| Internet-Draft | draft-han-pce-path-computation-fg-transp | March 2026 |
| Han, et al. | Expires 2 September 2026 | [Page] |
This document focuses on the requirements for path computation and control of the fine-granularity transport network. It provides the general context of the use cases of path computation and the considerations on the requirements of PCE extension in such fine-granularity transport network.¶
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.¶
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.¶
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."¶
This Internet-Draft will expire on 2 September 2026.¶
Copyright (c) 2026 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved.¶
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Revised BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Revised BSD License.¶
With the proposal of new service demand, the technology of the transport network is constantly developing. TDM based Optical Transport Network (OTN) and Metro Transport Network (MTN) technologies are both moving towards fine-grain hard slices. The vertical industries and dedicated line services have higher requirements on isolation, security and reliability but with smaller bandwidth. Fine-grain TDM technology can provide the flexible N*10Mbps bandwidth for these connections.¶
ITU-T has a series of recommendations for fgOTN (fine grain OTN ) and fgMTN (fine grain MTN). The fgOTN overview is defined in [ITU-T_G.709.20], fgOTN layer architecture is defined in [ITU-T_G.872], fgOTN Interface and server adaptation is defined in [ITU-T_G.709], fgOTN equipment is defined in [ITU-T_G.798], fgOTN synchronization is defined in [ITU-T_G.8251], fgOTN management requirementsis defined in [ITU-T_G.874] and protocol-neutral information model is defined in [ITU-T_G.875]. The fgMTN overview is defined in[ITU-T_G.8312.20], fgMTN layer architecture is defined in [ITU-T_G.8310], fgMTN interface is defined in [ITU-T_G.8312], fgMTN equipment is defined in [ITU-T_G.8321], fgMTN synchronization is defined in [ITU-T_G.mtn-sync], and management requirement and information model is defined in [ITU-T_G.8350]. Both the fgOTN and fgMTN protection are defined in [ITU-T_G.808.4].¶
The new fine-grain transport technology will significantly increase the number of path connections in the network compared to the traditional connections based on optical wavelength or ODUk with larger bandwidth. For the future massive fine-grain channel connections, how to effectively perform end-to-end path computation and control will be an important technical topic.¶
The architecture of a Path Computation Element (PCE)-based model has been presented in [RFC4655]. It discusses PCE-based implementations including composite, external, and multiple PCE path computation. [RFC8779]addresses the extensions required for GMPLS applications and routing requests, for example, for Optical Transport Networks (OTNs) and Wavelength Switched Optical Networks (WSONs). Due to the new features of fine-grain technology, PCE may need to be extended.¶
This document focuses on the requirements for path computation and control of the fine-grain transport network. Section 6 provides the general context of the use cases of path computation. Section 7 provides the considerations on the requirements of PCE extension in such fine-grain transport network.¶
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all capitals, as shown here.¶
Domain:¶
A domain, as defined in [RFC4655], is "any collection of network elements within a common sphere of address management or path computation responsibility". Specifically, within this document, we mean a part of an operator's network under common management (i.e., under shared operational management using the same instances of a tool and the same policies). Network elements are often grouped into domains based on technologies, vendor profiles, or geographic proximity.¶
FG:¶
Fine Grain¶
MTN:¶
Metro Transport Network¶
OTN:¶
Optical Transport Network¶
MTN(Metro Transport Network) [ITU-T_G.8310] is a new generation of transport network technology system defined by ITU-T. MTN integrates packet and TDM technologies, enabling compatibility with Ethernet protocol stacks while meeting differentiated requirements of the 6G era, such as hard isolation, low latency, and high reliability, thus further enhancing the bearer capability of 5G networks.¶
From the bottom up, MTN network is composed of three network layers:¶
MTN section layer, MTN path layer and fgMTN path layer.¶
Client Signal (Ethernet MAC frame or Constant Bitrate)
|
+------------------------+
| fgMTN path layer |
| | |
| MTN path layer |
| | |
| MTN section layer |
+------------------------+
