From xemacs-m  Thu Mar 20 18:01:05 1997
Received: from crystal.WonderWorks.COM (crystal.WonderWorks.com [192.203.206.1])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id SAA23678
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Thu, 20 Mar 1997 18:01:04 -0600 (CST)
Received: by crystal.WonderWorks.COM 
	id QQchtg07541; Thu, 20 Mar 1997 19:01:05 -0500 (EST)
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 1997 19:01:05 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <QQchtg07541.199703210001@crystal.WonderWorks.COM>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Kyle Jones <kyle_jones@wonderworks.com>
To: XEmacs Beta List <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>
Subject: Re: X-Face issues (still) in TM (I think) with some trace output
In-Reply-To: <199703202355.SAA21630@amber.vis-av.com>
References: <199703202106.QAA21223@amber.vis-av.com>
	<QQchtf07318.199703202348@crystal.WonderWorks.COM>
	<199703202355.SAA21630@amber.vis-av.com>
X-Mailer: VM 6.20 under 19.15 XEmacs Lucid (beta101)
X-Face: /cA45WHG7jWq>(O3&Z57Y<"WsX5ddc,4c#w0F*zrV#=M
        0@~@,s;b,aMtR5Sqs"+nU.z^CSFQ9t`z2>W,S,]:[+2^
        Nbf6v4g>!&,7R4Ot4Wg{&tm=WX7P["9%a)_da48-^tGy
        ,qz]Z,Zz\{E.,]'EO+F)@$KtF&V

Derrell Lipman writes:
 > >>>>> "  Kyle" == Kyle Jones <kyle_jones@wonderworks.com> writes:
 > 
 >   Kyle> Derrell Lipman writes:
 > >> I'm still having the same X-Face image-going-away problems that I
 > >> was having a few days ago.  I've traced where the image disappears,
 > >> but I don't understand why or what it's doing.  Here's the
 > >> scenario.  [...]
 > 
 >   Kyle> Is the TM preview buffer the same one that VM is attaching the
 >   Kyle> X-Face iamge to?  If not then the likely problem is that you
 >   Kyle> are not looking at the buffer that contains the image.
 > 
 > 
 > It appears to be.  When I just received your message, it appeared in a
 > buffer called *Preview-INBOX*, in MIME-View mode it appears, which is
 > the middle window created by some combination of VM, TM, and BBDB.
 > The top window is VM's INBOX Summary, and the bottom window is the
 > BBDB window.

That pretty much confirms just the opposite.  The image is
attached to an extent in the INBOX buffer.  It isn't going to
appear in *Preview-INBOX*.  Hurray, no VM bug.

