From xemacs-m  Wed Jan 29 11:29:52 1997
Received: from info-sparc1.info.ucl.ac.be (info-sparc1.info.ucl.ac.be [130.104.2.23])
          by xemacs.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP
	  id LAA03378 for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Wed, 29 Jan 1997 11:29:42 -0600 (CST)
Received: from nimitz.info.ucl.ac.be (nimitz.info.ucl.ac.be [130.104.21.70]) by info-sparc1.info.ucl.ac.be (8.7.5/8.7.3(fg/170796)) with ESMTP id SAA17286; Wed, 29 Jan 1997 18:29:56 +0100 (MET)
Received: (from fp@localhost) by nimitz.info.ucl.ac.be (8.7.5/8.7.3) id SAA03170; Wed, 29 Jan 1997 18:29:23 +0100 (MET)
Message-Id: <199701291729.SAA03170@nimitz.info.ucl.ac.be>
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.9 8/22/96
To: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
Cc: wmperry@aventail.com
Subject: Re: Binary kits...who? when? 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 29 Jan 1997 08:58:13 PST."
             <199701291658.IAA04169@newman> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 1997 18:29:22 +0100
From: Frederic Poncin <fp@info.ucl.ac.be>

]> Steven L. Baur writes:

]> >Yup.  Linux is definitely covered except for making RPMs.  I would
]> >prefer to have someone on this list build the RPM to give to RedHat.
]> 
]>   I can do the RPM.  I'll work on a description file later today.
]> 
]> -Bill P.
]> 

Please send the .spec file (or post to the list). I'll check the sparc-linux 
compatibility.

It would be nice if someone could also test it with an Alpha. 

Frederic Poncin -- fp@info.ucl.ac.be

