From xemacs-m  Mon Feb 24 15:47:11 1997
Received: from cdc.noaa.gov (manager.Colorado.EDU [128.138.218.210])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id PAA18887
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Mon, 24 Feb 1997 15:47:10 -0600 (CST)
Received: from suomi by cdc.noaa.gov (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4)
	id OAA06592; Mon, 24 Feb 1997 14:47:09 -0700
Received: by suomi (SMI-8.6) id OAA23188; Mon, 24 Feb 1997 14:47:09 -0700
Sender: mdb@cdc.noaa.gov
To: Neal Becker <neal@ctd.comsat.com>
Cc: XEmacs beta-list <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>
Subject: Re: [19.15-b95 / 20.1-b2] lazy-lock lossage?
References: <vk67zhvr5f.fsf@cdc.noaa.gov> <u9lo8dhora.fsf@neal.ctd.comsat.com>
Organization: CIRES, University of Colorado
X-Attribution: mb
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.105)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
From: Mark Borges <mdb@cdc.noaa.gov>
Date: 24 Feb 1997 14:47:08 -0700
In-Reply-To: Neal Becker's message of 24 Feb 1997 16:34:33 -0500
Message-ID: <vk3eulvpur.fsf@cdc.noaa.gov>
Lines: 13
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.15/XEmacs 19.15

>> On 24 Feb 1997 16:34:33 -0500,
>> Neal Becker(NB) wrote:
NB> Yes, lazy-lock is the culprit in the massive slow downs.  (I don't
NB> know what became of the messages I sent earlier today on this
NB> subject).

FWIW, lazy-lock was updated from v1.15 to v1.16 in betas 19.15-b95 and
20.1-b2.

Using, the version from the previous betas seems to work for me.

-- 
  -mb-

