From xemacs-m  Wed Sep 24 17:01:02 1997
Received: from jagor.srce.hr (hniksic@jagor.srce.hr [161.53.2.130])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id QAA06480
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Wed, 24 Sep 1997 16:57:56 -0500 (CDT)
Received: (from hniksic@localhost)
	by jagor.srce.hr (8.8.7/8.8.6) id XAA09851;
	Wed, 24 Sep 1997 23:52:28 +0200 (MET DST)
To: XEmacs Developers <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>
Subject: Re: Slow glyphs
References: <kigg1quwmua.fsf@jagor.srce.hr> <86oh5i5u6h.fsf@kramer.in.aventail.com>
X-Attribution: Hrvoje
X-Face: Mie8:rOV<\c/~z{s.X4A{!?vY7{drJ([U]0O=W/<W*SMo/Mv:58:*_y~ki>xDi&N7XG
        KV^$k0m3Oe/)'e%3=$PCR&3ITUXH,cK>]bci&<qQ>Ff%x_>1`T(+M2Gg/fgndU%k*ft
        [(7._6e0n-V%|%'[c|q:;}td$#INd+;?!-V=c8Pqf}3J
From: Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic@srce.hr>
Date: 24 Sep 1997 23:52:27 +0200
In-Reply-To: wmperry@aventail.com's message of "24 Sep 1997 13:32:54 -0700"
Message-ID: <kighgbaqt0k.fsf@jagor.srce.hr>
Lines: 16
X-Mailer: Quassia Gnus v0.10/XEmacs 20.3(beta23) - "Sarajevo"

wmperry@aventail.com (William M. Perry) writes:

> I don't think the XImage is actually created until the glyph is shown for 
> the first time.

That makes sense.  However, I was baffled because I really had a bunch 
of *equal* glyphs, and the thing was still slow.  But then I realized
that the glyphs were equal, but not `eq'.

I have now implemented glyph caching, so customize with glyphs is now
normally fast.

-- 
Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic@srce.hr> | Student at FER Zagreb, Croatia
--------------------------------+--------------------------------
Idle RAM is the Devil's playground.

