently discard
			all incoming IPv6 packets containing a source address that contains the Pref64::/n.
			This is required in order to prevent hairpinning loops as described in <xref target="sec"></xref>. 
			In addition, the NAT64   MUST only process incoming 
			IPv6 packets that contain a destination address that contains Pref64::/n.
			Likewise, the NAT64   MUST only process incoming 
			IPv4 packets that contain a destination address that belongs to the IPv4 pool assigned to the NAT64.</t>


         <section anchor="UDP-session" title="UDP Session Handling">
	
	       <t>The following state information is stored for a UDP session:
			<list>
			 <t>Binding:(X',x),(Y',y) &lt;--&gt; (T,t),(Z,z)</t>
	 		 <t>Lifetime: a timer that
	           tracks the remaining lifetime of the UDP session. When the timer
	           expires, the UDP session is deleted. If all the UDP sessions corresponding to a 
			   dynamically created UDP BIB entry are deleted, then the UDP BIB entry is also deleted.</t>
	  		</list></t>

           <t>An IPv6 incoming packet with an incoming tuple with source transport address (X',x) and 
			destination transport address (Y',y) is processed as follows:
			<list>
			   <t>The NAT64 searches 
				for a UDP BIB entry that contains the BIB IPv6 transport address that matches the IPv6 source transport address (X',x). 
				If such an entry does not exist, the NAT64 tries to create a new entry (if resources and policy permit).
				The source IPv6 transport address of the packet
(X',x) is used as the BIB IPv6 transport address,  and
				the BIB IPv4 transport address is set to (T,t), which is allocated using the rules defined in <xref target="UDP transport address alloc"></xref>. 
				The result is a BIB entry as follows: (X',x) &lt;--&gt; (T,t).</t>

               <t>The NAT64 searches for the Session Table Entry
               corresponding to the incoming 5-tuple. If no such entry is
               found,  the NAT64 tries to create a new entry (if resources and policy permit).
				The information included in the session table is as follows:
				<list style="symbols"> 
					<t>The STE source IPv6
					transport address is set to
					(X',x), i.e., the source IPv6
					transport address contained
					in the received IPv6
					packet.</t>

					<t>The STE destination IPv6
					transport address is set to
					(Y',y), i.e., the destination IPv6
					transport address contained
					in the received IPv6
					packet.</t>

					<t>The STE source IPv4 transport address is extracted from the corresponding UDP BIB entry, i.e., it is set to (T,t).</t>
					<t>The STE destination IPv4 transport is set to (Z(Y'),y), y being the same port as
					the STE destination IPv6 transport address and Z(Y') being algorithmically generated from the IPv6 
					destination address (i.e., Y') using the reverse algorithm (see  <xref target="address-transform"></xref>).</t> 
				</list>
					
				The result is a Session Table Entry as follows: 
<vspace blankLines="0"/>
(X',x),(Y',y) &lt;--&gt; (T,t),(Z(Y'),y)</t>

               <t>The NAT64 sets (or resets) the timer in the Session Table
               Entry to the maximum session lifetime. The maximum session lifetime MAY be configurable, and 
			   the default SHOULD be at least UDP_DEFAULT. 
			   The maximum session lifetime MUST NOT be less than UDP_MIN. 
			   The packet is translated and forwarded as described in the following sections.</t>
			</list></t>

           <t>An IPv4 incoming packet, with an incoming tuple with source IPv4 transport address (W,w) and 
			destination IPv4 transport address (T,t) is processed as follows:
			<list>
			   <t>The NAT64 searches 
				for a UDP BIB entry that contains the BIB IPv4 transport address matching (T,t), i.e., the IPv4 destination transport address in the incoming IPv4 packet. 
				If such an entry does not exist, the packet MUST be dropped.  An ICMP error message with Type 3 (Destination Unreachable) MAY be sent to the
	               original sender of the packet. </t>

               <t>If the NAT64
               applies Address-Dependent Filters on its IPv4 interface, then the NAT64 checks to see if
               the incoming packet is allowed according to the
               Address-Dependent Filtering rule. To do this, it searches for 
a Session Table Entry with an STE source IPv4 transport address 
equal to (T,t), i.e., the destination IPv4 transport address in the incoming packet, 
and STE destination IPv4 address 
equal to W, i.e., the source IPv4 address in the incoming packet.
If such an entry
               is found (there may be more than one), packet processing
               continues. Otherwise, the packet is discarded. If the packet
               is discarded, then an ICMP error message MAY be sent to the
               original sender of the packet. The ICMP error message, if sent, has Type
               3 (Destination Unreachable) and Code 13 (Communication
               Administratively Prohibited).
</t>

               <t>In case the packet is not discarded in the previous processing (either because the NAT64 
				is not filtering or because the packet is compliant with the Address-Dependent Filtering rule), 
				then the NAT64 searches for the Session Table Entry
                containing the STE source IPv4 transport address equal 
				to (T,t) and the STE destination IPv4 transport address equal to (W,w). If no such entry is
               found, the NAT64 tries to create a new entry (if resources and policy permit).
				In case a new UDP Session Table Entry is created, it contains the following information:
				<list style="symbols"> 
					<t>The STE source IPv6 transport address is extracted from the corresponding UDP BIB entry.</t>
					<t>The STE destination IPv6 transport address is set to (Y'(W),w), w being the same port w as the source IPv4 
						transport address and Y'(W) being the 
					IPv6 representation of W,  generated using the
					algorithm described in <xref target="address-transform"></xref>.</t>
			<t>The STE source IPv4 transport address is
			set to (T,t), i.e., the destination IPv4 transport
			addresses contained in the received IPv4
			packet.</t>

			<t>The STE destination IPv4 transport is set
			to (W,w), i.e., the source IPv4 transport addresses
			contained in the received IPv4 packet.</t>
				</list></t>

               <t>The NAT64 sets (or resets) the timer in the Session Table
               Entry to the maximum session lifetime.
			   The maximum session lifetime MAY be configurable, and 
			   the default SHOULD be at least UDP_DEFAULT. 
			   The maximum session lifetime MUST NOT be less than UDP_MIN.
			   The packet is translated and forwarded as described in the following sections.</t>
             </list></t>

			<section title="Rules for Allocation of IPv4 Transport Addresses for UDP" anchor="UDP transport address alloc">
				<t>When a new UDP BIB entry is created for a source
	         transport address of (S',s), the NAT64 allocates an IPv4 transport
	         address for this BIB entry as follows:<list style="empty">
	             <t>If there exists some other BIB entry containing S' as the IPv6
	             address and mapping it to some IPv4 address T, then the NAT64 SHOULD use T as the
	             IPv4 address. Otherwise, use any IPv4 address of the IPv4 pool assigned to the NAT64 to be used for translation.</t>

	             <t>If the port s is in the Well-Known port range 0-1023, and the NAT64 has an 
					available port t in the same port range, then the NAT64 SHOULD allocate the port t. 
					If the NAT64 does not have a port available in the same range, 
					the NAT64 MAY assign a port t from another range where it has an available port. 
					(This behavior is recommended in REQ 3-a of <xref target="RFC4787"></xref>.)</t>

	             <t>If the port s is in the range 1024-65535, and the NAT64 has an 
					available port t in the same port range, then the NAT64 SHOULD allocate the port t. 
					If the NAT64 does not have a port available in the same range, 
					the NAT64 MAY assign a port t from another range where it has an available port. 
					(This behavior is recommended in REQ 3-a of <xref target="RFC4787"></xref>.)</t>

