From xemacs-m  Wed Jul  2 22:53:31 1997
Received: from altair.xemacs.org (steve@xemacs.miranova.com [206.190.83.19])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id WAA13391
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Wed, 2 Jul 1997 22:53:27 -0500 (CDT)
Received: (from steve@localhost)
	by altair.xemacs.org (8.8.6/8.8.6) id UAA06561;
	Wed, 2 Jul 1997 20:54:41 -0700
Mail-Copies-To: never
To: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
Subject: Re: Repeatable crash with union type
References: <kigk9jfu3w6.fsf@jagor.srce.hr> <199707030128.SAA01713@xemacs.eng.sun.com>
X-Url: http://www.miranova.com/%7Esteve/
X-Face: #!T9!#9s-3o8)*uHlX{Ug[xW7E7Wr!*L46-OxqMu\xz23v|R9q}lH?cRS{rCNe^'[`^sr5"
 f8*@r4ipO6Jl!:Ccq<xoV[Qz2u8<8-+Vwf2gzJ44lf_/y9OaQ`@#Q65{U4/TC)i2`~/M&QI$X>p:9I
 OSS'2{-)-4wBnVeg0S\O4Al@)uC[pD|+
X-Attribution: sb
From: Steven L Baur <steve@xemacs.org>
In-Reply-To: Martin Buchholz's message of "Wed, 2 Jul 1997 18:28:42 -0700"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.108)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Date: 02 Jul 1997 20:54:40 -0700
Message-ID: <m2wwn823jz.fsf@altair.xemacs.org>
Lines: 17
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.61/XEmacs 20.3(beta11) - "Stockholm"

Martin Buchholz <mrb@Eng.Sun.COM> writes:

> I've added this to configure:

> if test "GCC $with_mule $use_union_type" = "yes yes yes"; then
>   echo "  WARNING: ---------------------------------------------------------"
>   echo "  WARNING: gcc is known to produce buggy code when --with-union-type"
>   echo "  WARNING: and --with-mule are enabled.  XEmacs may crash."
>   echo "  WARNING: ---------------------------------------------------------"
> fi

What platforms does it produce bad code on?  It sure looks like it's
O.K. on Intel Linux.  I've been working this way
(Gcc+Optimization+Mule+Lisp Union Type) for many months now.
-- 
steve@calag.com baur
Unsolicited commercial e-mail will be billed at $250/message.

