From xemacs-m  Thu Feb 27 04:42:05 1997
Received: from pallas.spacetec.no (pallas.spacetec.no [192.51.5.92])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id EAA23231
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 04:42:03 -0600 (CST)
Received: (from tor@localhost) by pallas.spacetec.no (8.7.1/8.7.1) id LAA10497 for xemacs-beta@xemacs.org; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 11:50:09 +0100
Message-Id: <199702271050.LAA10497@pallas.spacetec.no>
From: tor@spacetec.no (Tor Arntsen)
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 11:50:08 +0100
In-Reply-To: Steven L Baur <steve@miranova.com>
       "Re: 20.1-b2 with dynamic PURESIZE success, mostly" (Feb 26, 21:58)
X-Mailer: Mail User's Shell (7.2.5 10/14/92)
To: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
Subject: Re: 20.1-b2 with dynamic PURESIZE success, mostly

On Feb 26, 21:58, Steven L Baur wrote:
>David Moore writes:
>> ... Now if it would automatically rebuild, w/o me having to wake up
>> to type `make' again... :)
>
>I'm hoping someone who knows how to do this properly gets inspired
>once this mechanism is in distributed betas. :-)

I've got a hundred more emails to wade through, so maybe
someone beat me to it.. but I would just do
'make;make', if there's no adjustment the second
make won't do much (if anything), if there is I can continue
sleeping while it rebuilds.. 
I would think a 'make; make install' should always succeed
in doing the right thing.

Tor


