From xemacs-m  Fri Mar 21 02:29:34 1997
Received: from sicmail.epfl.ch (sicmail.epfl.ch [128.178.50.31])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id CAA00965
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Fri, 21 Mar 1997 02:29:24 -0600 (CST)
Received: from lspsun16.epfl.ch by sicmail.epfl.ch with SMTP (PP);
          Fri, 21 Mar 1997 09:03:40 +0100
Received: by lspsun16.epfl.ch (5.x/Epfl-4.9-c/MX) id AA00350;
          Fri, 21 Mar 1997 09:13:56 +0100
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 1997 09:13:56 +0100
Message-Id: <9703210813.AA00350@lspsun16.epfl.ch>
From: Oscar Figueiredo <Oscar.Figueiredo@di.epfl.ch>
To: derrell@vis-av.com
Cc: XEmacs Beta List <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>
Subject: Re: X-Face issues (still) in TM (I think) with some trace output
In-Reply-To: <199703210000.TAA21650@amber.vis-av.com>
References: <199703202106.QAA21223@amber.vis-av.com> <QQchtf07318.199703202348@crystal.WonderWorks.COM> <199703210000.TAA21650@amber.vis-av.com>
X-Attribution: Oscar
X-Face: &f0TVPZirOQ$"C[5pZkDY(1~+M1p0&edTtJPL-*?u$b(vr<1m?~iZBqp2YoDS[IyxDHV<MN 
        x;/;<I]H;2OOZd:+cj^}L-,Hixp!@].>U~)KHl|Kpm"='5OF?vT]k_HQ1]|^}Pm>,;+]iJCt_-Y[S\ 
        EpwT);2R8#[4dt8~*}&#3$6xI4jNZM9lVHua'vIM[PEx*#cgxCVruf1zN0}
X-Mailer: ViewMail (vm) Version 6.19 with Emacs 20.0 XEmacs Lucid
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.105)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII

>>>>> "Derrell" == Derrell Lipman <derrell@vis-av.com> writes:

>>>>> "  Kyle" == Kyle Jones <kyle_jones@wonderworks.com> writes:
  Kyle> Is the TM preview buffer the same one that VM is attaching the
  Kyle> X-Face iamge to?  If not then the likely problem is that you
  Kyle> are not looking at the buffer that contains the image.

  Derrell> Sorry for all of the messages.

  Derrell> The answer to your question is NO.  I now see that while
  Derrell> the X-Face image is NOT displayed, the buffer being shown
  Derrell> is *Preview-INBOX*.  If I then hit 'x', which I had
  Derrell> previously determined would properly display the face
  Derrell> image, it switches to a buffer called VM 6.20: INBOX.

  Derrell> So, now the questions are, why are TM and VM displaying the
  Derrell> message in different buffers?  Which one is "wrong"?  How
  Derrell> do I fix it?

There is nothing wrong in this behaviour. When processing MIME you
need to have *two* buffers. The first one is VM INBOX (also called VM
folder buffer) that contains the *raw* version of the message. From
that we parse the message according to the MIME standards into another
buffer (VM 6 calls it 'inbox Presentation', TM calls it
*Preview-INBOX*. See tm-vm.info for more.

tm-vm is supposed to ensure the XFace header is copied appropriately
from the folder buffer to the Preview buffer. This has been the case
for a long time and I cannot reproduce the bug under XEmacs 20. I
suppose there is something peculiar happening in 19.15. I am now
compiling it and will investigate the case.

Oscar