				  <t>The NAT64 SHOULD preserve the port parity (odd/even), as 
				  per Section 4.2.2 of <xref target="RFC4787"></xref>).</t>

	             <t>In all cases, the allocated IPv4 transport address (T,t) MUST
	             NOT be in use in another entry in the same BIB, but can be in
	             use in other BIBs (e.g., the TCP and ICMP BIBs).</t>
	           </list>If it is not possible to allocate an appropriate IPv4
	         transport address or create a BIB entry, then the
	         packet is discarded. The NAT64 SHOULD send an ICMPv6
	         Destination Unreachable error message with Code 3 (Address Unreachable). </t>
			</section>

         </section>

         <section anchor="TCP-session" title="TCP Session Handling">
		<t> In this section, we describe how the TCP BIB and session table are populated. 
			We do so by defining the state machine that the NAT64   uses for TCP.
			We first describe the states and the information
contained in them, and then we describe the actual state machine and state transitions.</t>
		
		<section title="State Definition">
	
           <t>The following state information is stored for a TCP session:
			<list>
			 <t>Binding:(X',x),(Y',y) &lt;--&gt; (T,t),(Z,z)</t>
	 		 <t>Lifetime: a timer that
	           tracks the remaining lifetime of the TCP session. When the timer
	           expires, the TCP session is deleted. If all the TCP sessions corresponding to a 
			   TCP BIB entry are deleted, then the dynamically created TCP BIB entry is also deleted.</t>
	  		</list></t>

	<t>Because the TCP session inactivity lifetime is set to at
		least 2 hours and 4 minutes (as
		per <xref target="RFC5382"></xref>), it is important
		that each TCP Session Table Entry corresponds to an
		existing TCP session. In order to do that, for each
		TCP session established, the TCP connection state is
		tracked using the following state machine.
		</t>
				

			<t>The states are as follows:
				<list>
					<t>CLOSED: Analogous to <xref target="RFC0793"></xref>, CLOSED is a fictional state
					  because it represents the state when there is no state for this particular 5-tuple, and therefore
					  no connection.</t> 
					<t>V4 INIT: An IPv4 packet containing a TCP SYN was received by the NAT64, implying that a TCP connection is being initiated from the IPv4 side.
						The NAT64 is now waiting for a matching IPv6 packet containing the TCP SYN in the opposite direction.</t>
					<t>V6 INIT: An IPv6 packet containing a TCP SYN was received, translated, and forwarded
						by the NAT64, implying that a TCP connection is being initiated from the IPv6 side. 
						The NAT64 is now waiting for a matching IPv4 packet containing the TCP SYN in the opposite direction.</t>
					<t>ESTABLISHED: Represents an open connection, with data able to flow in both directions.</t>
					<t>V4 FIN RCV: An IPv4 packet containing a TCP FIN was received by the NAT64, data can still flow in the connection, 
						and the NAT64 is waiting for a matching TCP FIN in the opposite direction.</t>
					<t>V6 FIN RCV: An IPv6 packet containing a TCP FIN was received by the NAT64, data can still flow in the connection, 
							and the NAT64 is waiting for a matching TCP FIN in the opposite direction.</t>
					<t>V6 FIN + V4 FIN RCV: Both an IPv4 packet containing a TCP FIN and an IPv6 packet containing an TCP FIN for
						this connection were received by the NAT64. The NAT64 keeps the connection state alive and forwards packets 
						in both directions for a short period of time to allow remaining packets (in particular, the ACKs) to be delivered.</t>
					<t>TRANS: The lifetime of the state for the connection is set to TCP_TRANS minutes either because a packet containing a TCP RST was received 
						by the NAT64 for this connection or simply because the lifetime of the connection has decreased and there are only TCP_TRANS minutes left. 
						The NAT64 will keep the state
						for the connection for TCP_TRANS minutes, and if no other data packets for that connection are received,
						the state for this connection is then terminated.</t>
				 </list></t>

			</section>
			
			<section title="State Machine for TCP Processing in the NAT64">
				
			<t>The state machine used by the NAT64 for the TCP session processing is depicted next.
				The described state machine handles all TCP segments received through the IPv6 and IPv4 interface.
				There is one state machine per TCP connection that is potentially established through the NAT64. 
				After bootstrapping of the NAT64 device, all TCP sessions are in CLOSED state. As we mention above, 
				the CLOSED state is a fictional state when
there is no state for that
				particular connection in the NAT64. It should be noted that there is one state machine per connection, so only
				packets belonging to a given connection are inputs to the state machine associated to that connection. In other words,
				when in the state machine below we state that a packet is received, it is implicit that the incoming 5-tuple of the data packet
				matches to the one of the state machine.</t>
			
			<t> A TCP segment with the SYN flag set that is received through the IPv6 interface is
					called a V6 SYN, similarly, V4 SYN, V4 FIN, V6 FIN, V6 FIN + V4 FIN, V6 RST, and V4 RST.</t>
								
<t>    The figure presents a simplified version of the state machine; refer to
the
    text for the full specification of the state machine.</t>

			       <figure>
			         <artwork align="center">
                                 +-----------------------------+
                                 |                             |
                                 V                             |
                  V6       +------+      V4                    |
             +----SYN------|CLOSED|-----SYN------+             | 
             |             +------+              |             |
             |                ^                  |             |
             |                |TCP_TRANS T.O.    |             |
             V                |                  V             |
         +-------+         +-------+          +-------+        |
         |V6 INIT|         | TRANS |          |V4 INIT|        |
         +-------+         +-------+          +-------+        |
            |               |    ^               |             |
            |         data pkt   |               |             |
            |               |  V4 or V6 RST      |             |
            |               |  TCP_EST T.O.      |             |
         V4 SYN             V    |              V6 SYN         |
            |          +--------------+          |             |
            +---------&gt;| ESTABLISHED  |&lt;---------+             |
                       +--------------+                        | 
                         |           |                         |
                     V4 FIN       V6 FIN                       |
                         |           |                         |
                         V           V                         |
                 +---------+       +----------+                |
                 | V4 FIN  |       |  V6 FIN  |                |
                 |   RCV   |       |    RCV   |                |
                 +---------+       +----------+                |
                         |           |                         |
                     V6 FIN       V4 FIN                 TCP_TRANS  
                         |           |                        T.O.
                         V           V                         |
                    +---------------------+                    |
                    | V4 FIN + V6 FIN RCV |--------------------+    
                    +---------------------+
				</artwork>
			       </figure>
			
			<t>We next describe the state information and the transitions.</t>
			
				<t>*** CLOSED ***</t> 

<t>If a V6 SYN is received with an incoming tuple with source
transport address (X',x) and destination transport address (Y',y)
(this is the case of a TCP connection initiated from the IPv6 side),
the processing is as follows:

					<list style="numbers">
						<t>The NAT64 searches 
							for a TCP BIB entry that matches the IPv6 source transport address (X',x).
							<list style="empty"> 
								<t>If such an entry does not exist, the NAT64 tries to create a new BIB entry (if resources and policy permit).
								The BIB IPv6
transport address is set to (X',x), i.e., the source IPv6 transport address of the packet. 
								The BIB IPv4 transport address is set to an IPv4 transport address allocated using the rules defined 
								in <xref target="TCP transport address alloc"></xref>.
								The processing  of the packet continues as described in bullet 2.</t>
								<t>If the entry already exists, then the processing continues as described in bullet 2.</t>
							</list></t>
						<t>Then the NAT64 tries to create a new TCP session entry in the TCP session table (if resources and policy permit).
						The information included in the session table is as follows:					
							<list style="empty">
								<t> The STE
source IPv6 transport address is set to (X',x), i.e., the source transport address contained in the received V6 SYN packet.</t> 
								<t> The STE
destination IPv6 transport address is set to (Y',y), i.e., the destination transport address 
									contained in the received V6 SYN packet.</t> 
								<t>The STE source IPv4 transport address is set to the BIB IPv4 transport address of the corresponding TCP BIB entry.</t> 
								<t>The STE destination IPv4 transport address contains the port y (i.e., the same port as
								the IPv6 destination transport address) and the IPv4 address that is algorithmically generated from the IPv6 
								destination address (i.e., Y') using the reverse algorithm as specified in  <xref target="address-transform"></xref>.</t>
								<t>The lifetime of the TCP Session Table Entry is set to at least TCP_TRANS (the 
								transitory connection idle timeout as defined in <xref target="RFC5382"></xref>).</t> 
							</list></t>
						<t>The state of the session is moved to V6 INIT.</t>
						<t>The NAT64 translates and forwards the packet as described 
							in the following sections.</t>
					</list></t>
				<t> If a V4 SYN packet is received with an incoming tuple with source IPv4 transport address (Y,y) and 
						destination IPv4 transport address (X,x) (this is the case of a TCP connection initiated from the IPv4 side), the processing is as follows:
					<list>
					<t> If the security policy requires silently dropping externally initiated TCP connections, then 
						the packet is silently discarded.</t>	


					<t>Else, if the destination transport address contained in the incoming V4 SYN (i.e., X,x) is not in use in the TCP BIB,
					then:
						<list>
							<t>The NAT64 tries to create a new Session Table Entry in the TCP session table (if resources and policy permit), 
								containing the following information:
					 			<list style="symbols">
									<t> The
STE source IPv4 transport address is set to (X,x), i.e., the destination transport address contained in the V4 SYN.</t> 
									<t> The
STE destination IPv4 transport address is set to (Y,y), i.e., the source transport address contained in the V4 SYN.</t> 
									<t>
The STE transport IPv6 source address is left unspecified and may be populated
by other protocols that are out of the scope 
										of this specification.</t>
									<t>The STE destination IPv6 
										transport address contains the port y (i.e., the same port as the STE destination IPv4 transport address) and the 
										IPv6 representation of Y (i.e., the IPv4 address of the STE destination IPv4 transport address), generated using the
										algorithm described in <xref target="address-transform"></xref>.</t> 
								</list></t>
							<t>The state is moved to V4 INIT.</t>
							<t>The lifetime of the STE entry is set to TCP_INCOMING_SYN 
								as per <xref target="RFC5382"></xref>, and the packet is stored. 
								The result is that the NAT64 will not drop the packet based on the filtering, nor create a BIB entry. 
								Instead, the NAT64 will only create the Session Table Entry and store the packet.
								The motivation for this is
								to support simultaneous open of TCP connections.</t>
						</list></t>
					
					<t>If the destination transport address contained in the incoming V4 SYN (i.e., X,x) is in use in the TCP BIB, then:
						<list>
							<t>The NAT64 tries to create a new Session Table Entry in the TCP session table (if resources and policy permit), 
								containing the following information:
					 			<list style="symbols">
									<t> The
STE source IPv4 transport address is set to (X,x), i.e., the destination transport address contained in the V4 SYN.</t> 
									<t> The
STE destination IPv4 transport address is set to (Y,y), i.e., the source transport address contained in the V4 SYN.</t> 
									<t>	The STE transport IPv6 source address is set to the IPv6 transport address contained in the corresponding TCP BIB entry.</t>
									<t>The STE destination IPv6 
										transport address contains the port y (i.e., the same port as the STE destination IPv4 transport address) and the 
										IPv6 representation of Y (i.e., the IPv4 address of the STE destination IPv4 transport address), generated using the
										algorithm described in <xref target="address-transform"></xref>.</t> 
								</list></t>
							<t>The state is moved to V4 INIT.</t>
							<t>If the NAT64 is performing Address-Dependent Filtering, the lifetime of the STE entry is set to TCP_INCOMING_SYN 
								as per <xref target="RFC5382"></xref>, and the packet is stored. The motivation for 
								creating the Session Table Entry and storing the packet (instead of simply dropping the packet based on the filtering) is
								to support simultaneous open of TCP connections.</t>
							<t>If the NAT64 is not performing Address-Dependent Filtering, 	the lifetime of the STE is set to at least TCP_TRANS (the 
								transitory connection idle timeout as defined in <xref target="RFC5382"></xref>), and it translates and forwards the packet as described 
								in the following sections. </t>
						</list></t>
					</list></t>
					
					
				<t>For any other packet belonging to this connection: 
					<list>
					<t>If there is a corresponding entry in the TCP BIB,
					 the packet SHOULD be translated and forwarded if the security policy allows doing so.
					The state remains unchanged.</t>
					<t>If there is no corresponding entry
in the TCP BIB,
					the packet is silently discarded.</t>
					</list>
				</t>	
			
				<t>*** V4 INIT ***</t>

<t>If a V6 SYN is received with incoming tuple with source transport
	address (X',x) and destination transport address (Y',y), then the
	lifetime of the TCP Session Table Entry is set to at least
	the maximum session lifetime. The value for the maximum
	session lifetime MAY be configurable, but it MUST NOT be less
	than TCP_EST (the established connection idle timeout as
	defined in <xref target="RFC5382"></xref>). The default value
	for the maximum session lifetime SHOULD be set to TCP_EST.
	The packet is translated and forwarded. The state is moved to
	ESTABLISHED.</t>

<t>If the lifetime expires, an ICMP Port Unreachable error (Type 3, Code 3) containing the IPv4 SYN packet stored is sent back to 
							the source of the v4 SYN, the Session Table Entry is deleted, and the state is moved to CLOSED.</t>  


				<t>For any other packet, the packet SHOULD be translated and forwarded if the security policy allows doing so. 
				The state remains unchanged.</t>	
				
				<t>*** V6 INIT ***</t>
				<t>If a V4 SYN is received (with or without the ACK flag set), with an incoming tuple with source IPv4 transport address (Y,y) and 
					destination IPv4 transport address (X,x),  then the state is moved to ESTABLISHED.
					The lifetime of the TCP Session Table Entry is set to at least the maximum session lifetime. The value for the maximum 
					session lifetime MAY be configurable, but it MUST NOT be less than TCP_EST (the 
					established connection idle timeout as defined in <xref target="RFC5382"></xref>). The default value for the maximum session lifetime 
					SHOULD be set to TCP_EST.
							The packet is translated and forwarded.</t>			
				<t>If the lifetime expires, the Session Table Entry is deleted, and the state is moved to CLOSED.</t>
				<t>If a V6 SYN packet is received, the packet is translated and forwarded. 
					The lifetime of the TCP Session Table Entry is set to at least TCP_TRANS. The state remains unchanged.</t> 
				<t>For any other packet, the packet SHOULD be translated and forwarded if the security policy allows doing so. 
					The state remains unchanged.</t>	
				
