Internet-Draft FETCH-ONCE May 2026
Vijayvargiya Expires 2 November 2026 [Page]
Workgroup:
HTTP
Internet-Draft:
draft-vijayvargiya-http-fetch-once-00
Published:
Intended Status:
Standards Track
Expires:
Author:
K. Vijayvargiya
Individual Contributor

The HTTP FETCH-ONCE Method

Abstract

This document defines the HTTP FETCH-ONCE method. It allows a client to retrieve a resource and ensures that the resource is immediately deleted or invalidated after retrieval.

Status of This Memo

This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.

Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.

Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

This Internet-Draft will expire on 2 November 2026.

Table of Contents

1. Introduction

Applications often require one-time access to sensitive data such as tokens or temporary links. Existing HTTP methods require multiple requests. FETCH-ONCE provides a single atomic operation that retrieves and invalidates a resource in one step.

2. Method Definition

The FETCH-ONCE method retrieves the target resource and then deletes or invalidates it immediately after access. The server MUST ensure that the operation is atomic so that only one client can successfully retrieve any given resource.

3. Security Considerations

Servers MUST ensure atomic behavior to prevent multiple retrievals. Implementations should consider race conditions and ensure that concurrent FETCH-ONCE requests for the same resource result in only one successful retrieval.

4. IANA Considerations

This document requests that IANA register the FETCH-ONCE method in the "HTTP Method Registry" maintained at <https://www.iana.org/assignments/http-methods>.

5. Normative References

[RFC9110]
Fielding, R., Ed., Nottingham, M., Ed., and J. Reschke, Ed., "HTTP Semantics", STD 97, RFC 9110, DOI 10.17487/RFC9110, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9110>.
[RFC2119]
Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>.
[RFC8174]
Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC 2119 Key Words", BCP 14, RFC 8174, DOI 10.17487/RFC8174, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8174>.

Author's Address

Ketan Vijayvargiya
Individual Contributor