From xemacs-m  Thu Jan 23 11:03:08 1997
Received: from binah.mind.net (erik@zamboni.mind.net [206.151.158.134])
          by xemacs.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP
	  id LAA15680 for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Thu, 23 Jan 1997 11:03:07 -0600 (CST)
Received: (from erik@localhost) by binah.mind.net (8.8.4/8.7.3) id JAA18575; Thu, 23 Jan 1997 09:07:10 -0800
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 1997 09:07:10 -0800
Message-Id: <199701231707.JAA18575@binah.mind.net>
From: The Pope <lazarus@mind.net>
To: Steven L Baur <steve@miranova.com>
Cc: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
Subject: Re: 20.0-b91 Build Failure
In-Reply-To: <m2hgk8z6xp.fsf@altair.xemacs.org>
References: <199701231515.HAA13804@binah.mind.net>
	<m2hgk8z6xp.fsf@altair.xemacs.org>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Steven L. Baur writes:
 > > XEmacs: Pure storage exhausted
 > > make[1]: *** [xemacs] Error 1
 > > make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/erik/src/xemacs-20.0-b90/src'
 > > make: *** [src] Error 2
 > 
 > > What's a good pure space value?
 > 
 > How many bytes is it off?  Didn't it print that out?  Are you dumping
 > any packages beyond the default (like continuing to dump cc-mode or
 > something like that)?

Nope, I'm doing all defaults...it didn't tell me how much it was off.
Is there some other way to tell?  I just switched back to the value
from b90, and it worked fine.

 > > Is it good to get it as small as possible and still functional?
 > 
 > Yes.  The ideal amount of space left over is 0 bytes.

Ah, I shoulda guessed.  :)

Erik Arneson
lazarus@mind.net

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.4, an Emacs/PGP interface

iQCVAwUBMuearkFocS0ibnLxAQEHewP+O+w77dCbk1ZdNt3DMYMjrqlumDWzBwCv
8iioBDI0wCDFPFnaCD87T+5Z37OQbFfPCMlWyaYk753SGcQC5CdoxQLPMQSa9a+j
+yKVnmGpzJPHZNzbAReoEa0d8Xm9FNDAovEV8YNTvT6VDyf8VYVZuJR8o1vj4C0k
qdSR20YSixI=
=jlZ0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

