From xemacs-m  Thu Jan  9 02:39:03 1997
Received: from draco.jsk.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp (draco.jsk.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp [133.11.96.217])
          by xemacs.cs.uiuc.edu (8.8.4/8.8.4) with SMTP
	  id CAA15774 for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Thu, 9 Jan 1997 02:39:02 -0600 (CST)
Received: from localhost (hajime@localhost) by draco.jsk.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp (8.6.12+2.5Wb7/3.4Wbeta6-95083023) with SMTP id RAA05824; Thu, 9 Jan 1997 17:37:29 +0900
From: Hajime Saitou <hajime@jsk.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp>
Message-Id: <199701090837.RAA05824@draco.jsk.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp>
X-Authentication-Warning: draco.jsk.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp: Host localhost didn't use HELO protocol
To: Soren Dayton <csdayton@cs.uchicago.edu>
CC: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
Subject: Re: a bad test for XFree86 in configure 
In-reply-to: Your message of "08 Jan 97 18:48:14 CST."
             <xcdhgkroer5.fsf@gargoyle164.cs.uchicago.edu> 
Date: Thu, 09 Jan 97 17:37:28 +0900


> I have not actually tried the patch, but I have a terribly clever idea:
> look for xf86config.  Some other thoughts:
> 
> 1.  On the only XFree86 machine that I have acccess to (3.1.2 and
>     FreeBSd 2.1.0) there is a libExExt with this from an nm(1):

I'm afraid there seems to be no libExExt in XFree86 3.2. But there are
libXxf86dga.a libXxf86misc.a libXxf86vm.a.

> XF86VMode.o:
> 000001d0 T _XF86VidModeGetModeLine
> 00000750 T _XF86VidModeGetMonitor
> 00000670 T _XF86VidModeGetSaver
> 00000520 T _XF86VidModeLockModeSwitch
> 00000340 T _XF86VidModeModModeLine
> 000000b0 T _XF86VidModeQueryExtension
> 00000100 T _XF86VidModeQueryVersion
> 000005c0 T _XF86VidModeSetSaver
> 00000480 T _XF86VidModeSwitchMode
> 
> or do some trick with xmkmf?

You could use the ServerVendor function *if* the person who is compiling 
is using X at the time. But I suppose it is just a too big an "if".

Hajime Saito

