From xemacs-m  Wed Jan 22 10:17:02 1997
Received: from steadfast.teradyne.com (steadfast.teradyne.com [131.101.1.200])
          by xemacs.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP
	  id KAA07785 for <XEmacs-Beta@xemacs.org>; Wed, 22 Jan 1997 10:17:01 -0600 (CST)
Received: from kiki.icd.teradyne.com (kiki.icd.teradyne.com [131.101.1.30]) by steadfast.teradyne.com (8.7.1/8.7.1) with ESMTP id LAA02106 for <XEmacs-Beta@xemacs.org>; Wed, 22 Jan 1997 11:20:03 -0500 (EST)
Received: from spacely.icd.teradyne.com (spacely.icd.teradyne.com [131.101.10.9]) by kiki.icd.teradyne.com (8.7.1/8.7.1) with SMTP id LAA12058 for <XEmacs-Beta@xemacs.org>; Wed, 22 Jan 1997 11:14:21 -0500 (EST)
Received: from spacely by spacely.icd.teradyne.com (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4)
	id LAA01490; Wed, 22 Jan 1997 11:16:44 -0500
Message-Id: <199701221616.LAA01490@spacely.icd.teradyne.com>
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0beta 12/23/96
To: XEmacs-Beta@xemacs.org
Subject: Re: Copyright assignment 
In-reply-to: nuspl's message of Wed, 22 Jan 1997 10:39:46 -0500.
	     <199701221539.KAA13012@nvwls.cc.purdue.edu> 
reply-to: acs@acm.org
X-Attribution: Vin
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 1997 11:16:43 -0500
From: Vinnie Shelton  <shelton@icd.teradyne.com>


nuspl@nvwls.cc.purdue.edu said:
> Since Kyle wants to have have his packages pulled from the
> distribution,
Did I miss something here?

> maybe we should bundle the unbundled packages into a
> xemacs-non-fsf.tar.gz package that will unpack into the appropriate
> place within the hierarchy. 
Although I find this conceptually appealing, would we expect the base 
package to build both with and without this package?  I think that the 
autoloads from non-fsf will be a pain.

--vin

