From xemacs-m  Wed Feb 19 10:14:09 1997
Received: from loiosh.kei.com (ckd@loiosh.kei.com [192.88.144.32])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id KAA05691
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Wed, 19 Feb 1997 10:14:08 -0600 (CST)
Received: (from ckd@localhost)
	by loiosh.kei.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) id LAA03680;
	Wed, 19 Feb 1997 11:12:54 -0500 (EST)
To: Steven L Baur <steve@miranova.com>
Cc: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
Subject: Re: deep weirdness in send_process and/or lstreams
References: <w4ybcltxb7.fsf@loiosh.kei.com> <m2pvxxbls7.fsf@altair.xemacs.org>
X-Attribution: ckd
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.105)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
From: Christopher Davis <ckd@loiosh.kei.com>
Date: 19 Feb 1997 11:12:53 -0500
In-Reply-To: Steven L Baur's message of 18 Feb 1997 17:57:12 -0800
Message-ID: <w4lo8k4vwa.fsf@loiosh.kei.com>
Lines: 10
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.13/XEmacs 19.15

sb> == Steven L Baur <steve@miranova.com>

 sb> Try this: enable article splitting, set the split size to some low
 sb> number like 100 lines, and post something large enough to be split
 sb> into multiple parts to a local test group.

 sb> Does that hang too?

Yes, that hangs too (the first part is posted, but XEmacs gets stuck
before sending the second part).

