From xemacs-m  Sun Mar 23 16:27:06 1997
Received: from altair.xemacs.org (steve@xemacs.miranova.com [206.190.83.19])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id QAA09033
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Sun, 23 Mar 1997 16:27:05 -0600 (CST)
Received: (from steve@localhost)
	by altair.xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id OAA15435;
	Sun, 23 Mar 1997 14:38:40 -0800
Mail-Copies-To: never
To: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
Subject: Re: patches to compile.el
References: <199703230329.WAA05074@pochacco.alphatech.com>
X-Url: http://www.miranova.com/%7Esteve/
X-Face: #!T9!#9s-3o8)*uHlX{Ug[xW7E7Wr!*L46-OxqMu\xz23v|R9q}lH?cRS{rCNe^'[`^sr5"
 f8*@r4ipO6Jl!:Ccq<xoV[Qz2u8<8-+Vwf2gzJ44lf_/y9OaQ`@#Q65{U4/TC)i2`~/M&QI$X>p:9I
 OSS'2{-)-4wBnVeg0S\O4Al@)uC[pD|+
X-Attribution: sb
From: Steven L Baur <steve@miranova.com>
In-Reply-To: greg@alphatech.com's message of Sat, 22 Mar 1997 22:29:38 -0500
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.106)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Date: 23 Mar 1997 14:38:39 -0800
Message-ID: <m267yimdxs.fsf@altair.xemacs.org>
Lines: 23
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.35/XEmacs 20.1(beta10)

Greg Klanderman writes:

> Steve- can we uncomment the code to get at the minibuffer prompt so a
> hack (assuming fixed width font) can be written to better implement
> resize-minibuffer-count-window-lines? (i don't use icomplete..)

I wasn't sure what code you were talking about when I first read
this.  Presumably you mean this:

/* Useless FSFmacs functions */
/* More than useless.  I've nuked minibuf_prompt_width so they won't
   function at all in XEmacs at the moment.  They are used to
   implement some braindamage in FSF which we aren't including. --cet */

#if 0
xxDEFUN ("minibuffer-prompt", Fminibuffer_prompt, Sminibuffer_prompt, 0, 0, 0,
  "Return the prompt string of the currently-active minibuffer.\n"

`cet' is Chuck?  I doubt I will accept any patches for uncommenting
this for 20.1, but will consider it for 20.2.
-- 
steve@miranova.com baur
Unsolicited commercial e-mail will be billed at $250/message.

