From xemacs-m  Thu Mar 13 01:19:53 1997
Received: from pentagana.sonic.jp (jhod@tokyo-03-109.gol.com [202.243.51.109])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id BAA19033
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Thu, 13 Mar 1997 01:19:51 -0600 (CST)
Received: (from jhod@localhost) by pentagana.sonic.jp (8.7.1+2.6Wbeta4/3.4W3) id QAA00713; Thu, 13 Mar 1997 16:13:43 +0900
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 1997 16:13:43 +0900
Message-Id: <199703130713.QAA00713@pentagana.sonic.jp>
From: P E Jareth Hein <jhod@po.iijnet.or.jp>
To: Steve Dunham <dunham@dunham.tcimet.net>
Cc: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
Subject: Japanese input (was Re: gnuattach)
In-Reply-To: <m2zpw8qsdz.fsf@dunham.tcimet.net>
References: <199703130152.TAA14794@xemacs.org>
	<m2zpw8qsdz.fsf@dunham.tcimet.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.105)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII

>>>>> "Steve" == Steve Dunham <dunham@dunham.tcimet.net> writes:

Steve> I also have a completely tangental question: I'm planning on
Steve> learning japanese this summer and wondered what input method is
Steve> recommended with xemacs-20: wnn or canna?

Of course I'm going to tell you wnn ;-) It still has some bugs, but
those will be fixed Real Soon Now (as soon as the current crunch here
at the office subsides). Actually, either would probably work well,
with the folloing caveat emptor. canna is completly contained within
xemacs, while wnn relies on jserver, an external process. And without
some patches, jserver doesn't quite work out of the box. I'll be
postingg some patches on Saturday for wnn, Xlib and (hopefully) wnn
and after that you can make a better choice, perhaps.

Good luck on your studies!

--Jareth
 


