From xemacs-m  Sat Feb 15 06:58:55 1997
Received: from altair.xemacs.org (steve@xemacs.miranova.com [206.190.83.19])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id GAA02114
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Sat, 15 Feb 1997 06:58:54 -0600 (CST)
Received: (from steve@localhost)
	by altair.xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id FAA26607;
	Sat, 15 Feb 1997 05:10:21 -0800
Mail-Copies-To: never
To: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
Subject: Re: Is your (favorite) package not in XEmacs and should be?
References: <m27mkb0wip.fsf@altair.xemacs.org> 	<199702150144.TAA26582@raiden.grainger.uiuc.edu> <199702150535.WAA03627@branagh.ta52.lanl.gov> <m2k9oay4pw.fsf@altair.xemacs.org> <rjafp69qvs.fsf@zuse.dina.kvl.dk>
X-Url: http://www.miranova.com/%7Esteve/
X-Face: #!T9!#9s-3o8)*uHlX{Ug[xW7E7Wr!*L46-OxqMu\xz23v|R9q}lH?cRS{rCNe^'[`^sr5"
 f8*@r4ipO6Jl!:Ccq<xoV[Qz2u8<8-+Vwf2gzJ44lf_/y9OaQ`@#Q65{U4/TC)i2`~/M&QI$X>p:9I
 OSS'2{-)-4wBnVeg0S\O4Al@)uC[pD|+
X-Attribution: sb
From: Steven L Baur <steve@miranova.com>
In-Reply-To: Per Abrahamsen's message of 15 Feb 1997 13:48:39 +0100
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.105)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Date: 15 Feb 1997 05:10:20 -0800
Message-ID: <m2hgje8bb7.fsf@altair.xemacs.org>
Lines: 14
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.12/XEmacs 20.1

Per Abrahamsen writes:

> Steven L Baur <steve@miranova.com> writes:

>> The timing is just not right now, for either Auc TeX or XEmacs.

> Can't speak for XEmacs, but the timing has never been better for AUC
> TeX.

Uh oh.  My understanding was the latest version of AUC TeX was
somewhat broken on XEmacs.  Is this not the case?
-- 
steve@miranova.com baur
Unsolicited commercial e-mail will be billed at $250/message.

