From xemacs-m  Tue Mar 11 21:04:37 1997
Received: from mharnois.workgroup.net (pm1-021.sbt.net [206.153.211.21])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id VAA01664
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Tue, 11 Mar 1997 21:04:35 -0600 (CST)
Received: (from mharnois@localhost)
	by mharnois.workgroup.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) id VAA00299;
	Tue, 11 Mar 1997 21:04:33 -0600
To: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
Subject: Re: glibc-2.0
References: <u9g1y27fjr.fsf@neal.ctd.comsat.com> <ubbu8q9wro.fsf@cognac.physik.uni-erlangen.de>
From: Michael Harnois <mharnois@sbt.net>
Date: 11 Mar 1997 21:04:33 -0600
In-Reply-To: Achim Oppelt's message of 11 Mar 1997 18:14:03 +0100
Message-ID: <87d8t5zu7y.fsf@mharnois.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-shoot-me>
Lines: 15
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.25/XEmacs 20.1

Achim Oppelt <aoppelt@theorie3.physik.uni-erlangen.de> writes:

> I find it hard to believe that you can use your old XFree86 libraries with
> the new libc, and according to the problems page referenced in the above
> page, there is currently no version of XFree86 available which is built
> against glibc 2.

Yeah, I read that problems page, and it made me realize I must have
done something terribly wrong, 'cause I rebuilt all of X with glibc
and I didn't have any compile problems at all.

--
+  Michael D. Harnois                      + If you want to follow Jesus,  +
+  Redeemer Lutheran Church, Washburn, IA  + you better look good on wood. +
+  mharnois@sbt.net  aa0bt@aa0bt.ampr.org  +         -- Daniel Berrigan    +

