From xemacs-m  Fri Feb  7 09:21:02 1997
Received: from crystal.WonderWorks.COM (crystal.WonderWorks.com [192.203.206.1])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id JAA07944
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Fri, 7 Feb 1997 09:20:58 -0600 (CST)
Received: by crystal.WonderWorks.COM 
	id QQcbwn16863; Fri, 7 Feb 1997 10:20:59 -0500 (EST)
Date: Fri, 7 Feb 1997 10:20:59 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <QQcbwn16863.199702071520@crystal.WonderWorks.COM>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Kyle Jones <kyle_jones@wonderworks.com>
To: XEmacs Beta Mailing List <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>
Subject: Bytecomp Bug
In-Reply-To: <199702071047.LAA20880@serv-100.dfki.uni-sb.de>
References: <199702071047.LAA20880@serv-100.dfki.uni-sb.de>

Alastair Burt writes:
 > [...]
 > This bug makes me wonder: has nobody tried to generate XEmacs 19 code with
 > an XEmacs 20 compiler since March 1996?

I have, but I haven't tried to run it under an non-XEmacs that's
older than 19.29.  So the 'n' would never have been evalled.

