From xemacs-m  Tue Mar  4 07:58:27 1997
Received: from frege.math.ethz.ch (root@frege-d-math-north-g-west.math.ethz.ch [129.132.145.3])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id HAA17201
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Tue, 4 Mar 1997 07:58:23 -0600 (CST)
Received: from fresnel.math.ethz.ch (vroonhof@fresnel [129.132.145.6]) by frege.math.ethz.ch (8.6.12/Main-STAT-mailer) with ESMTP id OAA11005 for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Tue, 4 Mar 1997 14:58:04 +0100
Received: (vroonhof@localhost) by fresnel.math.ethz.ch (8.6.9/D-MATH-client) id OAA02872; Tue, 4 Mar 1997 14:56:27 +0100
Sender: vroonhof@math.ethz.ch
To: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
Subject: Re: Visibility mega patch [please test]
References: <by67z8ep34.fsf_-_@math.ethz.ch> <QQcfjh17852.199703040528@crystal.WonderWorks.COM>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.105)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
From: Jan Vroonhof <vroonhof@math.ethz.ch>
Date: 04 Mar 1997 14:56:26 +0100
In-Reply-To: Kyle Jones's message of Tue, 4 Mar 1997 00:28:18 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <byn2sjbw1h.fsf@math.ethz.ch>
Lines: 18
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.16/XEmacs 19.15

Kyle Jones <kyle_jones@wonderworks.com> writes:

> When the user presses SPC, VM has to decide whether to scroll the
> message or to expose the message.  In a configuration with separate
> summary and message frames, the summary frame often covers the message
> frame.  VM wants to use frame-totally-visible-p to determine if the
> message frame needs to be exposed (raised).

Ah, I see.

> It uses frame-visible-p
> under 19.14 because frame-totally-visible-p is broken there, and
> frame-visible-p is better than nothing.

And frame-totally-visible-p isn't changed by my patch so that jsut
leaves scroll-in-place.el.

Jan

