From xemacs-m  Mon Sep 22 21:05:19 1997
Received: from relay4.UU.NET (relay4.UU.NET [192.48.96.14])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id VAA14789
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Mon, 22 Sep 1997 21:05:18 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from crystal.WonderWorks.COM by relay4.UU.NET with ESMTP 
	(peer crosschecked as: crystal.WonderWorks.com [192.203.206.1])
	id QQdiei20058; Mon, 22 Sep 1997 22:05:38 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by crystal.WonderWorks.COM 
	id QQdiei15095; Mon, 22 Sep 1997 22:05:18 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 1997 22:05:18 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <QQdiei15095.199709230205@crystal.WonderWorks.COM>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Kyle Jones <kyle_jones@wonderworks.com>
To: XEmacs Developers <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>
Subject: Re: dlmalloc
In-Reply-To: <QQdidy13097.199709222339@crystal.WonderWorks.COM>
References: <m27mcame88.fsf@altair.xemacs.org>
	<kig7mc91r56.fsf@jagor.srce.hr>
	<87wwk9yz85.fsf_-_@bittersweet.inetarena.com>
	<kigzpp5dvzj.fsf@jagor.srce.hr>
	<QQdidy13097.199709222339@crystal.WonderWorks.COM>
X-Mailer: VM 6.34 under 20.3 "Sarajevo" XEmacs  Lucid (beta23)
X-Face: /cA45WHG7jWq>(O3&Z57Y<"WsX5ddc,4c#w0F*zrV#=M
        0@~@,s;b,aMtR5Sqs"+nU.z^CSFQ9t`z2>W,S,]:[+2^
        Nbf6v4g>!&,7R4Ot4Wg{&tm=WX7P["9%a)_da48-^tGy
        ,qz]Z,Zz\{E.,]'EO+F)@$KtF&V

Kyle Jones writes regarding the small-list bench test:
 > Emacs 19.34	5.80
 > XEmacs 20.3	6.10
 > Emacs 20.1	7.76
 > 

I put #undef DEBUG_XEMACS in src/alloc.c and rebuilt beta23.  The 
result:

XEmacs 20.3	5.70

So from where I sit, we're wasting our Wheaties trying to improve 
this, at least for now.

