From xemacs-m  Thu Jan  9 03:15:19 1997
Received: from red.parallax.co.uk (root@red.parallax.co.uk [194.159.4.1])
          by xemacs.cs.uiuc.edu (8.8.4/8.8.4) with SMTP
	  id DAA16009 for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Thu, 9 Jan 1997 03:15:17 -0600 (CST)
Received: from dumbo.parallax.co.uk (dumbo.parallax.co.uk [172.16.1.12]) by red.parallax.co.uk (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id JAA08283; Thu, 9 Jan 1997 09:15:09 GMT
Received: from wrath.parallax.co.uk (wrath.parallax.co.uk [192.168.1.2]) by dumbo.parallax.co.uk (8.7.1/8.7.1) with SMTP id JAA01332; Thu, 9 Jan 1997 09:17:48 GMT
Received: by wrath.parallax.co.uk (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4)
	id JAA09559; Thu, 9 Jan 1997 09:23:36 GMT
Date: Thu, 9 Jan 1997 09:23:36 GMT
From: andyp@parallax.co.uk (Andy Piper)
Message-Id: <199701090923.JAA09559@wrath.parallax.co.uk>
To: turner@lanl.gov
Subject: Re: 20.0-b34: XIM problems on Irix 6.3
Cc: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
X-Sun-Charset: US-ASCII

> Martin Buchholz writes:
> 
>  > Brand new SGI's simply can't be this broken.
> 
> You haven't worked much with SGI's, have you?
> 
> (I'm sorry.  I shouldn't have said that... doesn't belong on this
> list anyway, etc. etc... just can't help it...)

Did anyone read that "leaked" internal memo on the net about 3 years ago 
regarding IRIX running on indy's ( I think ). It made for quite amusing
reading, I'd be interested if anyone still has a copy. I think the gist 
of it was that IRIX 5 (?) in its default configuration was too big to fit 
in the default memory configuration of the indy's.

andy

