From xemacs-m  Mon Feb 24 16:31:58 1997
Received: from crystal.WonderWorks.COM (crystal.WonderWorks.com [192.203.206.1])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id QAA19372
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Mon, 24 Feb 1997 16:31:54 -0600 (CST)
Received: by crystal.WonderWorks.COM 
	id QQceik18902; Mon, 24 Feb 1997 17:31:54 -0500 (EST)
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 1997 17:31:54 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <QQceik18902.199702242231@crystal.WonderWorks.COM>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Kyle Jones <kyle_jones@wonderworks.com>
To: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
Subject: Re: b95 and ange-ftp
In-Reply-To: <m2d8tpn8ff.fsf@altair.xemacs.org>
References: <199702241314.IAA08823@anthem.CNRI.Reston.Va.US>
	<m2d8tpn8ff.fsf@altair.xemacs.org>
X-Face: /cA45WHG7jWq>(O3&Z57Y<"WsX5ddc,4c#w0F*zrV#=M
        0@~@,s;b,aMtR5Sqs"+nU.z^CSFQ9t`z2>W,S,]:[+2^
        Nbf6v4g>!&,7R4Ot4Wg{&tm=WX7P["9%a)_da48-^tGy
        ,qz]Z,Zz\{E.,]'EO+F)@$KtF&V

Steven L Baur writes:
 > Barry A Warsaw writes:
 > 
 > > I'm all for upgrading to efs, but I think it would be a good idea to
 > > put a fake ange-ftp.el in lisp/dired (didn't somebody else bring this
 > > up already?).
 > 
 > Providing an 'ange-ftp feature is misleading.  If you can't trust
 > `features' who can you trust?

Indeed.  If you're going to break a user's configuration break it
immediately and visibly so they know it's broken.  Don't pretend
things are the same, because they'll just submit bug reports for
all the little things that are broken instead of the one big thing.

