From xemacs-m  Fri Sep  5 01:59:39 1997
Received: from kurims.kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp (kurims.kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp [130.54.16.1])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id BAA11559
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Fri, 5 Sep 1997 01:59:36 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from orion.kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp (orion.kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp [130.54.16.5]) by kurims.kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp (8.8.5/3.4W2) with SMTP id PAA16858; Fri, 5 Sep 1997 15:59:11 +0900 (JST)
Received: (from petersen@localhost) by orion.kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp (SMI-8.6/3.5Wbeta) id PAA10127; Fri, 5 Sep 1997 15:59:10 +0900
To: bwarsaw@CNRI.Reston.Va.US (Barry A. Warsaw)
Cc: XEmacs Beta List <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>
Subject: Re: EFS to a Win95 box using Hummingbird Ftpd?
References: <199709050345.XAA06757@anthem.CNRI.Reston.Va.US>
X-Emacs: 20.3 "Kyiv" XEmacs  Lucid (beta19) with mule
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI MIME-Edit 0.86 "Naka-Tsurugi")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
From: Jens-Ulrik Holger Petersen <petersen@kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp>
Date: 05 Sep 1997 15:59:10 +0900
In-Reply-To: "Barry A. Warsaw"'s message of "Thu, 4 Sep 1997 23:45:08 -0400"
Message-ID: <lbvi0gutz5.fsf@orion.kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp>
Lines: 30
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.65 + SEMI patch (r2.1)/XEmacs 20.3(beta19) - "Kyiv"

>>>>> "BAW" == Barry A Warsaw <bwarsaw@CNRI.Reston.Va.US> writes:

    BAW> Hummingbird's Exceed (Win95/NT X server) product comes with an ftpd
    BAW> that seems to work well, however efs can't quite grok the output
    BAW> lines.  Seems that the -l listing gives lines that look like:

    BAW> -rwx------ 1  staff      47797 Jun 10 13:49 BOOTLOG.TXT
    BAW> -rwx------ 1  staff      92870 Jul 11  1995 COMMAND.COM

    BAW> I get the following error message:

    BAW> Line has too few fields: -rwx------ 1  staff      47797 Jun 10 13:49 BOOTLOG.TXT

    BAW> This comes from prim/sort.el because efs is telling sort that there
    BAW> are 9 fields, when clearly there are only 8.

    BAW> It seems like it should be possible to teach efs/dired to understand
    BAW> these lines, but I'm not quite One with efs-pc.el.  Does anybody have
    BAW> a patch?  If not, I'll work one up, but it'll be a week or so...

    BAW> Thanks.

Sorry, I don't know, but I know someone who may: try asking on the efs 
list:

	efs-help@cuckoo.hpl.hp.com

I think that is your best bet.

Jens