				<t>*** ESTABLISHED ***</t>
				<t>If a V4 FIN packet is received, the packet is translated and forwarded. 
				   The state is moved to V4 FIN RCV.</t>
				<t>If a V6 FIN packet is received, the packet is translated and forwarded. 
				   The state is moved to V6 FIN RCV.</t>
				<t>If a V4 RST or a V6 RST packet is received, the packet is translated and forwarded. The lifetime is set to TCP_TRANS and
					the state is moved to TRANS. (Since the NAT64 is uncertain whether the peer will accept the RST packet, instead of moving the state to
					CLOSED, it moves to TRANS, which has a shorter lifetime. If no other packets are received for this connection during the 
					short timer, the NAT64 assumes that the peer has accepted the RST packet and moves to CLOSED. If packets keep flowing,
					the NAT64 assumes that the peer has not accepted the RST packet and moves back to the ESTABLISHED state. 
					This is described below in the TRANS state processing description.)</t>
				<t>If any other packet is received, the packet is translated and forwarded.
					The lifetime of the TCP Session Table Entry is set to at least the maximum session lifetime. The value for the maximum 
					session lifetime MAY be configurable, but it MUST NOT be less than TCP_EST (the 
					established connection idle timeout as defined in <xref target="RFC5382"></xref>). The default value for the maximum session lifetime 
					SHOULD be set to TCP_EST.
					The state remains unchanged as ESTABLISHED.</t>
				<t>If the lifetime expires, then the NAT64 SHOULD send a probe packet (as defined next) to at least one of the endpoints
					of the TCP connection. The probe packet is a TCP segment for the connection with no data. The sequence number and 
					the acknowledgment number are set to
zero. All flags but the ACK flag are set to zero. The state is moved to TRANS. 
					<list>
						<t>Upon the reception of this probe packet, the endpoint will reply with an ACK containing the expected sequence number for 
							that connection. It should be noted that, for an active connection, each of these probe packets will generate one packet
							from each end involved in the connection, since the reply of the first point to the probe packet will generate a reply
							from the other endpoint.</t>
					</list>
						</t> 
				
									
				<t>*** V4 FIN RCV ***</t>
				<t>If a V6 FIN packet is received, the packet is translated and forwarded. 
				   The lifetime is set to TCP_TRANS. The state is moved to V6 FIN + V4 FIN RCV.</t>
				<t>If any packet other than the V6 FIN is received, the packet is translated and forwarded.
					The lifetime of the TCP Session Table Entry is set to at least the maximum session lifetime. The value for the maximum 
					session lifetime MAY be configurable, but it MUST NOT be less than TCP_EST (the 
					established connection idle timeout as defined in <xref target="RFC5382"></xref>). The default value for the maximum session lifetime 
					SHOULD be set to TCP_EST.
					The state remains unchanged as V4 FIN RCV.</t>				
				<t>If the lifetime expires, the Session Table Entry is deleted, and the state is moved to CLOSED.</t>
				
				<t>*** V6 FIN RCV ***</t>
				<t>If a V4 FIN packet is received, the packet is translated and forwarded. 
				   The lifetime is set to TCP_TRANS. The state is moved to V6 FIN + V4 FIN RCV.</t>
				<t>If any packet other than the V4 FIN is received, the packet is translated and forwarded. 
					The lifetime of the TCP Session Table Entry is set to at least the maximum session lifetime. The value for the maximum 
					session lifetime MAY be configurable, but it MUST NOT be less than TCP_EST (the 
					established connection idle timeout as defined in <xref target="RFC5382"></xref>). The default value for the maximum session lifetime 
					SHOULD be set to TCP_EST.
					The state remains unchanged as V6 FIN RCV.</t>				
				<t>If the lifetime expires, the Session Table Entry is deleted and the state is moved to CLOSED.</t>

				<t>*** V6 FIN + V4 FIN RCV ***</t>
				<t>All packets are translated and forwarded.</t>
				<t>If the lifetime expires, the Session Table Entry is deleted and the state is moved to CLOSED.</t>

				<t>*** TRANS ***</t>
				<t>If a packet other than a RST packet is received, 
					the lifetime of the TCP Session Table Entry is set to at least the maximum session lifetime. The value for the maximum 
					session lifetime MAY be configurable, but it MUST NOT be less than TCP_EST (the 
					established connection idle timeout as defined in <xref target="RFC5382"></xref>). The default value for the maximum session lifetime 
					SHOULD be set to TCP_EST.
					The state is moved to ESTABLISHED.</t>
				<t>If the lifetime expires, the Session Table Entry is deleted and the state is moved to CLOSED.</t>

		
			</section>
			
			<section title="Rules for Allocation of IPv4 Transport Addresses for TCP" anchor="TCP transport address alloc">
				<t>When a new TCP BIB entry is created for a source
	         transport address of (S',s), the NAT64 allocates an IPv4 transport
	         address for this BIB entry as follows:<list style="empty">
	             <t>If there exists some other BIB entry in any of the BIBs
that contains S' as the IPv6
	             address and maps it to some IPv4 address T, then T SHOULD be used as the
	             IPv4 address. Otherwise, use any IPv4 address of the IPv4 pool assigned to the NAT64 to be used for translation.</t>

	             <t>If the port s is in the Well-Known port range 0-1023, and the NAT64 has an 
					available port t in the same port range, then the NAT64 SHOULD allocate the port t. 
					If the NAT64 does not have a port available in the same range, 
					the NAT64 MAY assign a port t from another range where it has an available port. </t>

	             <t>If the port s is in the range 1024-65535, and the NAT64 has an 
					available port t in the same port range, then the NAT64 SHOULD allocate the port t. 
					If the NAT64 does not have a port available in the same range, 
					the NAT64 MAY assign a port t from another range where it has an available port. </t>

	             <t>In all cases, the allocated IPv4 transport address (T,t) MUST
	             NOT be in use in another entry in the same BIB, but can be in
	             use in other BIBs (e.g., the UDP and ICMP BIBs).</t>
	           </list>

If it is not possible to allocate an appropriate IPv4
transport address or create a BIB entry, then the
packet is discarded. The NAT64 SHOULD send an ICMPv6
Destination Unreachable error message with Code 3 (Address Unreachable). </t>
			</section>
			</section>				
			<section anchor="ICMP-Queries-session" title="ICMP Query Session Handling">
				
				<t>The following state information is stored for an ICMP Query session in the ICMP Query session table:
				<list>
				 <t>Binding:(X',Y',i1) &lt;--&gt; (T,Z,i2)</t>
		 		 <t>Lifetime: a timer that
		           tracks the remaining lifetime of the ICMP Query session. When the timer
		           expires, the session is deleted. If all the ICMP Query sessions corresponding to a 
				   dynamically created ICMP Query BIB entry are deleted, then the ICMP Query BIB entry is also deleted.</t>
		  		</list></t>

           <t>An incoming ICMPv6 Informational packet with IPv6 source address
X', IPv6 destination address Y', and ICMPv6 Identifier i1 is processed as follows:
			<list>
			   <t>
				If the local security policy determines that ICMPv6 Informational packets are to be filtered, the packet is silently discarded.
				Else, the NAT64 searches 
				for an ICMP Query BIB entry that matches the (X',i1) pair. 
				If such an entry does not exist, the NAT64 tries to create a new entry (if resources and policy permit) with the following data:
				<list style="symbols">
					<t>The BIB IPv6 address is set to X' (i.e., the source IPv6 address of the IPv6 packet).</t>
					<t>The BIB ICMPv6 Identifier is set to i1 (i.e., the ICMPv6 Identifier).</t>
					<t>If there exists another BIB entry in
any of the BIBs that contains the same IPv6
	             		address X' and maps it to an IPv4 address T, then use T as the
	             		BIB IPv4 address for this new entry. Otherwise, use any IPv4 address assigned to the IPv4
	             		interface.</t>

	<t>Any available value is used as the BIB ICMPv4 Identifier,
		i.e., any identifier value for which no other entry
		exists with the same (IPv4 address, ICMPv4 Identifier)
		pair.</t>

