From xemacs-m  Mon Feb 17 18:08:53 1997
Received: from crystal.WonderWorks.COM (crystal.WonderWorks.com [192.203.206.1])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id SAA24199
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Mon, 17 Feb 1997 18:08:52 -0600 (CST)
Received: by crystal.WonderWorks.COM 
	id QQcdiu24389; Mon, 17 Feb 1997 19:08:52 -0500 (EST)
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 1997 19:08:52 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <QQcdiu24389.199702180008@crystal.WonderWorks.COM>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Kyle Jones <kyle_jones@wonderworks.com>
To: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
Subject: Re: Safe elisp functions?
In-Reply-To: <199702172353.SAA04484@localhost.interport.net>
References: <199702172311.PAA23394@newman>
	<m2zpx356pc.fsf@altair.xemacs.org>
	<199702172353.SAA04484@localhost.interport.net>

Javascript was designed for net use and look at the problem
they've had.  Emacs-Lisp isn't designed with security in mind at
all, and is constantly being extended by RMS, who cares not a
whit about security last time I checked.  Therefore I can't help
but be VERY fearful.

