From xemacs-m  Sat Feb  8 21:17:23 1997
Received: from altair.xemacs.org (steve@xemacs.miranova.com [206.190.83.19])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id VAA18099
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Sat, 8 Feb 1997 21:17:22 -0600 (CST)
Received: (from steve@localhost)
	by altair.xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id TAA10043;
	Sat, 8 Feb 1997 19:28:20 -0800
To: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
Subject: Re: wot i need
References: <199702082350.AA191485848@martigny.ai.mit.edu> 	<m27mkiu8ku.fsf@altair.xemacs.org> <QQccbv19986.199702090150@crystal.WonderWorks.COM>
X-Url: http://www.miranova.com/%7Esteve/
Mail-Copies-To: never
X-Face: #!T9!#9s-3o8)*uHlX{Ug[xW7E7Wr!*L46-OxqMu\xz23v|R9q}lH?cRS{rCNe^'[`^sr5"
 f8*@r4ipO6Jl!:Ccq<xoV[Qz2u8<8-+Vwf2gzJ44lf_/y9OaQ`@#Q65{U4/TC)i2`~/M&QI$X>p:9I
 OSS'2{-)-4wBnVeg0S\O4Al@)uC[pD|+
X-Attribution: sb
From: Steven L Baur <steve@miranova.com>
In-Reply-To: Kyle Jones's message of Sat, 8 Feb 1997 20:50:40 -0500 (EST)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.101)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Date: 08 Feb 1997 19:28:17 -0800
Message-ID: <m23ev6u08e.fsf@altair.xemacs.org>
Lines: 48
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.11/XEmacs 20.0

> emacs-19.34		142.5
> xemacs-20.0/MULE	206.3
> xemacs-20.0/Latin-1	204

I have no idea how to explain these results.  I modified the benchmark
to run 5 times so I would have a total running time equivalent to
Kyle's.

Does this confirm that we have a strange architectural problem?

(Tests run on Linux/ELF, Pentium 200)

Function Name    Call Count  Elapsed Time  Average Time
===============  ==========  ============  ============
bench-mark-loop  5           220.16571300  44.033142600 20.0/Latin-1

bench-mark-loop  5           195.09828399  39.019656799 20.0/Mule[I]
bench-mark-loop  5           195.11000600  39.022001200 20.0/Mule[II]

bench-mark-loop  5           188.95106900  37.790213800 Emacs-19.34[I]
bench-mark-loop  5           176.75301000  35.350602000 Emacs-19.34[II]

bench-mark-loop  5           190.42792799  38.085585599 19.14

bench-mark-loop  5           170.98589400  34.197178800 19.13[I]
bench-mark-loop  5           171.94492600  34.388985200 19.13[II]

bench-mark-loop  5           225.24571900  45.049143800 19.15


Sorted by time
Function Name    Call Count  Elapsed Time  Average Time
===============  ==========  ============  ============
bench-mark-loop  5           170.98589400  34.197178800 19.13[I]
bench-mark-loop  5           171.94492600  34.388985200 19.13[II]
bench-mark-loop  5           176.75301000  35.350602000 Emacs-19.34[II]
bench-mark-loop  5           188.95106900  37.790213800 Emacs-19.34[I]
bench-mark-loop  5           190.42792799  38.085585599 19.14
bench-mark-loop  5           195.09828399  39.019656799 20.0/Mule[I]
bench-mark-loop  5           195.11000600  39.022001200 20.0/Mule[II]
bench-mark-loop  5           220.16571300  44.033142600 20.0/Latin-1
bench-mark-loop  5           225.24571900  45.049143800 19.15

I'm going to cons up 19.11 and 19.12 binaries if I can.  Linux/ELF
didn't exist then so I'm not very optimistic.
-- 
steve@miranova.com baur
Unsolicited commercial e-mail will be billed at $250/message.

