From xemacs-m  Wed Mar 19 07:47:31 1997
Received: from mail.cis.ohio-state.edu (mail.cis.ohio-state.edu [164.107.8.55])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id HAA25643
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Wed, 19 Mar 1997 07:47:17 -0600 (CST)
Received: from calico.cis.ohio-state.edu (calico.cis.ohio-state.edu [164.107.142.11]) by mail.cis.ohio-state.edu (8.6.7/8.6.4) with ESMTP id IAA06175; Wed, 19 Mar 1997 08:45:00 -0500
Received: (ware@localhost) by calico.cis.ohio-state.edu (8.8.0/8.6.4) id IAA05919; Wed, 19 Mar 1997 08:44:59 -0500 (EST)
To: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
Subject: Re: 20.1b8 success on Solaris -- but it's *SLOW*
References: <199703190222.SAA10998@sandman> 	<m2k9n4po96.fsf@altair.xemacs.org> <QQchmn21909.199703190417@crystal.WonderWorks.COM> <m24te8pjrs.fsf@altair.xemacs.org>
From: Pete Ware <ware@cis.ohio-state.edu>
Date: 19 Mar 1997 08:44:56 -0500
In-Reply-To: Steven L Baur's message of 18 Mar 1997 20:50:47 -0800
Message-ID: <vwmwwr4vvvr.fsf@calico.cis.ohio-state.edu>
Lines: 21
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.26/XEmacs 19.15(beta99)

Steven L Baur <steve@miranova.com> writes:

...
> 
> Index: src/process.c
> ===================================================================
...
> +
>  #ifdef  EMACS_BLOCK_SIGNAL
>    EMACS_BLOCK_SIGNAL (SIGCHLD);
>  #endif
> @@ -2285,6 +2290,11 @@
...
>  #ifdef EMACS_BLOCK_SIGNAL
>    if (block_sigchld)
>      EMACS_BLOCK_SIGNAL (SIGCHLD);

Wouldn't it be better to just define EMACS_BLOCK_SIGNAL() as empty?  
[I hate reading ifdef'd code].

--pete