				</list></t>

               <t>The NAT64 searches for an ICMP Query Session Table Entry
               corresponding to the incoming 3-tuple (X',Y',i1). If no such entry is
               found, the NAT64 tries to create a new entry (if resources and policy permit).
				The information included in the new Session Table Entry is as follows: 
				<list style="symbols">
					<t>The STE IPv6 source address is set to X' (i.e., the address contained in the received IPv6 packet).</t> 
					<t>The STE IPv6 destination address is set to Y' (i.e., the address contained in the received IPv6 packet).</t> 
					<t>The STE ICMPv6 Identifier is set to i1 (i.e., the identifier contained in the received IPv6 packet).</t> 
					<t>The STE IPv4 source address is set to the IPv4 address contained in the corresponding BIB entry.</t> 
					<t>The STE ICMPv4 Identifier is set to the IPv4 identifier contained in the corresponding BIB entry.</t> 
 					<t>The STE IPv4 destination address is algorithmically generated from Y' using the reverse algorithm as
	 					specified in  <xref target="address-transform"></xref>.</t>
				</list></t>
               <t>The NAT64 sets (or resets) the timer in the session table
               entry to the maximum session lifetime. By default, the maximum
               session lifetime is ICMP_DEFAULT. The maximum lifetime value SHOULD be configurable.
 			   The packet is translated and forwarded as described in the following sections.</t>
			</list></t>

           <t>An incoming ICMPv4 Query packet with source IPv4 address
	Y, destination IPv4 address X, and ICMPv4 Identifier i2 is
	processed as follows:

			<list>
			   <t>The NAT64 searches for an ICMP Query BIB
				entry that contains X as the IPv4
				address and i2 as the ICMPv4
				Identifier.  If such an entry does not
				exist, the packet is dropped.  An ICMP
				error message MAY be sent to the
				original sender of the packet. The
				ICMP error message, if sent, has Type
				3, Code 1 (Host Unreachable).</t>

               <t>In contrast to the TCP and UDP specifications in previous sections, the definition of the ICMP Query session does not allow for a situation where multiple sessions might share T, t and Z but not z (as t and z do not exist), which means ICMP does not have an analogous Address-Dependent Filtering rule to apply at this stage.</t>
			   
			   <t>Consequently, in case the packet is not discarded in the previous
			     processing steps, the NAT64
			     then searches for a Session Table Entry with an STE source
			     IPv4 address equal to X, an STE ICMPv4 Identifier
			     equal to i2, and a STE destination IPv4 address equal
			     to Y. If no such entry is found, the NAT64 tries to
			     create a new entry (if resources and policy permit)
			     with the following information:

				<list style="symbols">
					<t>The STE source IPv4 address is set to X.</t> 
					<t>The STE ICMPv4 Identifier is set to i2.</t> 
					<t>The STE destination IPv4 address is set to Y.</t>
					<t>The STE source IPv6 address is set to the IPv6 address of the corresponding BIB entry.</t>
					<t>The STE ICMPv6 Identifier is set to the ICMPv6 Identifier of the corresponding BIB entry.</t>
					<t>The STE destination IPv6 address is set to the 
				IPv6 representation of the IPv4 address of Y, generated using the
				algorithm described in <xref target="address-transform"></xref>.</t>
               <t>The NAT64 sets (or resets) the timer in the session table
               entry to the maximum session lifetime. By default, the maximum
               session lifetime is ICMP_DEFAULT. The maximum lifetime value SHOULD be configurable.
 			   The packet is translated and forwarded as described in the following sections.</t>
             </list></t>
			</list></t>

         </section>
			
		<section title="Generation of the IPv6 Representations of IPv4 Addresses" anchor="address-transform">

						<t>NAT64 supports multiple
algorithms for the generation of the IPv6 representation of an IPv4 address and
vice versa.
							The constraints imposed on the generation algorithms are the following:
							<list>
								<t>The
algorithm MUST be reversible, i.e., it MUST be possible to derive the original IPv4 address
									from the IPv6 representation. </t>
								<t>The input for the algorithm MUST be limited to the IPv4 address, the IPv6 prefix (denoted Pref64::/n) used in the
									IPv6 representations, and optionally a set of stable parameters that are 
									configured
in the NAT64 (such as a fixed string to be used as a suffix).
									<list>
<t>	If we note n the length of the prefix Pref64::/n, then n MUST be less
than or equal to 96.
If a Pref64::/n is configured through any means in the NAT64 
(such as manually configured, or other automatic means not specified 
in this document), the default algorithm MUST use this prefix. 
If no prefix is available, the algorithm SHOULD use the Well-Known Prefix 
(64:ff9b::/96) defined in <xref target="RFC6052" />.</t>
									</list></t>

							</list></t>
						<t>NAT64 MUST support the algorithm for generating IPv6 representations of IPv4 addresses defined in 
							Section 2.3 of <xref
target="RFC6052" />. 

The aforementioned algorithm SHOULD be used as default algorithm.</t>

			</section>


         </section>



       <section anchor="outgoing tuple" title="Computing the Outgoing Tuple">
         <t>This step computes the outgoing tuple by translating the
         IP addresses and port numbers or ICMP Identifier in the incoming tuple. </t>

         <t>In the text below, a reference to a BIB means the
         TCP BIB, the UDP BIB, or the ICMP Query BIB, as appropriate.</t>

         <t><list>
             <t>NOTE: Not all addresses are translated using the BIB. BIB
             entries are used to translate IPv6 source transport addresses to
             IPv4 source transport addresses, and IPv4 destination transport
             addresses to IPv6 destination transport addresses. They are NOT
             used to translate IPv6 destination transport addresses to IPv4
             destination transport addresses, nor to translate IPv4 source
             transport addresses to IPv6 source transport addresses. The latter
             cases are handled by applying the algorithmic transformation described 
			 in <xref target="address-transform"></xref>. This
             distinction is important; without it, hairpinning doesn't work
             correctly.</t>
           </list></t>

		<section title="Computing the Outgoing 5-Tuple for TCP, UDP, and for ICMP Error Messages Containing a TCP or UDP Packets">

		<t>The transport protocol
         in the outgoing 5-tuple is always the same as that in the incoming
         5-tuple. 
    When translating from IPv4 ICMP to IPv6 ICMP, the protocol number in the
last
    next header field in the protocol chain is set to 58 (IPv6-ICMP). When
translating
    from IPv6 ICMP to IPv4 ICMP, the protocol number in the protocol field of
the IP
    header is set to 1 (ICMP).</t>

         <t>When translating in the IPv6 --&gt; IPv4 direction, let the
         source and destination transport addresses in the incoming 5-tuple be (S',s)
         and (D',d), respectively. The outgoing source transport address is
         computed as follows: if the BIB contains an entry (S',s) &lt;--&gt; (T,t), then the
             outgoing source transport address is (T,t).</t>

 
         <t>The outgoing destination address is computed
	         algorithmically from D' using the address transformation described in 
			 <xref target="address-transform"></xref>.</t>

        <t>When translating in the IPv4 --&gt; IPv6 direction, let the
	         source and destination transport addresses in the incoming 5-tuple be (S,s)
	         and (D,d), respectively. The outgoing source transport address is
	         computed as follows: <list style="empty">
	             <t>The outgoing source transport address is generated from S using the address transformation algorithm described in
				<xref target="address-transform"></xref>.</t>
				<t>The BIB table is searched for an entry  (X',x) &lt;--&gt; (D,d), and if one is found, the outgoing destination transport address is set to (X',x).</t>
	           </list></t>


