From xemacs-m  Wed Mar 26 10:22:18 1997
Received: from amber.vis-av.com (amber.vis-av.com [206.119.44.2])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id KAA01924
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Wed, 26 Mar 1997 10:22:17 -0600 (CST)
Received: (from derrell@localhost)
          by amber.vis-av.com (8.8.5/8.8.4)
	  id LAA29985; Wed, 26 Mar 1997 11:22:12 -0500 (EST)
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 1997 11:22:12 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <199703261622.LAA29985@amber.vis-av.com>
From: Derrell Lipman <derrell@vis-av.com>
To: wmperry@aventail.com
Cc: Per Abrahamsen <abraham@dina.kvl.dk>, xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
Subject: Re: Speed (was Re: NEWS submission)
In-Reply-To: <199703261551.HAA18603@newman>
References: <199703252230.RAA19898@blight.IntraNet.com>
	<m2d8snfrtr.fsf@altair.xemacs.org>
	<199703252349.PAA17211@newman>
	<kig2093bjx2.fsf@jagor.srce.hr>
	<rxspvwmaovv.fsf@midnight.ecf.teradyne.com>
	<199703261447.GAA18348@newman>
	<rjpvwm7j04.fsf@zuse.dina.kvl.dk>
	<199703261551.HAA18603@newman>
X-Mailer: VM 6.22 under 19.15 XEmacs Lucid (beta104)
Reply-To: derrell@vis-av.com
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.106)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII

>>>>> "  William" == William M Perry <wmperry@aventail.com> writes:

  William>   Could there be something architecture-specific that would
  William> account for this incredible slowdown?  Anyone else see
  William> ridiculous timings like this?

On a PPRO 200 running FreeBSD, times were as follows:

    Parse	  5 seconds
    Draw	7.5 minutes

For comparison, Internet Explorer under Windows '95 took 38 seconds to
render this page.

Derrell

