From xemacs-m  Fri Mar 28 07:38:13 1997
Received: from neal.ctd.comsat.com (exim@neal.ctd.comsat.com [134.133.40.21])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id HAA04721
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Fri, 28 Mar 1997 07:38:13 -0600 (CST)
Received: from neal by neal.ctd.comsat.com with local (Exim 1.61 #1)
	id 0wAbrA-0005XM-00; Fri, 28 Mar 1997 08:38:12 -0500
To: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
Subject: Re: XEmacs crash (efs-related)
References: <199703271307.OAA03894@atusel63.alcatel.at> <rvwwqt6nt1.fsf@sdnp5.ucsd.edu> <m2d8slc87w.fsf@altair.xemacs.org> <rvvi6d6irv.fsf@sdnp5.ucsd.edu> <m2u3lwq0qq.fsf@altair.xemacs.org> <rvpvwk7p46.fsf@sdnp5.ucsd.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.106)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
From: Neal Becker <neal@ctd.comsat.com>
Date: 28 Mar 1997 08:38:12 -0500
In-Reply-To: David Moore's message of 27 Mar 1997 17:59:53 -0800
Message-ID: <u9pvwkp263.fsf@neal.ctd.comsat.com>
Lines: 3
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.33/XEmacs 20.1(beta9)

Actually, I experimented with efs many moons back, and I dropped it,
partly because asking to refresh the directory was too slow and too
annoying.  I can live very well without it!