		</section>

		<section anchor="outgoing 3-tuple" title="Computing the Outgoing 3-Tuple for ICMP Query Messages and for ICMP Error Messages Containing an ICMP Query">

         <t>When translating in the IPv6 --&gt; IPv4 direction, let the
         source and destination addresses in the incoming 3-tuple be S'
         and D', respectively, and the ICMPv6 Identifier be i1. The outgoing source address is
         computed as follows: the BIB contains an entry (S',i1) &lt;--&gt; (T,i2), then the
             outgoing source address is T and the ICMPv4 Identifier is i2.</t>
 
         <t>The outgoing IPv4 destination address is computed
         algorithmically from D' using the address transformation described in 
		 <xref target="address-transform"></xref>.</t>

         <t>When translating in the IPv4 --&gt; IPv6 direction, let the
         source and destination addresses in the incoming 3-tuple be S
         and D, respectively, and the ICMPv4 Identifier is i2. The outgoing source address is
         generated from S using the address transformation algorithm described in
		<xref target="address-transform"></xref>.
           The BIB is searched for an entry containing (X',i1) &lt;--&gt; (D,i2), and, if found,
             the outgoing destination address is X' and the outgoing ICMPv6 Identifier is i1.</t>
		</section>


       </section>

       <section title="Translating the Packet">
         <t>This step translates the packet from IPv6 to IPv4 or vice versa.</t>

         <t>The translation of the packet is as specified in Sections 4 and
          5 of the <xref target="RFC7915">IP/ICMP Translation Algorithm</xref>, with the following
         modifications:<list style="symbols">
             <t>When translating an IP header (Sections 4.1 and 5.1 of
             <xref target="RFC7915"/>), the
             source and destination IP address fields are set to the source
             and destination IP addresses from the outgoing tuple as determined in  <xref target="outgoing tuple"></xref>.</t>

             <t>When the protocol following the IP header is TCP or UDP, then
             the source and destination ports are modified to the source and
             destination ports from the outgoing 5-tuple. In addition, the TCP or UDP
             checksum must also be updated to reflect the translated
             addresses and ports; note that the TCP and UDP checksum covers
             the pseudo-header that contains the source and destination IP
             addresses. An algorithm for efficiently updating these checksums
             is described in <xref target="RFC3022"></xref>.</t>

			 <t>When the protocol following the IP header is ICMP and it is an ICMP Query message, 
				the ICMP Identifier is set to the one from the outgoing 3-tuple as determined in  <xref target="outgoing 3-tuple"></xref>.</t>

             <t>When the protocol following the IP header is ICMP and it is an ICMP error message, 
			  the source and destination transport addresses in
             the embedded packet are set to the destination and source
             transport addresses from the outgoing 5-tuple (note the swap of
             source and destination).</t>

           </list></t>

		<t>The size of outgoing packets as well and the potential need for fragmentation
			is done according to the behavior defined in the <xref target="RFC7915">IP/ICMP Translation Algorithm</xref>.
		</t>

       </section>

       <section title="Handling Hairpinning">
         <t>If the destination IP address of the translated packet is an IPv4 address assigned to the NAT64
         itself, then the packet is a hairpin packet. 
 		 Hairpin packets are processed as follows:
		 <list style="symbols">
			<t> The outgoing 5-tuple becomes the incoming 5-tuple.</t>
			<t> The packet is treated as if it was received on the outgoing interface.</t> 
		    <t> Processing of the packet continues at step 2 -- "Filtering and Updating Binding and 
		 Session Information" (<xref target="sec-session-info"/>).</t>
		</list></t>
       </section>

</section>

<section title="Protocol Constants">

	<t>UDP_MIN: 2 minutes (as defined in <xref target="RFC4787"></xref>) </t>
	<t>UDP_DEFAULT: 5 minutes (as defined in <xref target="RFC4787"></xref>)</t>
	<t>TCP_TRANS: 4 minutes (as defined in <xref target="RFC5382"></xref>)</t>
	<t>TCP_EST: 2 hours (The minimum lifetime for an established TCP session defined in <xref target="RFC5382"></xref> 
	is 2 hours and 4 minutes, which is achieved by adding the 2 hours with this timer and the 4 minutes with the TCP_TRANS timer.)</t>
	<t>TCP_INCOMING_SYN: 6 seconds (as defined in <xref target="RFC5382"></xref>)</t>
	<t>FRAGMENT_MIN: 2 seconds</t>
	<t>ICMP_DEFAULT: 60 seconds (as defined in <xref target="RFC5508"></xref>)</t>
	

</section>


<section title="Implementation Status">
    <t>Note to RFC Editor: If this document needs to be published, please remove this section before publication, as it is only intended for the IESG evaluation.</t>
    
    <t>This section summarized the known status of existing and interoperable implementations of the protocol subject of this document, as well as closely related protocols. This is following (<xref target="RFC7942"/>) and intended to assist the relevant WGs, IESG and IETF as a whole, in the evaluation of the document for the document progress through the standardization process.</t>
    
    <t>The description of the implementations does not imply any IETF endorsement and is solely based on public available information, which has not been formally confirmed by specific interoperatbility testing for this document publication; however, it is known to be confirmed by existing commercial working deployments worldwide and without knows interoperability issues.</t>
    
    <t>Stateful NAT64: Network Address and Protocol Translation from IPv6 Clients to IPv4 Servers (<xref target="RFC6146"/>) was originally published in April 2011.</t>
    
    <t>(<xref target="RFC6146"/>) is implemented together with other related protocols (just to name a few of the most relevant ones) such as:</t>
    <t><list style="symbols">
        <t>IPv6 Addressing of IPv4/IPv6 Translators (<xref target="RFC6052"/>).</t>
        <t>IP/ICMP Translation Algorithm (<xref target="RFC7915"/>).</t>
    </list></t>
    
