From xemacs-m  Tue Feb 25 05:44:00 1997
Received: from frege.math.ethz.ch (root@frege-d-math-north-g-west.math.ethz.ch [129.132.145.3])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id FAA02972
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Tue, 25 Feb 1997 05:43:59 -0600 (CST)
Received: from fresnel.math.ethz.ch (vroonhof@fresnel [129.132.145.6]) by frege.math.ethz.ch (8.6.12/Main-STAT-mailer) with ESMTP id MAA12380 for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Tue, 25 Feb 1997 12:43:50 +0100
Received: (vroonhof@localhost) by fresnel.math.ethz.ch (8.6.9/D-MATH-client) id MAA11945; Tue, 25 Feb 1997 12:42:44 +0100
Sender: vroonhof@math.ethz.ch
To: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
Subject: Re: [19.15-b95 / 20.1-b2] lazy-lock lossage?
References: <9702250814.AA13574@mail.esrin.esa.it>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.94)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
From: Jan Vroonhof <vroonhof@math.ethz.ch>
Date: 25 Feb 1997 12:42:43 +0100
In-Reply-To: Simon Marshall's message of Tue, 25 Feb 97 08:14:41 GMT
Message-ID: <bysp2ldscs.fsf@math.ethz.ch>
Lines: 13
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.13/XEmacs 19.15

Simon Marshall <Simon.Marshall@esrin.esa.it> writes:

> 
> Somebody said that b94 was OK, and that had lazy-lock.el 1.15 (first to
> appear in b7).  Right?  I don't have the space to keep earlier betas.

b94 is NOT ok. I am having the same problems with grep and LaTeX
output (the latter shouldn't be fontified so I don't realy see what is
happening).

Jan

P.S. How easy is it do disable lazylock for testing purposes?

