From xemacs-m  Mon Feb 10 17:24:03 1997
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US (CNRI.Reston.VA.US [132.151.1.1])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id RAA16472
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Mon, 10 Feb 1997 17:24:02 -0600 (CST)
Received: from newcnri.cnri.reston.va.us by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa25671;
          10 Feb 97 18:23 EST
Received: from anthem.CNRI.Reston.Va.US by newcnri.CNRI.Reston.Va.US (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4)
	id SAA15066; Mon, 10 Feb 1997 18:23:03 -0500
Received: by anthem.CNRI.Reston.Va.US (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4)
	id SAA08664; Mon, 10 Feb 1997 18:23:02 -0500
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 1997 18:23:02 -0500
Message-Id: <199702102323.SAA08664@anthem.CNRI.Reston.Va.US>
From: "Barry A. Warsaw" <bwarsaw@anthem.cnri.reston.va.us>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: Steven L Baur <steve@miranova.com>
Cc: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
Subject: Re: b93 dead on arrival
References: <199702102255.RAA08625@anthem.CNRI.Reston.Va.US>
	<m2ybcwtfrh.fsf@altair.xemacs.org>
Reply-To: "Barry A. Warsaw" <bwarsaw@CNRI.Reston.VA.US>
X-Attribution: BAW
X-Oblique-Strategy: Do something boring
X-WWW-Homepage: http://www.python.org/~bwarsaw


>>>>> "sb" == Steven L Baur <steve@miranova.com> writes:

    sb> O.K.  You have the same problem Vinnie Shelton reported.  What
    sb> version of Gcc do you guys have?  Barry, could you try
    sb> building with the SparcWorks compiler to see if that works any
    sb> better?

I'm using 2.7.2.  Unfortunately it's the only C compiler I have on
Sparc (I *really* need to remedy that soon).  I have access to an Irix
5.3 box with, I think, an SGI compiler.  Will try that and see what
happens.

-Barry

