From xemacs-m  Fri Aug  1 01:50:00 1997
Received: from Flux.tokai.jaeri.go.jp (root@flux.tokai.jaeri.go.jp [133.53.13.28])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id BAA23346;
	Fri, 1 Aug 1997 01:49:58 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by Flux.tokai.jaeri.go.jp (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id PAA03466;
	Fri, 1 Aug 1997 15:49:58 +0900
To: steve@xemacs.org
Cc: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
Cc: furutaka@Flux.tokai.jaeri.go.jp
Subject: Re: [Failure] XEmacs 20.3-beta16 "Budapest" (config.values)
In-Reply-To: Your message of "31 Jul 1997 23:34:24 -0700"
	<m2k9i676of.fsf@altair.xemacs.org>
References: <m2k9i676of.fsf@altair.xemacs.org>
X-Mailer: Mew version 1.87 on XEmacs 20.3 (beta16) - "Budapest"
X-Pgp-Fingerprint: 14 2B DA A1 31 70 7E A6  18 24 7E 03 EB 4D B3 64
X-Pgp-Public-Key: mailto:pgp-public-keys@icat.or.jp / Subject: GET 0x4734C8B5
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <19970801154957A.furutaka@Flux.tokai.jaeri.go.jp>
Date: Fri, 01 Aug 1997 15:49:57 +0900
From: Kazuyoshi Furutaka <furutaka@Flux.tokai.jaeri.go.jp>
X-Dispatcher: imput version 970728
Lines: 16

In <m2k9i676of.fsf@altair.xemacs.org>
at 31 Jul 1997 23:34:24 -0700
SL Baur <steve@xemacs.org> wrote
on "Re: [Failure] XEmacs 20.3-beta16 "Budapest" (config.values)"...

> Did you rerun configure with `./config.status --recheck' after
> patching?

No.

Do I have to do this procedure w/ fresh four tarballs?

Kazuyoshi
-----
Kazuyoshi Furutaka
furutaka@Flux.tokai.jaeri.go.jp

