From xemacs-m  Sun Feb  9 20:07:33 1997
Received: from ifi.uio.no (0@ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id UAA24867
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Sun, 9 Feb 1997 20:07:32 -0600 (CST)
Received: from proletcult.slip.ifi.uio.no (root@xyplex05.uio.no [129.240.154.25]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) 
	id <DAA14860@ifi.uio.no> ; Mon, 10 Feb 1997 03:07:31 +0100
Received: (from larsi@localhost) by proletcult.slip.ifi.uio.no (8.8.2/8.8.2) id TAA15560; Sun, 9 Feb 1997 19:43:34 +0100
Sender: larsi@proletcult.slip.ifi.uio.no
To: Bill Dubuque <wgd@martigny.ai.mit.edu>
Cc: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
Subject: Re: wot i need
References: <199702091646.AA297756779@martigny.ai.mit.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi@ifi.uio.no>
Date: 09 Feb 1997 19:43:19 +0100
In-Reply-To: Bill Dubuque's message of Sun, 9 Feb 1997 11:46:18 -0500
Message-ID: <m24tfles6w.fsf@proletcult.slip.ifi.uio.no>
Lines: 19
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.12/Emacs 19.34
X-Face: &w!^oO<W.WBH]FsTP:P0f9X6M-ygaADlA_)eF$<UwQzj7:C=Gi<a?/_4$LX^@$Qq7-O&XHp
 lDARi8e8iT<(A$LWAZD*xjk^')/wI5nG;1cNB>~dS|}-P0~ge{$c!h\<y

Bill Dubuque <wgd@martigny.ai.mit.edu> writes:

> : => 29.94636797904968 (XEmacs 20.0 w/Mule)
> : => 24.478706955909729 (Emacs 19.34)
> 
> On my 486/66 Linux, the above takes only 13s in FSF 19.28, and
> 14s for XE 19.11, but 28s for XE 19.12b25.

I have a 486/33, I think, so this taking almost exactly half the time
on your machine seems logical.

But is does mean that your XEmacs 19.12 is twice as slow as my XEmacs
20.0 w/Mule.  :-)

Something is very odd here.

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
  larsi@ifi.uio.no * Lars Ingebrigtsen