    <t>Follows a list of known implementations by different products/vendors, known to be mature and in production products/networks/services worlwide:</t>
    <t><list style="symbols">
        <t>6Wind. Implemented in multiple products. https://www.6wind.com/6wind-cg-nat-vrouter-with-nat64/.</t>
        <t>A10. Implemented in multiple products.</t>
        <t>AlliedTelesis. Implemented in multiple products. https://www.alliedtelesis.com/sites/default/files/documents/configuration-guides/transitioning_ipv4_to_ipv6_feature_overview_guide.pdf.</t>
        <t>Amazon. Virtual Private Cloud. https://docs.aws.amazon.com/vpc/latest/userguide/nat-gateway-nat64-dns64.html.</t>
        <t>Apple. Implemented since 2016. https://developer.apple.com/library/archive/documentation/NetworkingInternetWeb/Conceptual/NetworkingOverview/UnderstandingandPreparingfortheIPv6Transition/UnderstandingandPreparingfortheIPv6Transition.html.</t>
        <t>Arista. Implemented in multiple products. https://www.arista.com/en/support/toi/eos-4-24-0f/14495-map-t-border-relay.</t>
        <t>Broadcom. Implemented in VMWare. https://techdocs.broadcom.com/us/en/vmware-cis/nsx/nsxt-dc/3-1/administration-guide/network-address-translation/configure-an-nsx-nat64.html.</t>
        <t>Cisco. Implemented in multiple series of products since 2010. https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/routers/ios/config/17-x/ip-addressing/b-ip-addressing/m_iadnat-stateless-nat64.html.</t>
        <t>Ecdysis. http://ecdysis.viagenie.ca/.</t>
        <t>F5. Implemented in multiple products. https://techdocs.f5.com/kb/en-us/products/big-ip_ltm/manuals/product/cgn-implementations-11-6-0/2.html.</t>
        <t>Fortinet. Implemented in multiple products. https://docs.fortinet.com/document/fortigate/7.4.6/fortinet-carrier-grade-nat-field-reference-architecture-guide/891965/nat64.</t>
        <t>Huawei. Implemented in multiple series of products. https://support.huawei.com/enterprise/en/doc/EDOC1100278545/fe351de4/nat64-configuration.</t>
        <t>Infoblox. Implemented as part of the DNS64 support. https://www.a10networks.com/products/thunder-cgn/.</t>
        <t>Jool. Implmemented since 2014. https://nicmx.github.io/Jool/en/index.html.</t>
        <t>Juniper. Implemented in multiple series of products. https://www.juniper.net/documentation/us/en/software/nce/nce-nat64-ipv6-ipv4-depletion/topics/concept/ipv6-nat64-ipv4-depletion-overview.html.</t>
        <t>Nokia. Implemented in multiple products. https://documentation.nokia.com/html/0_add-h-f/93-0262-HTML/7750_SR_OS_MSISA_Guide/Application-Assurance-NAT.pdf.</t>
        <t>OpenWRT. https://github.com/openwrt.</t>
        <t>Palo Alto. Implemented in multiple products. https://docs.paloaltonetworks.com/ngfw/networking/nat64.</t>
        <t>Sophos. Implemented in multiple products. https://news.sophos.com/en-us/2025/04/08/sophos-firewall-v21-5-early-access-is-now-available/.</t>
        <t>Tayga. Implemented as part of the NAT64 support. https://github.com/openthread/tayga.</t>
        <t>VPP. https://docs.fd.io/vpp/17.07/nat64_doc.html.</t>
        <t>ZTE. Implemented in multiple products. https://www.zte.com.cn/global/product_index/ip_network_en/68e_e/zxr10-6800e/zxr10-6800e.html.</t>
    </list></t>
    
    <t>Note that even an effort has been done to compile an extensive list (including a relevant URL), there may be many more implementations not publicly known, so this list doesn't pretent to be exclusive, just an indication of a sufficient number of implementations, as required for the evaluation of the current implementation status.</t>
</section>

<section title="IANA Considerations">
    <t>All references to <xref target="RFC6146"/> in the following registry groups should be replaced with references to this document:</t>
    <t><list style="symbols">
        <t>Service Function Chaining Service Function Types. https://www.iana.org/assignments/service-function-chaining-service-function-types/service-function-chaining-service-function-types.xhtml.</t>
        <t>IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX) Entities. https://www.iana.org/assignments/ipfix/ipfix.xhtml.</t>
    </list></t>
</section>

   <section anchor="sec" title="Security Considerations">
     <section title="Implications on End-to-End Security">
    <t>Any protocols that protect IP header information are essentially incompatible
	with NAT64. This implies that end-to-end IPsec verification will fail when 
	the Authentication Header (AH) is used (both transport and tunnel mode) and when ESP is used in transport mode. 
	This is inherent in any network-layer translation mechanism. End-to-end IPsec protection
	can be restored, using UDP encapsulation as described in <xref target="RFC3948"></xref>.
	The actual extensions to support IPsec are out of the scope of this document.</t>
</section>

	<section title="Filtering">
	<t>NAT64 creates binding state using packets flowing from the IPv6 side
   to the IPv4 side.  In accordance with the procedures defined in this
	document following the guidelines defined in  
	<xref target="RFC4787"></xref>, a NAT64 MUST offer
   "Endpoint-Independent Mapping". This means:
	<list>
		
	<t>For any IPv6 packet with source (S'1,s1) and destination (Pref64::D1,d1) that creates an external mapping to (S1,s1v4), (D1,d1),
    for any subsequent packet from (S'1,s1) to (Pref64::D2,d2)
    that creates an external mapping to (S2,s2v4), (D2,d2), within
    a given binding timer window,</t>

	<t>	      (S1,s1v4) = (S2,s2v4) for all values of D2,d2</t>
	</list></t>

  <t>Implementations MAY also provide support for "Address-Dependent
  Mapping" as also defined 
	in this document and following the guidelines defined in 
	<xref target="RFC4787"></xref>.</t>

  <t>The security
  properties, however, are determined by which packets the NAT64 filter
  allows in and which it does not. The security properties are
  determined by the filtering behavior and filtering configuration
  in the filtering portions of the NAT64, not by the address mapping
  behavior. For example:
	<list>
		
   <t> Without filtering - When "Endpoint-Independent
  Mapping" is used in NAT64, once a binding is created in the
  IPv6 ---> IPv4 direction, packets from any node on the IPv4 side
  destined to the IPv6 transport address will traverse the
  NAT64 gateway and be forwarded to the IPv6 transport address
  that created the binding. However,</t>

  <t>  With filtering - When "Endpoint-Independent
  Mapping" is used in NAT64, once a binding is created in the
  IPv6 ---> IPv4 direction, packets from any node on the IPv4 side
  destined to the IPv6 transport address will first be processed
  against the filtering rules. If the source IPv4 address is
  permitted, the packets will be forwarded to the IPv6 transport
  address. If the source IPv4 address is explicitly denied -- or the
  default policy is to deny all addresses not explicitly permitted
  -- then the packet will be discarded. A dynamic filter may be
  employed whereby the filter will only allow packets from the
  IPv4 address to which the original packet that created the binding
  was sent. This means that only the IPv4 addresses to which the
  IPv6 host has initiated connections will be able to reach the IPv6
  transport address, and no others. This essentially narrows the
  effective operation of the NAT64 device to an
  "Address-Dependent Mapping" behavior, though not by its
  mapping behavior, but instead by its filtering behavior.</t>
	</list></t>

<t>	As currently specified, the NAT64 only requires
	filtering traffic based on the 5-tuple.  In some cases (e.g., statically
	configured mappings), this may make it easy for an attacker to guess.  
	An attacker need not be able to guess other fields, e.g., the TCP sequence
	number, to get a packet through the NAT64.  While such traffic might be
	dropped by the final destination, it does not provide additional
	mitigations against bandwidth/CPU attacks targeting the internal network.
	To avoid this type of abuse, a NAT64 MAY keep track of the sequence number 
	of TCP packets in order to verify the proper sequencing of exchanged segments, 
	in particular, those of the SYNs and the FINs.</t>


</section>

	<section title="Attacks on NAT64">
	<t>The NAT64 device itself is a potential victim of different types of
	   attacks.  In particular, the NAT64 can be a victim of DoS attacks.
	   The NAT64 device has a limited number of resources that can be consumed
	   by attackers creating a DoS attack.  The NAT64 has a limited number
	   of IPv4 addresses that it uses to create the bindings.  Even though the
	   NAT64 performs address and port translation, it is possible for an
	   attacker to consume all the IPv4 transport addresses by sending IPv6
	   packets with different source IPv6 transport addresses.  This attack 
	   can only be launched from the IPv6 side, since
	   IPv4 packets are not used to create binding state.  DoS attacks can
	   also affect other limited resources available in the NAT64 such as
	   memory or link capacity. For instance, it is possible for an attacker 
	   to launch a DoS attack on the memory of the NAT64 device by sending
	   fragments that the NAT64 will store for a given period.  If the
	   number of fragments is high enough, the memory of the NAT64 could be
	   exhausted.  Similarly, a DoS attack against the NAT64 can be crafted by sending either
	V4 or V6 SYN packets that consume memory in the form of session and/or binding table
	entries. In the case of IPv4 SYNs the situation is aggravated by the requirement to also store the data packets
	for a given amount of time, requiring more memory from the NAT64 device.
	 NAT64 devices MUST implement proper protection against
	   such attacks, for instance, allocating a limited amount of memory for
	   fragmented packet storage as specified in <xref target="incoming tuple"></xref>.
	   
