From xemacs-m  Tue Aug 19 19:56:22 1997
Received: from news.smart.net (jmiller@max1p95.smart.net [206.97.127.95])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id TAA16149
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Tue, 19 Aug 1997 19:56:20 -0500 (CDT)
Received: (from jmiller@localhost)
          by news.smart.net (8.8.4/8.8.4)
	  id UAA24670; Tue, 19 Aug 1997 20:58:12 -0400
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 1997 20:58:12 -0400
Message-Id: <199708200058.UAA24670@news.smart.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Jeff Miller <jmiller@smart.net>
To: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
Subject: Re: [repost] regex patches: minimal matching, etc.
In-Reply-To: <m2vi12bi91.fsf@altair.xemacs.org>
References: <r4u3gn5oh1.fsf@cognex.com>
	<m2vi12bi91.fsf@altair.xemacs.org>
X-Mailer: VM 6.33 under 20.3 "Bratislava" XEmacs  Lucid (beta18)
Reply-to: jmiller@smart.net
X-Face: &vGrMZ?Q&W5~yiCR_#hat=$tgJrK`J=2$se?0Nu9I3G|I<2-\:82zx>kz=l8(yw)G1i&0"D
 <nv_e$^;,ftG6@Hn"did"G5i=X_-Z3Y

>>>>> "sb" == SL Baur <steve@xemacs.org> writes:

sb> Please test this patch out.  It is my intention to apply it if there
sb> are no serious objections.

ok, the first two hunks for regex.c failed, but I think I got the right
stuff in place.  Compiled and no crashes.

Should I expect any improvements or is this the type of patch that just
makes new features availble to coders?

