From xemacs-m  Thu Feb 27 10:15:22 1997
Received: from mailhost.lanl.gov (mailhost.lanl.gov [128.165.3.12])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id KAA06577
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 10:15:22 -0600 (CST)
Received: from branagh.ta52.lanl.gov (branagh.ta52.lanl.gov [128.165.144.9]) by mailhost.lanl.gov (8.8.5/8.8.3) with SMTP id JAA23352 for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 09:15:21 -0700 (MST)
Received: by branagh.ta52.lanl.gov (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4)
	id JAA08799; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 09:11:18 -0700
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 09:11:18 -0700
Message-Id: <199702271611.JAA08799@branagh.ta52.lanl.gov>
From: "John A. Turner" <turner@branagh.ta52.lanl.gov>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
Subject: Re: XEmacs-20.1-b3 is released
In-Reply-To: <u9u3myqltx.fsf@neal.ctd.comsat.com>
References: <9702271504.AA07869@mail.esrin.esa.it>
	<u9u3myqltx.fsf@neal.ctd.comsat.com>
Reply-To: turner@lanl.gov

Neal Becker writes:

 > This is NOT what I see with 20.1.  Process output is hanging, I didn't
 > track down why.  It ALWAYS happens with 1.16, and NOT with 1.15.  This
 > is true of 20.1b2, and 20.1b3.

Argh.  Let's see if I can summarize what we're all saying:

          1.14BW   1.15   1.16

19.15b90           OK
19.15b93           bad
19.15b94           bad
19.15b95  bad      bad    bad
20.1b2             OK     bad
20.1b3             OK     bad

Can anybody fill in any of the other open locations?

I still have b90 around, so I'll try it + 1.16.  That should be
interesting.

I don't have b93 or b94 around any more.

-- 
John Turner
http://www.lanl.gov/home/turner

