From xemacs-m  Wed Mar 19 09:48:10 1997
Received: from gol1.gol.com (gol1.gol.com [202.243.48.4])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id JAA26189
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Wed, 19 Mar 1997 09:48:09 -0600 (CST)
Received: from Pentagana.sonic.jp (jhod@pm-6-221.tokyo.gol.com [202.243.51.221])
	by gol1.gol.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id AAA10062
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Thu, 20 Mar 1997 00:48:08 +0900 (JST)
Received: (from jhod@localhost) by Pentagana.sonic.jp (8.7.2/8.7.2) id AAA00194; Thu, 20 Mar 1997 00:45:45 +0900
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 1997 00:45:45 +0900
Message-Id: <199703191545.AAA00194@Pentagana.sonic.jp>
From: P E Jareth Hein <jhod@po.iijnet.or.jp>
To: XEmacs Beta Mailing List <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>
Subject: RFC undo changes
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.105)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII

While working on input systems, I've come across a need/desire to add
to the classes of things that can be in buffer-undo-list. I'd like to
propose adding a way to put a function on the list, so that when hit
it could put several things like translation states, etc back in one
foop. Of course, I'm proposing to do most of the work (although I'm
not adverse to help... ;-) ) but I was wondering if anyone would get
all fired up screaming upset at this, which is probably yet another
way XEmacs will diverge from FSFmacs. 

Or, on the other hand, is there a way to do this and I'm just being
obtuse?

--Jareth

