From xemacs-m  Wed Feb 19 19:52:28 1997
Received: from loiosh.kei.com (ckd@loiosh.kei.com [192.88.144.32])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id TAA20829
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Wed, 19 Feb 1997 19:52:27 -0600 (CST)
Received: (from ckd@localhost)
	by loiosh.kei.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) id UAA05154;
	Wed, 19 Feb 1997 20:51:26 -0500 (EST)
To: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
Subject: Re: deep weirdness in send_process and/or lstreams
References: <w4ybcltxb7.fsf@loiosh.kei.com> <m2pvxxbls7.fsf@altair.xemacs.org> <w4lo8k4vwa.fsf@loiosh.kei.com> <m2914k7nsb.fsf@altair.xemacs.org>
X-Attribution: ckd
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.105)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
From: Christopher Davis <ckd@loiosh.kei.com>
Date: 19 Feb 1997 20:51:26 -0500
In-Reply-To: Steven L Baur's message of 19 Feb 1997 08:39:48 -0800
Message-ID: <w43eus1bz5.fsf@loiosh.kei.com>
Lines: 13
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.13/XEmacs 19.15

sb> == Steven L Baur <steve@miranova.com>

 sb> O.K.  This is probably a long-standing problem then.  Once long ago
 sb> (before Gnus 5.0) I ran into something like this and tried
 sb> unsuccessfully to convince Lars it was a problem with Gnus.  It
 sb> doesn't happen when splitting and calling sendmail, it does happen
 sb> when splitting a message for a multi-part post.

Right, but when calling sendmail you're not using a network socket (unless
you're using smtpmail.el, I suppose).

There's nothing in the elisp that I can see that would cause it to hang.
I don't think it's a bug in Gnus.

