From xemacs-m  Tue Jul  8 16:00:08 1997
Received: from jagor.srce.hr (hniksic@jagor.srce.hr [161.53.2.130])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id QAA25386
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Tue, 8 Jul 1997 16:00:07 -0500 (CDT)
Received: (from hniksic@localhost)
	by jagor.srce.hr (8.8.6/8.8.6) id XAA26514;
	Tue, 8 Jul 1997 23:00:01 +0200 (MET DST)
To: XEmacs Developers <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Smallpox in Gnus
References: <kig90zha33g.fsf@jagor.srce.hr>             <m2oh8djn60.fsf@altair.xemacs.org> <199707082044.QAA17388@black-ice.cc.vt.edu>
X-Attribution: Hrv
X-Face: Mie8:rOV<\c/~z{s.X4A{!?vY7{drJ([U]0O=W/<W*SMo/Mv:58:*_y~ki>xDi&N7XG
        KV^$k0m3Oe/)'e%3=$PCR&3ITUXH,cK>]bci&<qQ>Ff%x_>1`T(+M2Gg/fgndU%k*ft
        [(7._6e0n-V%|%'[c|q:;}td$#INd+;?!-V=c8Pqf}3J
From: Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic@srce.hr>
Date: 08 Jul 1997 23:00:01 +0200
In-Reply-To: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu's message of "Tue, 08 Jul 1997 16:44:17 -0400"
Message-ID: <kigg1tpgsz2.fsf@jagor.srce.hr>
Lines: 18
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.59/XEmacs 20.3(beta11) - "Stockholm"

Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu writes:

> On 08 Jul 1997 13:37:11 PDT, you said:
> > This is terrible behavior which is retained for compatibility with old
> > `.elc' files which expected these semantics.
> 
> OK.. time for a straw-man proposal.  Assuming we were willing to say
> "<expletive> the old .elc's",  what change(s) would everybody like to
> see put into the .elc format?  If we're gonna break it, let's break it
> ONCE and be done with it.

Is there a good reason to break it?  I certainly don't see one.

-- 
Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic@srce.hr> | Student at FER Zagreb, Croatia
--------------------------------+--------------------------------
`VI' - An editor used by those heretics that don't subscribe to
       the Emacs religion.

