From xemacs-m  Wed Jul 30 14:57:45 1997
Received: from newman.aventail.com (root@newman.aventail.com [199.238.236.1])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id OAA10210
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Wed, 30 Jul 1997 14:57:42 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from kramer.in.aventail.com (wmperry@kramer.in.aventail.com [192.168.1.12])
	by newman.aventail.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id MAA17625
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Wed, 30 Jul 1997 12:57:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from wmperry@localhost)
	by kramer.in.aventail.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) id MAA32267;
	Wed, 30 Jul 1997 12:57:12 -0700
To: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] XEmacs and WindowMaker...
References: <199707251530.IAA09865@kramer.in.aventail.com> <m34t9iasyd.fsf@indie.fga-intern.de> <86sox0hdj3.fsf@kramer.in.aventail.com> <m3lo2sz0kg.fsf@indie.fga-intern.de> <m2pvs46ltb.fsf@altair.xemacs.org>
Errors-to: wmperry@aventail.com
Reply-to: wmperry@aventail.com
X-Face: O~Rn;(l][/-o1sALg4A@xpE:9-"'IR[%;,,!m7</SYF`{vYQ(&RI1&EiH[FvT;J}@f!4kfz
 x_!Y#=y{Uuj9GvUi=cPuajQ(Z42R[wE@{G,sn$qGr5g/wnb*"*ktI+,CD}1Z'wxrM2ag-r0p5I6\nA
 [WJopW_J.WY;
From: wmperry@aventail.com (William M. Perry)
Date: 29 Jul 1997 13:23:31 -0700
In-Reply-To: SL Baur's message of "27 Jul 1997 17:51:28 -0700"
Message-ID: <863eoxtxoc.fsf@wmperry.oz.net>
Lines: 20
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.59/Emacs 19.34

SL Baur <steve@xemacs.org> writes:

> Oliver Graf <ograf@fga.de> writes:
> 
> > wmperry@aventail.com (William M. Perry) writes:
> 
> >> That's what I thought, which is why I didn't think it should be #ifdef
> >> HAVE_WINDOWMAKER...
> 
> > For me it also alright to do it without any conditionals. But just in
> > the case that it woes with some system we could keep the conditionals
> > until everyone thinks it's ok.
> 
> If that's the case, it should be defaulted to on.  It's doubtful
> there's going to be a whole lot of testing if enabling it requires use 
> of a new configure option.

  Yes please. :)

-bp

