From xemacs-m  Fri Feb  7 05:01:52 1997
Received: from altair.xemacs.org (steve@xemacs.miranova.com [206.190.83.19])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id FAA02466
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Fri, 7 Feb 1997 05:01:51 -0600 (CST)
Received: (from steve@localhost)
	by altair.xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id DAA23627;
	Fri, 7 Feb 1997 03:12:57 -0800
To: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
Subject: Re: Bytecomp Bug
References: <199702071047.LAA20880@serv-100.dfki.uni-sb.de>
X-Url: http://www.miranova.com/%7Esteve/
Mail-Copies-To: never
X-Face: #!T9!#9s-3o8)*uHlX{Ug[xW7E7Wr!*L46-OxqMu\xz23v|R9q}lH?cRS{rCNe^'[`^sr5"
 f8*@r4ipO6Jl!:Ccq<xoV[Qz2u8<8-+Vwf2gzJ44lf_/y9OaQ`@#Q65{U4/TC)i2`~/M&QI$X>p:9I
 OSS'2{-)-4wBnVeg0S\O4Al@)uC[pD|+
X-Attribution: sb
From: Steven L Baur <steve@miranova.com>
In-Reply-To: Alastair Burt's message of Fri, 7 Feb 1997 11:47:13 +0100 (MET)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.101)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Date: 07 Feb 1997 03:12:56 -0800
Message-ID: <m27mkkrhs7.fsf@altair.xemacs.org>
Lines: 8
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.11/XEmacs 20.0

> This bug makes me wonder: has nobody tried to generate XEmacs 19 code with
> an XEmacs 20 compiler since March 1996?

The bytecompiler in 20.0 wasn't functional in March of '96.  That code
has never been tested, I guess.
-- 
steve@miranova.com baur
Unsolicited commercial e-mail will be billed at $250/message.

