From xemacs-m  Wed Dec 18 19:11:45 1996
Received: from venus.Sun.COM (venus.Sun.COM [192.9.25.5])
          by xemacs.cs.uiuc.edu (8.8.4/8.8.4) with SMTP
	  id TAA06934 for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Wed, 18 Dec 1996 19:11:44 -0600 (CST)
Received: from infodock.com ([206.13.40.192]) by venus.Sun.COM (SMI-8.6/mail.byaddr) with ESMTP id RAA15888 for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Wed, 18 Dec 1996 17:11:17 -0800
Received: (from weiner@localhost) by infodock.com (8.7.4/8.7.3) id RAA09746; Wed, 18 Dec 1996 17:08:26 -0800
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 1996 17:08:26 -0800
Message-Id: <199612190108.RAA09746@infodock.com>
From: Bob Weiner <weiner@wave.infodock.com>
To: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
In-reply-to: <m2g213uz60.fsf@altair.xemacs.org> (message from Steven L Baur on
	18 Dec 1996 16:59:35 -0800)
Subject: Re: 19.15 b4 success and beef

> Georg> ... next-line-add-newlines ...
> 
> I want to change the default on this variable so bad I can't stand
> it.  I screamed the first time I found out next-line could modify the
> buffer :-P, and there was no next-line-add-newlines in those days  ...
> 
> How many people really like a setting of `t'?

Not me, although I do think it would be better to try to get agreement
with the GNU Emacs folks on a new setting before changing it in
XEmacs.

Bob

