From xemacs-m  Tue Jan 28 20:52:27 1997
Received: from mykonos.interport.net (ts3port40.port.net [207.38.249.40])
          by xemacs.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP
	  id UAA28797 for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Tue, 28 Jan 1997 20:52:23 -0600 (CST)
Received: (from pez@localhost) by mykonos.interport.net (8.7.4/8.7.3) id VAA02895; Tue, 28 Jan 1997 21:51:49 -0500
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 1997 21:51:49 -0500
Message-Id: <199701290251.VAA02895@mykonos.interport.net>
From: Peter Pezaris <pez@dwwc.com>
To: Kyle Jones <kyle_jones@wonderworks.com>
Cc: XEmacs Beta <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>
Subject: Re: [19.15b90]: Rogue dialog box
In-Reply-To: <QQcakr23178.199701280922@crystal.WonderWorks.COM>
References: <9701280805.AA29140@mail.esrin.esa.it>
	<rvsp3mrz4s.fsf@sdnp5.ucsd.edu>
	<QQcakr23178.199701280922@crystal.WonderWorks.COM>
Reply-To: pez@dwwc.com


    Kyle> See should-use-dialog-box, a variable.

If this variable hasn't been released to the public yet (i.e. it's
new for 20.0) can we *please* change the name of it?

How about use-dialog-box-p or something? Isn't that the standard for
boolean-type variables? Can you imagine if every variable started
"should"?

should-vm-use-menus should-passwd-invert-frame-when-keyboard-grabbed
should-inhibit-startup-message should-fume-auto-position-popup
should-dabbrev-always-check-other-buffers should-highlight-headers-hack-x-face-p
etc.

Just my opinion.

-Pez

