From xemacs-m  Thu Sep  4 10:47:33 1997
Received: from relay7.UU.NET (relay7.UU.NET [192.48.96.17])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id KAA05392
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Thu, 4 Sep 1997 10:47:27 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from crystal.WonderWorks.COM by relay7.UU.NET with ESMTP 
	(peer crosschecked as: crystal.WonderWorks.com [192.203.206.1])
	id QQdfoh03170; Thu, 4 Sep 1997 11:47:26 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by crystal.WonderWorks.COM 
	id QQdfoh29197; Thu, 4 Sep 1997 11:47:22 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Thu, 4 Sep 1997 11:47:22 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <QQdfoh29197.199709041547@crystal.WonderWorks.COM>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Kyle Jones <kyle_jones@wonderworks.com>
To: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
Subject: Re: first match-data ever ...
In-Reply-To: <qyjlo1dlarq.fsf@metheny.enst.fr>
References: <qyjlo1dlarq.fsf@metheny.enst.fr>
X-Mailer: VM 6.34 under 19.16 XEmacs Lucid (beta90)
X-Face: /cA45WHG7jWq>(O3&Z57Y<"WsX5ddc,4c#w0F*zrV#=M
        0@~@,s;b,aMtR5Sqs"+nU.z^CSFQ9t`z2>W,S,]:[+2^
        Nbf6v4g>!&,7R4Ot4Wg{&tm=WX7P["9%a)_da48-^tGy
        ,qz]Z,Zz\{E.,]'EO+F)@$KtF&V

Didier Verna writes:
 > 
 > > I'm not going to touch C code 
 > 
 > 	Well, finally, I did .... but I'd still like opinions on what
 > the correct behavior of match-data should be. This patch seems to
 > work ... Apply at your own risk ... distributed WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY ...

Acceptable.  It matches what (store-match-data nil) does.