	</t>
	<t>Another consideration related to NAT64 resource depletion refers to the 
		preservation of binding state. Attackers may try to keep a binding state
		alive forever by sending periodic packets that refresh the state. In
		order to allow the NAT64 to defend against such attacks, the NAT64 MAY
		choose not to extend the session entry lifetime for a specific entry upon the reception 
		of packets for that entry through the external interface. As described in the
		framework document  <xref target="RFC6144"></xref>, the NAT64
		can be deployed in multiple scenarios, in some of which the
Internet side is the IPv6 one, and in others of which the Internet side is the IPv4 one. It is then important to properly
		set which is the Internet side of the NAT64 in each specific configuration.</t>
	
</section>
	<section title="Avoiding Hairpinning Loops">
	
	<t>If an IPv6-only client can guess the IPv4 binding address that will be
	created, it can use the IPv6 representation of that address as the source address for
	creating this binding. Then, any packet sent to the binding's IPv4
	address could loop in the NAT64. This is prevented in the current specification 
	by filtering incoming packets containing Pref64::/n in the source
address, as described below.</t>


	<t>Consider the following example:</t>
	
	<t>Suppose that the IPv4 pool is 192.0.2.0/24</t>

	<t>Then, the IPv6-only client sends this to NAT64:
		<list>
			<t>Source: [Pref64::192.0.2.1]:500</t>
			<t>Destination: any</t>
		</list></t>
		
	<t>The NAT64 allocates 192.0.2.1:500 as the IPv4 binding address.
		Now anything sent to 192.0.2.1:500, be it a hairpinned IPv6 packet or an
		IPv4 packet, could loop.</t>


	<t>It is not hard to guess the IPv4 address that will be allocated.
		First, the attacker creates a binding and uses (for example)
	Simple Traversal of the UDP Protocol through NAT (STUN) <xref target="RFC5389"/> to learn its external IPv4 address. New bindings will always have this
	address. Then, it uses a source port in the range 1-1023. This will
	increase the chances to 1/512 (since range and parity are
	preserved by NAT64 in UDP). </t>

	<t>In order to address this vulnerability, the NAT64 MUST drop IPv6 
		packets whose source address is in Pref64::/n, as defined in <xref target="sec-session-info"></xref>. </t>

</section>
   </section>

   <section title="Contributors (original authors of RFC6146 (2011)">

       <author fullname="Marcelo Bagnulo" initials="M." surname="Bagnulo">
         <organization>UC3M</organization>

         <address>
           <postal>
             <street>Av. Universidad 30</street>

             <city>Leganes</city>

             <region>Madrid</region>

             <code>28911</code>

             <country>Spain</country>
           </postal>

           <phone>+34-91-6249500</phone>

           <email>marcelo@it.uc3m.es</email>

           <uri>http://www.it.uc3m.es/marcelo</uri>
         </address>
       </author>

       <author fullname="Philip Matthews" initials="P." surname="Matthews">
         <organization abbrev="Alcatel-Lucent">Alcatel-Lucent</organization>

         <address>
           <postal>
             <street>    600 March Road</street>

             <city>Ottawa</city>

             <region>Ontario</region>

             <code></code>

             <country>Canada</country>
           </postal>

           <phone>+1 613-592-4343 x224</phone>

           <email>philip_matthews@magma.ca</email>

         </address>
       </author>


            <author initials="I" surname="van Beijnum" fullname="Iljitsch van Beijnum">
                <organization>IMDEA Networks</organization>
                <address>
                    <postal>
                        <street>Avda. del Mar Mediterraneo, 22</street>
                        <city>Leganes</city>
                        <region>Madrid</region>
                        <code>28918</code>
                        <country>Spain</country>
                    </postal>
                    <email>iljitsch@muada.com</email>
                </address>
            </author>

   </section>

 
 <section title="Contributors">

<?rfc subcompact="yes"?>

	<t>George Tsirtsis</t>
   <list>
     <t>Qualcomm</t>
	<t>tsirtsis@googlemail.com</t>
   </list>    


	<t>Greg Lebovitz</t>
   <list>
     <t>Juniper</t>
	<t>gregory.ietf@gmail.com</t>
   </list>


	<t>Simon Perreault</t>
   <list>
     <t>Viagenie</t>
	<t>simon.perreault@viagenie.ca</t>
   </list>

<?rfc subcompact="no"?>

   </section>

   <section title="Acknowledgements">

    <t>Special thanks to Alberto Leiva Popper, which not only reported errata 4756, but also engaged in private discussions and provided a very detailed explanation, as experienced NAT64 implementor (Jool), easing the job to draft the text for resolving this errata. Also to Marc Lepage, who reported errata 8416.</t>
       
	<t>Lorenzo Colitti, Dave Thaler, Dan Wing, Alberto Garcia-Martinez, Reinaldo Penno, Ranjana Rao,
		Lars Eggert, Senthil Sivakumar, Zhen Cao, Xiangsong Cui, Mohamed Boucadair,
		Dong Zhang, Bryan Ford, Kentaro Ebisawa, Charles Perkins, Magnus Westerlund, Ed Jankiewicz, David Harrington, Peter McCann, Julien Laganier, Pekka Savola,
		and Joao Damas reviewed the document and 
		provided useful comments to improve it.</t>
		
	<t>The content of the document was improved thanks to discussions with Christian Huitema, Fred Baker, and Jari Arkko.</t>
	
     <t>Marcelo Bagnulo and Iljitsch van Beijnum are partly funded by Trilogy, 
	a research project supported by the European Commission under its Seventh 
	Framework Program.</t>
   </section>

   <section title="ANNEX: Changes from RFC6146 to RFC6146-bis-00/01/02/03">
       <t>Section to be removed before publication.</t>
       <t><list style="symbols">
           <t>This version basically resolved 2 erratas (4756 and 8416).</t>
           <t>Updated references.</t>
           <t>Original authors moved to a Contributors section, to avoid issues in auth-48.</t>
           <t>Added implementation status section.</t>
           <t>Added IANA Considerations section.</t>
       </list></t>
   </section>
   
 </middle>

 <back>
   <references title="Normative References">
     <?rfc include="reference.RFC.2119"?>
     <?rfc include="reference.RFC.4787"?>
     <?rfc include="reference.RFC.5382"?>
     <?rfc include="reference.RFC.5508"?>
     <?rfc include="reference.RFC.7915"?>
     <?rfc include="reference.RFC.6052"?>
	 <?rfc include="reference.RFC.4443"?>
     <?rfc include="reference.RFC.6410" ?>
     <?rfc include="reference.RFC.6146"?>
   </references>

   <references title="Informative References">
	 <?rfc include="reference.RFC.5389"?>
     <?rfc include="reference.RFC.6147"?>
     <?rfc include="reference.RFC.0793"?>
     <?rfc include='reference.RFC.1858'?>
     <?rfc include='reference.RFC.3128'?>
     <?rfc include='reference.RFC.3022'?>
     <?rfc include='reference.RFC.5245'?>
	 <?rfc include='reference.RFC.4963'?>
     <?rfc include='reference.RFC.6144'?>
     <?rfc include='reference.RFC.3948'?>
     <?rfc include="reference.RFC.7942" ?>
   </references>

 </back>
</rfc>