As shown in Figure 1, the fgMTN technology [ITU-T_G.8312.20]incorporates fine-grained slicing into the MTN architecture, providing a low-cost, refined, hard-isolated, and fine-grained bearer channels. The fgMTN technology further refines the granularity of hard slicing from 5 Gbit/s to 10 Mbit/s, meeting the differentiated service bearer requirements of vertical industry applications and private line services, such as small bandwidth, high isolation, and high security.¶
Compared to traditional optical networks, fine-grain transport networks require more quantity, faster, and more flexible path set-up and removing capabilities. The path computation architecture should be reliable, scalable and efficient to facilitate the configuration of a large amount of fine-granularity channel connections.¶
+-----------------------+ +------------------------+
| Domain A | | Domain B |
+-+-+ +--+ +--+ ++-+ +-++ +--+ +--+ +-+-+
--->|PE1+---+P1+----+P2+---->+P4|------>|P5+----+P6+----+P7+---->+PE2|--->
+-+-+ +--+ +--+ ++-+ +-++ +--+ +--+ +-+-+
| | | |
+-----------------------+ +------------------------+
^ ^
| |
+-----------------E2E fine-grain LSP-------------------------+
o The number of fine-grain TDM channels will significantly increase:¶
FgOTN and fgMTN support 10Mbit/s level tributary slots granularity. One ODU2 channel can support up to 952 fgOTN connections. One 5Gbps MTN channel can support up to 480 fgMTN connections. For transport devices with a switching capacity of several Tbps, they can support fine-grain channel connections of tens of thousands or even tens of thousands. Therefore, for the network, the number of connections throughout the entire network will significantly increase.¶
o According to service requirements, fine-grain paths may change frequently and dynamically:¶
One fine-grain channel can carry and correspond to a certain CBR or Ethernet service, rather than serving as a large optical channel. When the services appear or end, or its bandwidth changes, or the destination address changes, they will cause changes in fine-grain channels. Therefore, compared to serving as an optical bandwidth channel for the routers, the fine-granularity channels serve directly as service channels, which are more likely to change.¶
To address the massive fine-grain path computation issues, it is necessary to combine centralized control systems and distributed control protocols. On the one hand, a centralized control system is used to calculate the global optimal routing and develop resource scheduling strategies. On the other hand, distributed control protocols between devices are used to perform operations such as cross connection configuration and time slot occupation assignment.¶
The applications of fine-grain path computation and related capabilities at least include:¶
Fine-grain path set-up:¶
The control system calculates service routing in a centralized way and sends messages to the source node. Then, the connection is established between devices through connection control signaling. The end-to-end fine-grain connections may cross one or more domains.¶
Fine-grain resource management:¶
The topology and resource information of fine-grain devices and slots need to be collected and reported, so that the centralized system can calculate new routes based on this information and allocate slot resources for the new connections.¶
Fine-grain path update:¶
During the connection, fine-grain channels can undergo hitless bandwidth adjustment. When channel bandwidth increases or decreases, time slots need to be added or removed. It is needed to control and update the existing path parameter.¶
Fine-grain path removal:¶
When the service no longer needs this connection, it is necessary to remove this fine-grain channel and release the corresponding resources.¶
FgMTN uses the management and control system to perform centralized path computation. The functions of topology and resource collection can use PCEP-LS [I-D.ietf-pce-pcep-ls] to enable the collection of link-state and TE information from MTN networks and sharing with PCE by extending a new LS Report message. Therefore, the PCEP-LS can be extended to support the reporting of fgMTN topology resources.¶
The path calculation request/reply message from the PCC or the PCE must contain the information specifying appropriate fine-grain channel attributes, including the fine-grain switching capability/type, the fine-grain server layer type, the fine-grain time slots, the fine-grain client ID, end-to-End fine-granularity path protection type, etc.¶
Based on the above analysis, the specific PCEP and its link status extensions are provided by [I-D.ietf-pce-pcep-ls] and [I-D.ietf-pce-pcep-ls].¶
TBD¶
TBD¶
TBD¶