From xemacs-m  Wed Mar 26 07:09:49 1997
Received: from pallas.spacetec.no (pallas.spacetec.no [192.51.5.92])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id HAA26918
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Wed, 26 Mar 1997 07:09:47 -0600 (CST)
Received: (from tor@localhost) by pallas.spacetec.no (8.7.1/8.7.1) id OAA08575 for xemacs-beta@xemacs.org; Wed, 26 Mar 1997 14:09:09 +0100
Message-Id: <199703261309.OAA08575@pallas.spacetec.no>
From: tor@spacetec.no (Tor Arntsen)
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 1997 14:09:08 +0100
In-Reply-To: Steven L Baur <steve@miranova.com>
       "Re: 19.15b104 ok on Linux & AIX" (Mar 26,  3:57)
X-Mailer: Mail User's Shell (7.2.5 10/14/92)
To: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
Subject: Re: 19.15b104 ok on Linux & AIX

On Mar 26,  3:57, Steven L Baur wrote:
>William M Perry writes:
>
>> I can pretty much build distributions for anything,
> ...
>> for all the platforms I have (Linux, IRIX 6.x, HP/UX 9.x, AIX,
>> Solaris/Sparc, Solaris/x86, BSDI 2.1, BSDI 3.0, SCO OpenServer,
>> SCO UnixWare, FreeBSD, and SunOS).
>
>Thanks William, from the deafening silence in response to the call for 
>kit builders, I'll probably need you to build many of those.  Perhaps
>binary kits are something we should not do in the future.
>
>I've gotten volunteers for Solaris 2.5, Intel Linux, all DEC (next
>month), BSDI 2.0, 2.1 and AIX 3.2.5.  Everything else is uncovered.

I could easily do a kit for IRIX 6.2, but I haven't volunteered since I 
don't have sound on the Challenge I use (nor the audio libs) --
and I believe that's a wanted feature for a binary kit..

I do feel very comfortable building for SGI though, as that's what I've
been doing since I joined the list (back when JWZ asked for beta testers
for Irix 5).  So if there should be a missing SGI builder then I volunteer
to sneak up to my colleagues boxes (with sound) and do some builds at
night (6.2 and 6.3, possibly 6.4 (Origin)).

Otherwise I'll help out with checking out the binary kits others build,
as someone suggested.

Tor



