From xemacs-m  Wed Mar 26 07:33:52 1997
Received: from omega.intranet.com ([192.148.106.20])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id HAA29421
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Wed, 26 Mar 1997 07:33:51 -0600 (CST)
Received: by omega.intranet.com; (5.65v3.2/1.3/10May95) id AA07016; Wed, 26 Mar 1997 08:34:30 -0500
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 1997 08:33:20 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <199703261333.IAA17466@blight.IntraNet.com>
From: Jonathan Edwards <edwards@intranet.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: Kyle Jones <kyle_jones@wonderworks.com>
Cc: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
Subject: large VM folders
In-Reply-To: <QQcimr22965.199703260624@crystal.WonderWorks.COM>
References: <199703260615.BAA01122@beavis.bayserve.net>
	<QQcimr22965.199703260624@crystal.WonderWorks.COM>
X-Mailer: VM 6.22 under 19.15 XEmacs Lucid (beta104)
X-Face: #bA9Kpw-a@xMyaNJ-2wie(5Lje^S*i^8!VUOF84U!/jSPG*y@3s4Qu+\-FBQ?vQpE1S1<Vo
 TeWVx=wH}wf_WC]x:D%qd,r*|!~q=gVAWEA;T~3V4};X$r7W!FA(#Zj'E7M^(Tv)

Kyle Jones writes:
> I counted two reports.  And I have warned time and time again
> against using large fodlers with VM.  Maybe the rest of the world
> listened? :)  Not a peep about the problem on bug/info-vm.

I archived 3000 messages last month (a lot from this list).
Is that beyond VM's recommended constraints? 

