From xemacs-m  Tue Feb 25 04:02:21 1997
Received: from maes.esrin.esa.it (maes.esrin.esa.it [192.106.252.50])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id EAA28701
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Tue, 25 Feb 1997 04:02:10 -0600 (CST)
Received: from mail.esrin.esa.it (plod.esrin.esa.it) by maes.esrin.esa.it with SMTP id AA12261
  (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>); Tue, 25 Feb 1997 11:02:12 +0100
Received: from penelope.esa.it by mail.esrin.esa.it (4.1/SMI-4.1)
	id AA14757; Tue, 25 Feb 97 10:02:13 GMT
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 97 10:02:13 GMT
Message-Id: <9702251002.AA14757@mail.esrin.esa.it>
Received: by penelope.esa.it (4.1/SMI-4.1)
	id AA13867; Tue, 25 Feb 97 11:06:54 +0100
From: Simon Marshall <Simon.Marshall@esrin.esa.it>
To: XEmacs Beta <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>
In-Reply-To: <9702250930.AA14387@mail.esrin.esa.it> (message from Simon
	Marshall on Tue, 25 Feb 97 09:30:53 GMT)
Subject: Re: lazy lock cpu usage
Reply-To: Simon Marshall <Simon.Marshall@esrin.esa.it>

Sudeep> XEmacs is unable to process the key input at the keyboard repeat
Sudeep> rate).

Gotcha.  In XEmacs 19.15b95, it seems input-pending-p always returns nil.

