From xemacs-m  Wed Mar  5 05:49:21 1997
Received: from mercury.Sun.COM (mercury.Sun.COM [192.9.25.1])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id FAA26097
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Wed, 5 Mar 1997 05:49:19 -0600 (CST)
Received: from Canada.Sun.COM ([129.155.5.101]) by mercury.Sun.COM (SMI-8.6/mail.byaddr) with SMTP id DAA25063; Wed, 5 Mar 1997 03:47:31 -0800
Received: from scooter.canada.sun.com by Canada.Sun.COM (SMI-8.6/SMI-5.3)
	id GAA04120; Wed, 5 Mar 1997 06:48:28 -0500
Received: from verve.canada.sun.com by scooter.canada.sun.com (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4)
	id GAA17844; Wed, 5 Mar 1997 06:45:49 -0500
Received: by verve.canada.sun.com (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4)
	id GAA04599; Wed, 5 Mar 1997 06:45:50 -0500
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 1997 06:45:50 -0500
Message-Id: <199703051145.GAA04599@verve.canada.sun.com>
From: Georg Nikodym <georgn@Canada.Sun.COM>
To: Steven L Baur <steve@miranova.com>
Cc: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
Subject: Re: display-time on tty
In-Reply-To: <m27mjmddyj.fsf@altair.xemacs.org>
References: <199703050409.VAA15018@branagh.ta52.lanl.gov>
	<m2lo83q7li.fsf@altair.xemacs.org>
	<199703050454.VAA15953@branagh.ta52.lanl.gov>
	<m2d8tedi2e.fsf@altair.xemacs.org>
	<xcd4teqzxh6.fsf@jordan.cs.uchicago.edu>
	<m27mjmddyj.fsf@altair.xemacs.org>
Reply-To: georgn@Canada.Sun.COM
X-Face:  ,~EI@l7'&P{\d++e`EMjNTNpzsxJPg(H]?Sd_T3xIlq[(PT[.D;A_/k)qfeC@m\/1]A{vZD
 r4&Lme-/M]c'Q>>:VM|L^<ED=j@dG!ld,bQ:IhT53q'x>6wZKH3iCT6Ff1-`*z{vCiT}+%(irA6TOn
 S~pFtml1bL\=kp%0PsLcF3+Q/e${o|S/<NUFDrU@;^o(D+av1g>Ce=ztlPGb$?up%c-*l'wmjw\sw;
 D__0Z;+93I+Kx6Mxdc]+|2V03aE@D8-fMT_v[~~FC9I\*|72QVW,aQ!`hHp_.gE.W&kxla2#)\Cmo
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.105)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII

>>>>> "SLB" == Steven L Baur <steve@miranova.com> writes:

 SLB> Soren Dayton writes:
 >> Steven L Baur <steve@miranova.com> writes:
 >>> The other suggestion is about the am/pm indicator.  To be really
 >>> like a digital clock it ought to display as an upper dot and a
 >>> lower dot. :-)

 >> of course I have seen at least three different conventions about
 >> how this is done...

 SLB> Oh, well.  I also hadn't thought of 24 hour format as being a
 SLB> European standard.  I'd thought of it as being US military
 SLB> format ...

All this good work and I'm sitting here wondering why I hadn't yet
seen it and then I realized that I'm using reportmail.el instead of
time.el...

Seems that the next project should be to rationalize the two, which
share (read: clobber) a similar namespace.

BTW, I like reportmail because it has the ability to define junk
mail...

The other question I have is why does all this really great inspired
hacking happen so close (?) to releases, or have we abandoned the
dream of getting 19.15 done and out thereby allowing us to concentrate
on a single source tree?

